Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Sentinel Node Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer (ENDO-3)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04073706
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : August 29, 2019
Last Update Posted : September 13, 2021
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
The University of Queensland
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer

Brief Summary:

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological cancer. Current treatment of EC typically includes removal of the uterus and to determine the extent of the disease (removal of fallopian tubes, ovaries & if required a lymph node dissection (surgical staging)). While lymph node dissection may be valuable to guide the need for adjuvant treatment (chemo or radiotherapy) after surgery, it has been a topic of controversy for the last 30 years. In some patients it causes morbidity, specifically lymphoedema. This recently has been replaced with sentinel node biopsy (SNB). It requires an injection of a dye into the cervix with specific equipment & surgical dissection of the lymph node in which the dye first becomes visible. Despite this promising proposition & similar to a lymph node dissection, the value to patients, cost effectiveness & potential harms (e.g. lymphedema) of SNB compared to no-node dissection in EC has never been established. Aim: determine the value of SNB for patients, the healthcare system and exclude detriment to patients using a randomised approach 1:1. Stage 1 - 444 patients. Stage 2 additional 316 patients.

Primary Outcome Stage 1:

Proportion of participants returning to usual daily activities at 12 months from surgery using the EQ-5D which will determine when women in both groups can return to their usual activities.

Primary Outcome Stage 2:

Treatment non-inferiority as evaluated by disease-free survival status at 4.5 years post-surgery, as measured by the time interval between the date of randomisation and date of first recurrence. Confirmation of recurrent disease will be ascertained through clinical assessment, radiological work-up and/or histological results.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Endometrial Cancer Stage I Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery Procedure: TH BSO with SNB Note: If participants (≤45 years of age) wish to retain their ovaries a BSO may be omitted. Procedure: TH BSO without retroperitoneal node dissection Note: If participants (≤45 years of age) wish to retain their ovaries a BSO may be omitted. Phase 3

Detailed Description:

Hypothesis: The primary hypothesis is that SNB will not cause detriment to patients (lymphoedema, morbidity, loss of quality of life) and not increase costs compared to patients without a retroperitoneal node dissection. The secondary hypothesis is that disease-free survival in patients without retroperitoneal node dissection is not inferior to those receiving SNB.

Aims: To determine the value of SNB for patients, the healthcare system and to exclude detriment to patients.

Objectives:

Primary Stage 1:

To determine the recovery of participants (defined as incidence of adverse events, lower limb lymphoedema and health-related QOL) and to the healthcare system (cost) of Sentinel Node Biopsy (SNB) for the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer.

Primary Stage 2:

Compare disease-free survival at 4.5 years for participants randomised to receive hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with SNB compared to participants randomised to hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without retroperitoneal node dissection.

Secondary:

  • Compare patterns of recurrence and overall survival (OS) between the groups
  • Determine the cost-effectiveness of SNB
  • Compare Patient Reported Outcomes (PROMS) between the groups at 12 months from surgery
  • Compare Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) and Fear of Recurrence between the groups at 12 months from surgery
  • Compare perioperative outcomes (duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion requirements) and the incidence of intra- and postoperative adverse events within 12 months from surgery between the groups
  • Compare lower limb lymphoedema at 12 months after surgery
  • Compare the need for postoperative (adjuvant) treatments between groups
  • Determine the impact of body composition and frailty on survival, quality of life, lymphoedema, peri-, intra- and postoperative outcomes
  • Compare follow-up strategies (clinical vs symptom checklist)
  • Translational Research - Trans-ENDO 3 - biobanking strategy - Compare the Molecular profile at 12 months from surgery between the groups

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 760 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Phase III Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Sentinel Node Biopsy With No Retroperitoneal Node Dissection in Apparent Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer
Actual Study Start Date : January 18, 2021
Estimated Primary Completion Date : January 18, 2031
Estimated Study Completion Date : January 18, 2031

