Comparison of Successful Spinal Needle Placement Between Crossed Leg Sitting Position and Traditional Sitting Position
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02766829|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : May 10, 2016
Last Update Posted : May 10, 2016
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Adult Patients With Spinal Anesthesia||Procedure: Cross leg sitting position Procedure: Traditional sitting position||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||211 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Primary Purpose:||Supportive Care|
|Official Title:||Comparison of Successful Spinal Needle Placement Between Crossed Leg Sitting Position and Traditional Sitting Position in Patients Underwent Urology Surgery|
|Study Start Date :||March 2015|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||October 2015|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||October 2015|
Experimental: CLSP Group
Those with cross leg sitting position: patients sit with both their knees flexed medially, hip flexed, resulting in pelvic leaning posteriorly and reducing lumbal lordosis.
Procedure: Cross leg sitting position
Subjects were set on cross leg sitting position before spinal anesthesia begun.
Active Comparator: TSP Group
Those with traditional sitting position: patient is positioned with her knees flexed 90o, both feet hanging of the bed and propped up by a chair, both arms hugging a pillow, adducted pelvic, maximum pelvic flexion were done to create maximal sagittal lumbal flexion.
Procedure: Traditional sitting position
Subjects were set on traditional sitting position before spinal anesthesia begun.
- One shot successful spinal needle placement [ Time Frame: 7 months ]The number of successful spinal needle placement in the first attempt
- Needle-bone contact number [ Time Frame: 7 months ]The number of needle-bone contact recorded.
- The difficulty level of landmark palpation for injection [ Time Frame: 7 months ]the difficulty level of landmark palpation for injection were assessed as easy or difficult.
- Spinal needle placement complications [ Time Frame: 7 months ]Complications recorded were post dural puncture headache, low back pain and neural trauma.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02766829
|Cipto Mangunkusumo Central National Hospital|
|Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430|
|Principal Investigator:||Sidharta K Manggala, Consultant||Indonesia University|