ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Trial record 2 of 6 for:    GSK3196165

Mechanistic Study of GSK3196165 Plus Methotrexate (MTX) in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02799472
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 14, 2016
Results First Posted : November 16, 2018
Last Update Posted : November 16, 2018
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Parexel
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
GlaxoSmithKline

Brief Summary:
This study is designed to explore the activity of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) signaling pathway in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the potential impact of inhibition of this axis by GSK3196165, and to evaluate whether there are any differences in the GM-CSF axis between subjects with early RA compared with those with more established disease. This study also aims to establish the potential impact of GSK3196165 on inflammatory structural joint damage in the hand/wrist using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This is a randomized Phase IIa, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study. Approximately 40 subjects with active RA despite treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (including conventional or biologic) will be randomized into the study, following a screening period of up to 6 weeks. The total treatment period is up to 10 weeks, with a 12-week follow-up period after the last dose (Week 22).

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Arthritis, Rheumatoid Drug: GSK3196165 Drug: Placebo Drug: MTX Drug: Folic (or folinic) acid Phase 2

Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 39 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Phase IIa, Double-Blind, Mechanistic Study of GSK3196165 in Combination With Methotrexate Therapy in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Treatment With DMARDs
Actual Study Start Date : June 15, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date : October 30, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date : October 30, 2017

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: GSK3196165 + MTX arm
Subjects will receive GSK3196165 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (15-25 mg/week) and folic (or folinic) acid (>=5 mg/week).
Drug: GSK3196165
GSK3196165 is supplied as liquid and will be administered as SC injection.

Drug: MTX
Capsule, tablet or liquid administered orally or as SC injection.

Drug: Folic (or folinic) acid
Capsule, tablet or liquid and will be administered orally.

Placebo Comparator: Placebo + MTX arm
Subjects will receive placebo (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (15-25 mg/week) and folic (or folinic) acid (>=5 mg/week).
Drug: Placebo
0.9% weight by volume (w/v) sodium chloride solution administered as SC injection.

Drug: MTX
Capsule, tablet or liquid administered orally or as SC injection.

Drug: Folic (or folinic) acid
Capsule, tablet or liquid and will be administered orally.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change From Baseline in Target Engagement Biomarkers- Soluble Granulocyte-macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) Complexed to GSK3196165 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12-Week follow-up (FU) (Week 22) ]
    Blood samples were collected for markers which may influence rheumatoid arthritis. Target engagement biomarkers included soluble GM-CSF complexed to GSK3196165. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for GM-CSF - Complex log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Analysis was performed on Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population which consisted of all participants who were randomized to treatment and who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  2. Change From Baseline in Predictive Biomarkers: 14-3-3 ETA Protein, S100 Calcium Binding Protein (CBP) A8 and A9 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Predictive biomarkers included analysis of 14-3-3 ETA Protein, S100 CBP A8 and A9. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for 14-3-3 ETA Protein (mg/L) and S100 CBP A8 and A9 log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  3. Change From Baseline in Predictive Biomarkers: Amyloid A [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Predictive biomarkers included analysis of Amyloid A. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for Amyloid A log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Data has been presented for only those time points at which the samples were collected.

  4. Change From Baseline in Predictive Biomarkers: Amyloid A, Chemokine (C-C Motif) Ligand 17, Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 13, Interleukin 6, Macrophage-Derived Chemokine [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Predictive biomarkers included analysis of Chemokine (C-C Motif) Ligand 17 (CL17), Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 13 (CL13), Interleukin 6, Macrophage-Derived Chemokine (MDC). Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for CL17, CL13, Interleukin 6, MDC log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles). Data has been presented for only those time points at which the samples were collected.