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Biopsy

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: TH BSO with SNB
Total Laparoscopic/Robotic Hysterectomy, Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy (TH BSO) with Sentinel Node Biopsy (SNB) using Indocyanine Green (ICG) (+/- omentectomy in high risk cell types) Note: If participants (≤45 years of age) wish to retain their ovaries a BSO may be omitted.
Procedure: TH BSO with SNB Note: If participants (≤45 years of age) wish to retain their ovaries a BSO may be omitted.
Removal of uterus, tubes and ovaries with a sentinel node biopsy. A tracer dye (ICG) is injected into the surroundings of the primary tumour, it is transported via local lymphatic channels towards the draining lymphatic basin, and the first node that the tracer reaches is called the "sentinel node". These one or two nodes are thought to be first involved with cancer spread.

Active Comparator: TH BSO without retroperitoneal node dissection
Total Laparoscopic/Robotic Hysterectomy, Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy (TH BSO) without retroperitoneal node dissection (+/- omentectomy in high risk cell types) Note: If participants (≤45 years of age) wish to retain their ovaries a BSO may be omitted.
Procedure: TH BSO without retroperitoneal node dissection Note: If participants (≤45 years of age) wish to retain their ovaries a BSO may be omitted.
Removal of uterus, tubes and ovaries without retroperitoneal node dissection




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Stage 1: Return to usual activities [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    Proportion of participants returning to usual daily activities at 12 months from surgery using the EQ-5D which will determine when women in both groups can return to their usual activities.

  2. Stage 2: Disease Free Survival [ Time Frame: 4.5 years from surgery ]
    Compare disease-free survival for participants randomised to receive hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with SNB compared to participants randomised to hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without retroperitoneal node dissection


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Cost Effectiveness using QALYs using EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) Questionnaire [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    An assessment will be performed on the cost-effectiveness of TH + SNB relative to TH alone, calculated as the incremental cost per unit of improvement in functional outcome, measured in terms of the primary outcome. This will assess how much more money the proposed intervention will cost the health system and society, and whether this represents a sound investment in terms of the improvement in quality of life. We will also measure the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained with the intervention and use this to undertake a cost-utility analysis. The QALY calculations will be based on health status measures for trial participants, with valuations of changes in health status and quality of life based on the EQ-5D

  2. Cost Effectiveness measuring Intervention costs [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    An assessment will be performed on the cost-effectiveness of TH + SNB relative to TH alone, calculated as the incremental cost per unit of improvement in functional outcome, measured in terms of the primary outcome. This will assess how much more money the proposed intervention will cost the health system and society.

  3. Cost Effectiveness measuring GP and specialist consultations [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    An assessment will be performed on the cost-effectiveness of TH + SNB relative to TH alone, calculated as the incremental cost per unit of improvement in functional outcome, measured in terms of the primary outcome. This will assess how much more money the proposed intervention will cost the health system and society, and whether this represents a sound investment in terms of the improvement in quality of life.

  4. Cost Effectiveness measuring radiology and imaging requirements [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    An assessment will be performed on the cost-effectiveness of TH + SNB relative to TH alone, calculated as the incremental cost per unit of improvement in functional outcome, measured in terms of the primary outcome. This will assess how much more money the proposed intervention will cost the health system and society.

  5. Cost Effectiveness measuring prescriptions and over the counter medicine requirements [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    An assessment will be performed on the cost-effectiveness of TH + SNB relative to TH alone, calculated as the incremental cost per unit of improvement in functional outcome, measured in terms of the primary outcome. This will assess how much more money the proposed intervention will cost the health system and society, and whether this represents a sound investment in terms of the improvement in quality of life.

  6. Cost Effectiveness measuring community and health service requirements and days off work and informal care required by family and friends using a combination of the Health Services Questionnaire and clinical files [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    An assessment will be performed on the cost-effectiveness of TH + SNB relative to TH alone, calculated as the incremental cost per unit of improvement in functional outcome, measured in terms of the primary outcome. This will assess how much more money the proposed intervention will cost the health system and society, and whether this represents a sound investment in terms of the improvement in quality of life.

