We're building a better ClinicalTrials.gov. Check it out and tell us what you think!
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Phase 3 Study Comparing 2 Doses Of CP-690,550 And The Active Comparator, Humira (Adalimumab) Vs. Placebo For Treatment Of Rheumatoid Arthritis

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00853385
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : March 2, 2009
Results First Posted : January 9, 2013
Last Update Posted : January 18, 2013
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Pfizer

Study Description
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Brief Summary:
This is a comparative study of CP 690,550, Humira (adalimumab) and placebo on background methotrexate in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. The study is intended to provide evidence of the efficacy and safety of CP 690,550 when dosed 5 mg and 10 mg twice a day on background methotrexate in adult patients with moderate to severe Rheumatoid Arthritis. It is intended to confirm the benefits of CP-690,550 in improving signs and symptoms and physical function that were observed in Rheumatoid Arthritis. An active comparator, adalimumab, is also included.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Rheumatoid Arthritis Drug: CP 690,550 Drug: CP-690,550 Other: Placebo Biological: Biologic TNFi Phase 3

Study Design
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 717 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator, Placebo-Controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of 2 Doses Of CP 690,550 In Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis On Background Methotrexate
Study Start Date : May 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date : March 2011
Actual Study Completion Date : March 2011

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

Drug Information available for: Adalimumab

Arms and Interventions
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: 5mg Drug: CP 690,550
tablets 5 mg BID PO plus q2 week placebo SC injections for 12 months
Experimental: 10 mg Drug: CP-690,550
tablets 10 mg BID PO plus q2 week placebo SC injections for 12 months
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Sequence 1 Other: Placebo
placebo tablets BID PO advance to 5mg CP 690,550 BID at Month 3 or 6 visit plus q2 week placebo SC injections for 12 months
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Sequence 2 Other: Placebo
tablets BID PO advance tablets to10mg CP 690,550 BID at Month 3 or 6 visit plus q2 week placebo SC injections for 12 months
Active Comparator: adalimumab Biological: Biologic TNFi
placebo tablets BID PO plus adalimumab 40 mg q2 week SC injections for 12 months
Other Name: Humira (Adalimumab)


Outcome Measures
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 6 [ Time Frame: Month 6 ]
    ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 20% improvement in tender joint count (TJC); >= 20% improvement in swollen joint count (SJC); and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 6 analysis.

  2. Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3 ]
    HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3: 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 3 analysis.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 6 [ Time Frame: Month 6 ]
    DAS28-4 (ESR) calculated from SJC and TJC using 28-joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and > 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and < 2.6 = remission. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 6 analysis.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 1 and 3 [ Time Frame: Month 1, 3 ]
    ACR20 response: >=20% improvement in TJC; >= 20% improvement in SJC; and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 9, 12 ]
    ACR20 response: >=20% improvement in tender joint count; >=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and >=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Month 1, 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Month 1, 3, 6 ]
    ACR50 response: >=50% improvement in tender joint count; >=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Month 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 9, 12 ]
    ACR50 response: >=50% improvement in tender joint count; >=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Month 1, 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Month 1, 3, 6 ]
    ACR70 response: >=70% improvement in tender joint count; >=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Month 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 9, 12 ]
    ACR70 response: >=70% improvement in tender joint count; >=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

  7. Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6 ]
    DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (milligram per liter [mg/L]). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.

  8. Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Month 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 9, 12 ]
    DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.

  9. Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6 ]
    DAS28-4 (ESR) calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and PGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.

  10. Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Month 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 9, 12 ]
    DAS28-4 (ESR) calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and PGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.

  11. Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP]) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 ]
    DAS28-4 [CRP] calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, CRP (mg/L) and PGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.

  12. Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [ESR]) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 ]
    DAS28-3 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and ESR (mm/hour). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (ESR) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.

  13. Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Month 1, 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Month 1, 3, 6 ]
    HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3:0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3: 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty.