  5. Change From Baseline in Predictive Biomarkers: Chitinase 3 Like 1, Matrix Metalloproteinase 3 (MMP-3) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Predictive biomarkers included analysis of Chitinase 3 Like 1 and MMP-3. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for Chitinase 3 Like 1 and MMP-3 log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  6. Change From Baseline in Cartilage Biomarkers [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers that may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Cartilage biomarkers included analysis of ARGS Neo-Epitope, Citrullinated MMP-Degraded Vimentin (CMDV), MMP-Degraded C Reactive Protein (CRP), MMP-Degraded Type I Collagen (MD1C), MMP-Degraded Type II Collagen (MD2C), MMP-Degraded Type III Collagen (MD3C). Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for ARGS Neo-Epitope, Citrullinated MMP-Degraded Vimentin, MMP-Degraded CRP, MMP-Degraded Type I Collagen, MMP-Degraded Type II Collagen and MMP-Degraded Type III Collagen log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  7. Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry: Helper/Suppressor Cells [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Whole blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Flow cytometry assessment included assessment of Helper/Suppressor. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for Helper/Suppressor log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  8. Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry: 6 Colour TB Natural Killer (NK) Panel- CD16+CD56+, CD19, CD3, CD3+CD4+ [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Whole blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Flow cytometry assessment included assessment of cluster of differentiation (CD)16+CD56+, CD19, CD3, CD3+CD4+. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Repeated measures analysis adjusted for CD16+CD56+, CD19, CD3, CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+ and T Cell B Cell NKL log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  9. Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry: 6 Colour TBNK Panel- CD3+CD8+ and T Cell B Cell Natural Killer Lymphocytes (NKL) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Whole blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Flow cytometry assessment included assessment of CD3+CD8+ and T Cell B Cell NKL. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose value from the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for CD3+CD8+ and T Cell B Cell NKL log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  10. Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry: T Regulatory (Reg) Cell Foxp3- CD3+ CD4+, CD3+ CD8+ and CD3+ [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Whole blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Flow cytometry assessment included assessment of CD3+ CD4+, CD3+ CD8+ and CD3+. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for CD3+ CD4+, CD3+ CD8+ and CD3+ Number of Cells (10^6/L) log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  11. Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry: T Reg Cell Foxp3: CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127-, CD3+CD4+foxP3+CD25+CD127- [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Whole blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Flow cytometry assessment included assessment of CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127- and CD3+CD4+foxP3+CD25+CD127-. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose value from the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127- and CD3+CD4+foxP3+CD25+CD127-Number of Cells (10^6 cells/L) log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  12. Change From Baseline in T Helper Cell Panel Events [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. T Helper Cell Panel included analysis of CD45+3+8-4+CCR6+CXCR3+38+DR+, CD45+3+8-4+CCR6+CXCR3-38+DR+, CD45+3+8-4+CCR6-CXCR3+38+DR+, CD45+3+8-4+CCR6-CXCR3-38+DR+, CD45+CD3+CD8-CD4+, CD45+CD3+CD8-CD4+CCR6+CXCR3+, CD45+CD3+CD8-CD4+CCR6+CXCR3-, CD45+CD3+CD8-CD4+CCR6-CXCR3+ and CD45+CD3+CD8-CD4+CCR6-CXCR3-. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose value from the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for T Helper Cell Panel Events (EVENTS) Baseline value, treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  13. Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry: CD16+ Monocyte Panel: CD14-HLA-DR+CD11cbr+CD123-, CD14br+CD16+, CD14br+CD16-, CD14lo+CD16br+ [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Whole blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Flow cytometry assessment included assessment of CD14-HLA-DR+CD11cbr+CD123-, CD14br+CD16+, CD14br+CD16- and CD14lo+CD16br+. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose value from the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for CD14-HLA-DR+CD11cbr+CD123-, CD14br+CD16+, CD14br+CD16- and CD14lo+CD16br+ (10^3/Liter) baseline value, treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  14. Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry: CD16+ Monocyte Panel: CD14-CD16+CD66b+ [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Whole blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Flow cytometry assessment included assessment of CD14-CD16+CD66b+ cell. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose value from the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for CD14-CD16+CD66b+ (10^6/Liter) baseline value, treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  15. Change From Baseline in Complement Biomarkers: Complement Component 3 (C3), Complement Component 4 (C4) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Complement biomarkers included analysis of Complement C3 and Complement C4. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  16. Change From Baseline in Complement Biomarkers: Complement Component 4a (C4a), Complement Component 5a (C5a), Complement Split Factor SC5b-9, Soluble Cluster of Differentiation 163 (sCD163) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Complement biomarkers included analysis of Complement C4a, Complement C5a, Complement Split Factor SC5b-9 and Soluble CD163. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  17. Change From Baseline in Mechanistic Biomarkers [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Mechanistic biomarkers included analysis of Interleukin 1 Beta, Interleukin 10, Interleukin 15, Interleukin 17 Alpha, Interleukin 17F, Interleukin 8 and Tumor Necrosis Factor. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. NA indicates that data is not available since 100% of the data was below limit of quantification at all time points. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  18. Change From Baseline in Safety Biomarkers: 3B-Cholestenoic Acid, Surfactant Protein D [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Safety biomarkers included analysis of 3B-Cholestenoic Acid and Surfactant Protein D. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  19. Change From Baseline in Safety Biomarkers: KL-6 Antigen [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Safety biomarker included analysis of KL-6 Antigen. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) [ Time Frame: Up to 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. An AESI include serious infections, opportunistic infections, neutropenia, respiratory events, pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, hypersensitivity reactions, injection site reactions, persistent cough or dyspnea.