  7. Cost Effectiveness: direct costs using a bottom-up approach by recording the volume of resource use in both groups of the trial, and then applying a unit cost to each component [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    Direct costs wukk be ibtained for smaples of participants, stratified by hospital, operation and outcome to assess the cost-effectiveness of TH + SNB relative to TH alone, calculated as the incremental cost per unit of improvement in functional outcome, measured in terms of the primary outcome. This will assess how much more money the proposed intervention will cost the health system and society.

  8. Perioperative Outcomes: Adverse Events [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    Compare perioperative outcomes and the incidence of intra- and postoperative adverse events within 12 months from surgery between groups using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5)

  9. Perioperative Outcomes: Length of Surgery [ Time Frame: At time of surgery ]
    Compare the length of surgery between the two groups. This will be recorded in hh:mm on the surgery form.

  10. Perioperative Outcomes: Blood Loss during Surgery [ Time Frame: At time of surgery ]
    Compare the blood loss between the two groups during surgery. This will be recorded in ml.

  11. Perioperative Outcomes: Blood Transfusion Requirements during Surgery [ Time Frame: At time of surgery ]
    Compare the blood transfusion requirements between the two groups. This will be recorded in units and recorded on the Surgery Form and the Concomitant Medication Form.

  12. Perioperative Outcomes: Length of Hospital Stay [ Time Frame: At time of discharge from hospital following surgery ]
    Compare the length of hospital stay between the two groups. The duration will be measured in days. Date of surgery being day 0.

  13. Health Related Quality of Life and Fear of Recurrence [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    Change in Quality of Life using Functional Assessment of Cancer General (FACT-EN), Fear of Recurrence and PROMS between baseline and 1 year after surgery

  14. Incidence of Lymphedema [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    Compare lower limb lymphedema between groups

  15. Adjuvant Treatment Requirements [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    Compare the need for postoperative (adjuvant) treatments between groups and evaluate the impact of SNB on clinical decisions regarding adjuvant treatment. Any chemotherapy or radiation therapy required will be recorded on specific chemotherapy or radiation forms. Chemotherapy will be recorded in mg received and number of doses required including start/end dates. Radiation treatment received will be recorded as total dose of Gy and how many fractions, including start and end dates.

  16. Value of Molecular Biomarkers [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    Translational Research - Compare the Molecular profile of Germline DNA at 12 months from surgery between the groups

  17. Value of Molecular Biomarkers [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    Translational Research - Compare the Molecular profile of Circulating Tumour DNA at 12 months from surgery between the groups

  18. Value of Molecular Biomarkers [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    Translational Research - Compare the Molecular profile of Plasma at 12 months from surgery between the groups

  19. Value of Molecular Biomarkers [ Time Frame: 12 months from surgery ]
    Translational Research - Compare the Molecular profile of Serum at 12 months from surgery between the groups

  20. Overall Survival [ Time Frame: 4.5 years from surgery ]
    Compare overall survival for participants randomised to receive hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with SNB compared to participants randomised to hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without retroperitoneal node dissection

  21. Patterns of Recurrence - date and localization of 1st recurrence [ Time Frame: 4.5 years from surgery ]
    Date and localization of 1st recurrence as confirmed histologically and/or radiologically - Compare these patterns of recurrences between the groups. These will also be adjudicated by an independent committee to ensure accuracy of documented recurrence

  22. Impact of body composition (sarcopenia) on surgical complications, recovery and overall survival [ Time Frame: 4.5 years from surgery ]
    Body mass measures are practical & sensitive for predicting health risks & outcomes. Sarcopenia is defined as loss of skeletal muscle mass & strength. It's been found to be associated with procedure-related morbidity, survival in cancer patients and increased use of healthcare. The concurrent appearance of low muscle mass with high adiposity (sarcopenic obesity) is common in people with chronic diseases. The trial will determine the role sarcopenia has on participants pre-operatively (via CT images & Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BIS - if available at site) & postoperatively using the BIS in regard to survival in gynaecological malignancies, if it is a predictive factor for treatment adverse events & participants tolerability of treatment & compare diagnostic methods to determine medical fitness for surgery. BIS sends non-detectable electrical currents, at a range of frequencies through the body allowing precise measurement & analysis of impedance to currents by extracellular fluid

  23. Impact of frailty on surgical complications, recovery and overall survival [ Time Frame: 4.5 years from surgery ]
    It has been reported consistently that frailty has a significant impact on the occurrence of adverse postoperative outcomes. Therefore, measuring frailty is important to estimate risks, determine the best treatment options, and to aid diagnosis and care planning. Frailty will be measured prior to surgery suing the validated tool - Frailty Phenotype. This may determine the impact frailty has on survival, quality of life, lymphedema, peri-, intra- and postoperative outcomes

  24. Follow-Up Strategies [ Time Frame: 4.5 years from surgery ]
    Current institutional & clinical guidelines suggest patients need to be seen at regular follow up visits. The risk of developing a recurrence is higher within the initial period after surgery & the majority of recurrences develop within those first 3 years. Participants will ideally be seen 3 monthly for the first 3 years & 6 monthly until 4.5 years. The objective of follow up is that local recurrences from endometrial cancer are potentially curable. It helps to diagnose local recurrences as early as possible so that they are amenable for curative or effective palliative management. We will compare these clinical findings to a symptom checklist that will be completed by participants every 3 months from surgery until 4.5 years. This records patient reported symptoms that may indicate a recurrence. Comparing these findings should determine effective follow up strategies for this group of patients.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Females, over 18 years, with histologically confirmed primary epithelial cancer of the endometrium of any cell type or uterine carcinosarcoma (mixed malignant mullerian tumour);
  2. Clinically stage I disease (disease confined to body of uterus);
  3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1;
  4. Signed written informed consent;
  5. Participant must meet criteria for a laparoscopic or robotic surgical approach as determined by the treating physician (e.g. suitable for TH BSO, ability to tolerate Trendelenberg positioning)
  6. All available clinical evidence (physical examination findings, or medical imaging such as CT, MRI or ultrasound) demonstrates no evidence of extrauterine disease
  7. Negative serum pregnancy test ≤ 30 days of surgery in pre-menopausal women and women < 2 years after the onset of menopause.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Evidence of extrauterine disease (apparent involvement of cervix, vagina, parametria, adnexa, lymph nodes, bladder, bowel or distant sites) by clinical examination and/or through medical imaging.
  2. Enlarged retroperitoneal pelvic and/or aortic lymph nodes (>1 cm) on medical imaging;
  3. Estimated life expectancy of less than 6 months;
  4. Patients who have absolute contraindications for adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy;
  5. Patients who have previously received chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment to the pelvis
  6. Serious concomitant systemic disorders incompatible with the study (at the discretion of the investigator);
  7. Patient compliance and geographic proximity that do not allow adequate follow-up;
  8. Patients with allergy to Indocyanine Green (ICG)
  9. Patients who have had previous retroperitoneal surgery
  10. Patients who require a retroperitoneal (pelvic +/- para-aortic) lymph node dissection (lymphadenectomy)
  11. Other prior malignancies <5 years before inclusion, except for successfully treated keratinocyte skin cancers, or ductal carcinoma of the breast insitu
  12. Uterine perforation during endometrial tissue sampling

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04073706


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Vanessa Behan, BSN +61 7 3346 5590 endo3trial@health.qld.gov.au
Contact: Trudi Cattley +61 7 3346 5063 trudi.cattley@health.qld.gov.au