  14. Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Month 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 9, 12 ]
    HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3:0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3: 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty.

  15. Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6 ]
    Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.

  16. Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Month 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 9, 12 ]
    Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.

  17. Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6 ]
    Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.

  18. Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Month 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 9, 12 ]
    Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.

  19. Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6 ]
    Physician global assessment of arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.

  20. Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis Pain at Month 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 9, 12 ]
    Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.

  21. 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6 ]
    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and was reported as 2 summary scores; Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100 where higher scores represented higher level of functioning.

  22. 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 9, 12 ]
    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and was reported as 2 summary scores; Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100 where higher scores represented higher level of functioning.

  23. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6 ]
    FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item questionnaire. Participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as 4 minus the participant's response. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.

  24. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]
    FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item questionnaire. Participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as 4 minus the participant's response. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.

  25. Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6 ]
    Participant-rated questionnaire to assess key constructs of sleep over the past week. Consists of a 12-item based on 7 sub scales: sleep disturbance (SD), snoring (Sno), awakened short of breath (ASOB) or with headache, sleep adequacy (Ade), and somnolence (Som) (range:0-100); sleep quantity (Qua)(range:0-24), and optimal (Opt) sleep (yes: 1, no: 0) and nine item index measures of sleep disturbance were constructed to provide composite scores: sleep problem summary (SPS) and overall sleep problems (OSP). Except sleep adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=greater impairment. Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range* 100); total score range: 0 to 100; higher score = greater intensity of attribute.

  26. Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]
    Participant-rated questionnaire to assess key constructs of sleep over the past week. Consists of a 12-item based on 7 sub scales: sleep disturbance (SD), snoring (Sno), awakened short of breath (ASOB) or with headache, sleep adequacy (Ade), and somnolence (Som) (range:0-100); sleep quantity (Qua)(range:0-24), and optimal (Opt) sleep (yes: 1, no: 0) and nine item index measures of sleep disturbance were constructed to provide composite scores: sleep problem summary (SPS) and overall sleep problems (OSP). Except sleep adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=greater impairment. Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range* 100); total score range: 0 to 100; higher score = greater intensity of attribute.

  27. Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6 ]
    MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity and optimal sleep. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not by choosing yes or no. Number of participants with optimal sleep are reported.

  28. Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]
    MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity and optimal sleep. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not by choosing yes or no. Number of participants with optimal sleep are reported.

  29. Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Profile Utility Score at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6 ]
    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

  30. Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Profile Utility Score at Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]
    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

  31. Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Month 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Month 3, 6 ]
    WLQ: participant-reported 25-item scale to evaluate degree to which health problems interfere with an ability to perform job roles along 4 dimensions: 5-items Time Management scale (TMS); 6-items Physical Demands scale (PDS); 9-items Mental-Interpersonal Demands Scale (MIDS); 5-items Output Demands scale (ODS). All the scales ranged from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time). Work Loss Index (WLI), which represented percentage of lost work over time period relative to a normative population, was derived (total score: 0 [no loss] to 100 [complete loss of work]).

  32. Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline and Month 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 ]
    WLQ: participant-reported 25-item scale to evaluate degree to which health problems interfere with an ability to perform job roles along 4 dimensions: 5-items Time Management scale (TMS); 6-items Physical Demands scale (PDS); 9-items Mental-Interpersonal Demands Scale (MIDS); 5-items Output Demands scale (ODS). All the scales ranged from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time). Work Loss Index (WLI), which represented percentage of lost work over time period relative to a normative population, was derived (total score: 0 [no loss] to 100 [complete loss of work]).

  33. Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6 ]
    Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months for direct, indirect medical cost domains. Direct cost: any RA/non-RA related medical/non-medical (NM) practitioner visit, nursing home, hospital, surgery, emergency room (ER) treatment, diagnostic tests, over-night stay, home healthcare (HC) services, aids/devices used. Indirect costs associated with functional disability: employment status, willingness to work, work disability due to RA, sick leave, part time work, ability to perform chores, chores done by family/friends/housekeeper. Assessment was based on 0 to 2-point scale; higher score indicated higher medical cost.