  2. Number of Participants Who Tested Positive for Anti-GSK3196165 Binding Antibody Detection at Any Time Post-Baseline [ Time Frame: Up to 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    Immunogenicity samples for determination of anti-drug-antibody (ADA) were collected. The presence of treatment emergent ADA was determined using a GSK3196165 bridging style ADA assay with a bio-analytically determined cut point determined during assay validation. Samples taken after dosing with GSK3196165 that had a value at or above the cut-point was considered potentially treatment-emergent ADA-positive. The immunogenicity population consisted of all participants in the ITT population, who had at least one valid immunogenicity assessment.

  3. Change From Baseline in Synovitis as Assessed by Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) in the Most Affected Hand/Wrist [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    For synovitis a total of 8 joints were evaluated. Individual joint scores range from 0-3, where 0= normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe. The final synovitis score is the sum of the individual joint scores. Total score range from 0 (best) to 24 (worst). If an individual location is scored either 'Not Visible' or 'Surgically Modified' then the score for that location was set to missing. Missing joint scores was imputed as the mean of the non-missing joint scores. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose value from the Baseline value. Repeated measures analysis adjusted for synovitis score baseline value, treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Data has been presented for Median and 95% credible interval. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  4. Change From Baseline in Osteitis as Assessed by OMERACT RAMRI Scoring System in the Most Affected Hand/Wrist [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    For bone edema/osteitis a total of 25 locations was evaluated. Individual location scores ranged from 0-3, where, 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100% of bone edematous. Final bone edema/osteitis score is sum of individual location scores. Total score ranged from 0 (best) to 75 (worst). Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. If an individual location was scored either 'Not Visible' or 'Surgically Modified' or 'Not Assessable' then the score for that location was set to be missing. Missing joint scores was imputed as mean of non-missing location scores. Repeated measures analysis adjusted for Bone Edema/Osteitis Score baseline value, treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  5. Change From Baseline in Erosion as Assessed by OMERACT RAMRI Scoring System in the Most Affected Hand/Wrist [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    For bone erosion a total of 25 locations were evaluated. Individual location scores range from 0-10, where, 0: no erosion; 1: 1-10% of bone eroded and 10: 91-100% of bone eroded. The final bone erosion score is the sum of the individual location scores. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 250 (worst). If an individual location was scored either 'Not Visible' or 'Surgically Modified' or 'Not Assessable' then the score for that location was set to be missing. Missing joint scores was imputed as the mean of the non-missing location scores. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose value from the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for Bone Erosion Score baseline value, treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles.

  6. Change From Baseline in Synovitis as Assessed by Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Quantitative (RAMRIQ) Assessment in the Most Affected Hand/Wrist [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12 and 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    RAMRIQ is an automated volume quantification assessment. RAMRIQ assessed same pathologies and joints (except metacarpophalangeal joint [MCP1]) as RAMRIS allowing for direct comparison of results obtained using the two methods. Bones were automatically identified in pre-contrast, coronal T1 images using active appearance modelling (AAMs). Joint capsules and soft tissues were also segmented with AAMs, providing consistent 3D regions of interest (ROI) for synovial enhancement across all time points. Synovial volume was calculated as voxels that enhance within each ROI. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose value from the Baseline value. Repeated measures analysis adjusted for Synovitis baseline value, treatment group, disease duration (<=2 or >2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  7. Change From Baseline in Osteitis as Assessed by RAMRIQ Assessment in the Most Affected Hand/Wrist [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12 and 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    RAMRIQ is an automated volume quantification assessment for edema volume. RAMRIQ assessed the same pathologies and joints (except MCP1) as RAMRIS, allowing for direct comparison of results obtained using the two methods. Bones were automatically identified in pre-contrast, coronal T1 images using AAMs. Joint capsules and soft tissues were also segmented with AAMs, providing consistent 3D ROI for synovial enhancement across all time points. Edema volume was defined as non-erosion contrast-enhancing voxels inside the bone. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose value from the Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).

  8. Change From Baseline in Erosion as Assessed by RAMRIQ Assessment in the Most Affected Hand/Wrist [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12 and 12-Week FU (Week 22) ]
    RAMRIQ is an automated volume quantification assessment for erosion volume. RAMRIQ assessed the same pathologies and joints (except MCP1) as RAMRIS, allowing for direct comparison of results obtained using the two methods. Bones were automatically identified in pre-contrast, coronal T1 images using AAMs. Joint capsules and soft tissues were also segmented with AAMs, providing consistent 3D ROI for synovial enhancement across all time points. Erosion volume was identified inside the bone surfaces using voxel-based classification. The volume of BME and erosions was normalised to total bone volume for statistical analysis. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose value from the Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >=18 years at the time of signing informed consent.
  • Meets American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 RA Classification Criteria AND subject not diagnosed before age of 16 years.
  • Functional class I, II or III defined by the 1992 ACR Classification of Functional Status in RA.
  • Active disease as defined by:

    • Swollen joint count of >=4 (66-joint count) and tender joint count of >=4 (68-joint count) at screening and Day 1.