Locations
Layout table for location information
Australia, New South Wales
Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Not yet recruiting
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
Contact: Rhonda Farrell, MD       rhondafarrell@mac.com   
Contact: Shannon Brodie       shannon.brodie@lh.org.au   
Principal Investigator: Rhonda Farrell, MD         
John Hunter Hospital Not yet recruiting
Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia, 2305
Contact: Ken Jaaback, MD    + 61 2 4989 6896    kenneth.jaaback@health.nsw.gov.au   
Principal Investigator: Ken Jaaback, MD         
Australia, Queensland
The Wesley Hospital Recruiting
Auchenflower, Queensland, Australia, 4066
Contact: Vanessa Behan, BSN    +61 7 3346 5590    endo3trial@health.qld.gov.au   
Contact: Trudi Cattley    +61 7 3346 5063    trudi.cattley@health.qld.gov.au   
Principal Investigator: James Nicklin, MD         
Sub-Investigator: Andrea Garrett, MD         
Buderim Private Hospital Recruiting
Buderim, Queensland, Australia, 4556
Contact: Vanessa Behan, BSN    +61 7 3346 5590    endo3trial@health.qld.gov.au   
Contact: Trudi Cattley    + 61 7 3346 5063    trudi.cattley@health.qld.gov.au   
Principal Investigator: Andreas Obermair, MD         
Townsville Hospital Not yet recruiting
Douglas, Queensland, Australia, 4814
Contact: Vanessa Behan, BSN    + 61 7 3346 5590    endo3trial@health.qld.gov.au   
Contact: Greet Hoet, MD    + 61 7 4433 3622    Greet.Hoet@health.qld.gov.au   
Principal Investigator: Greet Hoet, MD         
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Recruiting
Herston, Queensland, Australia, 4029
Contact: Vanessa Behan, BSN    +61 7 3346 5590    endo3trial@health.qld.gov.au   
Contact: Trudi Cattley    +61 7 3346 5063    trudi.cattley@health.qld.gov.au   
Principal Investigator: Andrea Garrett, MD         
Sub-Investigator: Andreas Obermair, MD         
Sub-Investigator: Russell Land, MD         
Mater Hospital Not yet recruiting
South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4101
Contact: Vanessa Behan, BSN    +61 7 3346 5590    endo3trial@health.qld.gov.au   
Contact: Trudi Cattley    + 61 7 3346 5063    trudi.cattley@health.qld.gov.au   
Principal Investigator: Lewis Perrin, MD         
Sub-Investigator: Naven Chetty, MD         
Sub-Investigator: Nisha Jagasia, MD         
Gold Coast University Hospital Not yet recruiting
Southport, Queensland, Australia, 4215
Contact: Vanessa Behan, BSN    +61 7 3346 5590    endo3trial@health.qld.gov.au   
Contact: Trudi Cattley    +61 7 3346 5063    trudi.cattley@health.qld.gov.au   
Principal Investigator: Marcelo Nascimento, MD         
St Andrews War Memorial Hospital Recruiting
Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia, 4000
Contact: Vanessa Behan, BSN    +61 7 3346 5590    endo3trial@health.qld.gov.au   
Contact: Trudi Cattley    +61 7 3346 5063    trudi.cattley@health.qld.gov.au   
Principal Investigator: Andreas Obermair, MD         
Australia, Victoria
Royal Women's Hospital Not yet recruiting
Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3052
Contact: Julie Silvers       Julie.Silvers@thewomens.org.au   
Contact: Orla McNally, MD       Orla.McNally@thewomens.org.au   
Principal Investigator: Orla McNally, MD         
Singapore
National University Hospital and National University Cancer Institute Not yet recruiting
Singapore, NUH Zone B, Singapore, 119074
Contact: Joseph Ng Soon Yau, MD       obgnsyj@nus.edu.sg   
Contact: Pearl S Tong, MD       pearl_sy_tong@nuhs.edu.sg   
Principal Investigator: Joseph Ng Soon Yau, MD         
Sub-Investigator: Pearl S Tong, MD         
Sponsors and Collaborators
Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer
The University of Queensland
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Chair: Andreas Obermiar, MD Director, Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04073706    
Other Study ID Numbers: ENDO-3
First Posted: August 29, 2019    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: September 13, 2021
Last Verified: September 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer:
uterine cancer
sentinel node biopsy
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Endometrial Neoplasms
Uterine Neoplasms
Genital Neoplasms, Female
Urogenital Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Neoplasms
Uterine Diseases