  34. Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]
    RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months for direct, indirect medical cost domains. Direct cost: visit to doctor, NM practitioner, nursing home, hospital, surgery, ER treatment, diagnostic tests, over-night stay, home HC services, and aids/devices used. Indirect costs associated with functional disability: employment status, willingness to work, work disability due to RA, sick leave, part time work, ability to perform chores, chores done by family/friends/housekeeper. Assessment was based on 0 to 2-point scale; higher score indicated higher medical cost.

  35. Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6 ]
    RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA/non-RA related number of events including visits to doctor, non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported.

  36. Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]
    RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA/non-RA related number of events including visits to doctor, non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported.

  37. Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6 ]
    RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of days spent in hospital, nursing home, aids/devices used, on sick leave, work per week, performed part time work, performed paid work, chores done by housekeeper and chores done by family/friends.

  38. Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]
    RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of days spent in hospital, nursing home, aids/devices used, on sick leave, work per week, performed part time work, performed paid work, chores done by housekeeper and chores done by family/friends.

  39. Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6 ]
    RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of hours spent per day for home healthcare services, chores done by housekeeper, chores done by family or friends, hours affected per day and average number of hours missed work per day were reported.

  40. Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]
    RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of hours spent per day for home healthcare services, chores done by housekeeper, chores done by family or friends, hours affected per day and average number of hours missed work per day were reported.

  41. Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6 ]
    Work performance of participants on number of days bothered was based on 10-point scale, where higher score indicated lower work performance.

  42. Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]
    Work performance of participants on number of days bothered was based on 10-point scale, where higher score indicated lower work performance.


Eligibility Criteria
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has a diagnosis of RA based upon the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 Revised Criteria.
  • The patient must have had an inadequate response to methotrexate and have active disease, as defined by both: ≥6 joints tender or painful on motion; and ≥6 joints swollen; and fulfills 1 of the following 2 criteria at Screening: 1.ESR (Westergren method) >28 mm in the local laboratory. 2. CRP >7 mg/L in the central laboratory.
  • No evidence of active or latent or inadequately treated infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
  • The patient must have been on a stable dose of 7.5 mg to 25 mg weekly of methotrexate and washed out of all other DMARDs.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Blood dyscrasias including confirmed: 1. Hemoglobin <9 g/dL or Hematocrit <30%; 2. White blood cell count <3,000 cu.mm. Absolute neutrophil count <1,200 cu.mm; 4. Platelet count <100,000/L
  • History of any other autoimmune rheumatic disease other than Sjogren's syndrome
  • No malignancy or history of malignancy.
  • History of infection requiring hospitalization, parenteral antimicrobial therapy, or as otherwise judged clinically significant by the investigator, within the 6 months prior to the first dose of study drug
  • Patients who have failed any TNFi for either lack of efficacy or a TNFi mechanism related adverse event.
  • Patients who have previously received adalimumab therapy for any reason.
  • Patients who are contraindicated for treatment with adalimumab in accordance with the approved local label.
  • Patients meeting the New York Heart Association Class III and Class IV Congestive Heart failure
Contacts and Locations
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00853385


Locations
Show Show 125 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Pfizer
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center Pfizer
More Information
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Additional Information:

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Pfizer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00853385    
Other Study ID Numbers: A3921064
First Posted: March 2, 2009    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: January 9, 2013
Last Update Posted: January 18, 2013
Last Verified: January 2013
Keywords provided by Pfizer:
oral DMARD
JAK inhibitor
clinical trial
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Arthritis
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Joint Diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Rheumatic Diseases
Connective Tissue Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
Immune System Diseases
 Adalimumab
Tofacitinib
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Antirheumatic Agents
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
Enzyme Inhibitors
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action