AND • Disease activity score for 28 different joints with C-reactive protein (CRP) value (DAS28[CRP]) >=3.2 at screening.

AND

• CRP >=3.0 milligrams (mg)/liter (L).

  • Signs of inflammation such as synovitis in the MRI scan of the most-affected hand.
  • Must be currently taking MTX (15-25 mg weekly) (oral/injected) for at least 12 weeks before screening, with no change in route of administration, with a stable and tolerated dose for >=4 weeks prior to Day 1. A stable dose of MTX >=7.5 mg/week is acceptable, if the MTX dose has been reduced for reasons of documented intolerance to MTX, example (e.g.) hepatic or hematologic toxicity, or per local requirement.
  • Body weight >=45 kilograms (kg).
  • Male or female subjects are eligible to participate so long as they meet and agree to abide by the contraceptive criteria.
  • Capable of giving signed informed consent as described in protocol which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form and in the protocol.
  • Willing to continue or initiate treatment with oral folic acid (at least 5 mg/week) or equivalent and be treated during the entire study (mandatory co-medication for MTX treatment).
  • Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) >=60% predicted; forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) >=70% predicted.
  • No evidence of active or latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating, or women planning to become pregnant or initiating breastfeeding.
  • History of other inflammatory rheumatologic or autoimmune disorders, other than Sjögren's syndrome secondary to RA.
  • History of any respiratory disease which (in the opinion of the investigator) would compromise subject safety or the ability of the subject to complete the study (e.g. significant interstitial lung disease, such as pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), moderate-severe asthma, bronchiectasis, previous pulmonary alveolar proteinosis [PAP]).
  • Clinically-significant (in the opinion of the investigator) persistent cough or clinically significant or unstable dyspnea that is unexplained.
  • Significant unstable or uncontrolled acute or chronic disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, could confound the results of the study or put the subject at undue risk.
  • A history of malignancy.
  • Contraindication to MRI scanning.
  • Current/previous Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 or 2 infection.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02799472


Locations
United States, California
GSK Investigational Site
El Cajon, California, United States, 92020
United States, Florida
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33309
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, United States, 33015
GSK Investigational Site
Pinellas Park, Florida, United States, 33781
United States, Illinois
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60616
United States, Pennsylvania
GSK Investigational Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States, 16635
United States, Tennessee
GSK Investigational Site
Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38119
United States, Texas
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, United States, 77024
Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Freiburg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany, 79106
GSK Investigational Site
Erfurt, Thueringen, Germany, 99096
GSK Investigational Site
Puettlingen, Germany, 66346
Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Elblag, Poland, 82-300
GSK Investigational Site
Nowa Sol, Poland, 67-100
GSK Investigational Site
Piaseczno, Poland, 05-500
GSK Investigational Site
Warszawa, Poland, 00-660
GSK Investigational Site
Warszawa, Poland, 03-291
GSK Investigational Site
Wroclaw, Poland, 51-128
Sponsors and Collaborators
GlaxoSmithKline
Parexel
Investigators
Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials GlaxoSmithKline
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by GlaxoSmithKline:
Study Protocol  [PDF] March 1, 2016
Statistical Analysis Plan  [PDF] November 28, 2017


Responsible Party: GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02799472     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 205180
First Posted: June 14, 2016    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: November 16, 2018
Last Update Posted: November 16, 2018
Last Verified: October 2018
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
Supporting Materials: Study Protocol
Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
Informed Consent Form (ICF)
Clinical Study Report (CSR)
Time Frame: IPD will be made available within 6 months of publishing the results of the primary endpoints of the study.
Access Criteria: Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.
URL: http://clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Keywords provided by GlaxoSmithKline:
GSK3196165
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF)
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Methotrexate

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Arthritis
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Joint Diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Rheumatic Diseases
Connective Tissue Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
Immune System Diseases
Methotrexate
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal
Abortifacient Agents
Reproductive Control Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
Antimetabolites
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Antineoplastic Agents
Dermatologic Agents
Enzyme Inhibitors
Folic Acid Antagonists
Immunosuppressive Agents
Immunologic Factors
Antirheumatic Agents
Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors