We're building a better ClinicalTrials.gov. Check it out and tell us what you think!
Try the New Site
We're building a modernized ClinicalTrials.gov! Visit Beta.ClinicalTrials.gov to try the new functionality.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide 1.8 mg/Day to Liraglutide 0.9 mg/Day in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02505334
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 22, 2015
Results First Posted : June 25, 2018
Last Update Posted : September 5, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Novo Nordisk A/S

Brief Summary:
This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of the trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of liraglutide 1.8 mg/day to liraglutide 0.9 mg/day in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Diabetes Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Drug: liraglutide Phase 3

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 635 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide 1.8 mg/Day to Liraglutide 0.9 mg/Day in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Actual Study Start Date : July 21, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date : May 2, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date : November 9, 2017

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

Drug Information available for: Liraglutide

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Liraglutide 1.8 mg
The total trial duration for the 1.8 mg/day treatment arm will be approximately 67 weeks, consisting of 2 weeks screening period, a 12 weeks run-in period, a 26-week main treatment period, a safety extension period of 26 weeks and a follow-up visit.
Drug: liraglutide
Injected subcutaneously s.c. (under the skin) once daily.

Active Comparator: Liraglutide 0.9 mg
The total trial duration for the 0.9 mg/day treatment arm will be approximately 41 weeks, consisting of 2 weeks screening period, a 12 weeks run-in period, a 26-week treatment period, and a follow-up visit.
Drug: liraglutide
Injected subcutaneously s.c. (under the skin) once daily.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) (Week 26) [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was evaluated after 26 weeks of treatment. The change from baseline in the response after 26 weeks of treatment is analysed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline response as a covariate.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in HbA1c (Week 52) [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c was evaluated after 52 weeks of treatment.

  2. Responder for HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Reported results are number of subjects who achieved HbA1c target below 7.0% after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  3. Responder for HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Reported results are number of subjects who achieved HbA1c target below or equal to 6.5% after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  4. Responder for HbA1c Below 7.0% Without Weight Gain [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Reported results are number of subjects who achieved HbA1c target below 7.0% without weight gain after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  5. Responder for HbA1c Below 7.0% Without Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Reported results are subjects with HbA1c <7.0% after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively without treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes. Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: severe as per ADA classification or BG confirmed by plasma glucose (PG) value <3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Severe hypoglycaemia as per ADA: episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate/glucagon, or take other corrective actions. PG levels may not be available during an event, but neurological recovery following the return of PG to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low PG level. Treatment emergent: episode with onset date on or after randomisation (from week (wk)0) and no later than 7 days after the last day on liraglutide (maximum till wk26+7days and wk52+7days). Hence, the following shown 'Time Frame' should be read as 'Wk26+7days and Wk52+7days'

  6. Change in Self-Measured Blood Glucose (SMBG) 7-point Profile: 7-point Profile (Individual Points in the Profile) [ Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 26 and Week 52 ]

    Reported results are 7-point SMBG values at week 0, week 26 and week 52. The 7-point profile blood glucose levels were measured at the following time points always starting with the first:

    1. Before breakfast.
    2. 90 minutes after start of breakfast.
    3. Before lunch.
    4. 90 minutes after start of lunch.
    5. Before dinner.
    6. 90 minutes after start of dinner.
    7. At bedtime.

  7. Change in SMBG 7-point Profile: Mean of 7-point Profile [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in mean of the SMBG 7-point profile was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  8. Change in SMBG 7-point Profile: Mean of Postprandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Minutes After for Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner) [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in mean of postprandial increments (from before meal to 90 minutes after for breakfast, lunch and dinner) of the SMBG 7-point profile was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  9. Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in FPG was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  10. Change in Waist Circumference [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumference was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  11. Change in Body Weight [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  12. Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in BMI was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  13. Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic) [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  14. Fasting C-peptide [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Fasting C-peptide was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  15. Fasting Insulin [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Fasting insulin was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  16. Fasting Glucagon [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Fasting glucagon was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  17. Proinsulin [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Proinsulin was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  18. Proinsulin/Insulin [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Proinsulin/insulin was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  19. Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    HOMA-B was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively. HOMA-B is an index of beta-cell function and was calculated as: HOMA-B=[(20 x fasting insulin in µU/mL)/(FPG in mmol/L-3.5)].

  20. Homeostasis Model Assessment as an Index of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    HOMA-IR was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively. HOMA-IR is an index of insulin resistance and was calculated as: HOMA-IR= fasting insulin (μU/mL) x FPG (mmol/L)/22.5.

  21. Total Cholesterol [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Total cholesterol was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  22. Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    LDL was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  23. High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    HDL was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  24. Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    VLDL was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  25. Triglycerides [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Triglycerides were evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  26. Free Fatty Acids [ Time Frame: Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Free fatty acids were evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  27. Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events [ Time Frame: Weeks 0-26 and Weeks 0-52 ]
    Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated during the 26-week and 52-week treatment period, respectively. TEAE for weeks 0-26: Event that has onset date on or after randomisation (from week 0) and no later than seven days after the last day on liraglutide (maximum till week 26 + 7 days). TEAE for weeks 0-52: Event that has onset date on or after randomisation (from week 0) and no later than seven days after the last day on liraglutide (maximum till week 52 + 7 days). Hence, the following shown 'Time Frame' should be read as 'Weeks 0-26 + 7 days and Weeks 0-52 + 7 days'.

  28. Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes [ Time Frame: Weeks 0-26 and Weeks 0-52 ]
    Treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were evaluated during the 26-week and 52-week treatment period, respectively. Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia (hypo):An episode that was severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a PG value <3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypo. ADA definition of severe hypo:episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate/glucagon, or take other corrective actions. PG levels may not be available during an event, but neurological recovery following the return of PG to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low PG level. Treatment emergent: episode with onset date on or after randomisation (from week (wk) 0) and no later than 7 days after the last day on liraglutide (maximum till wk 26 and wk 52, respectively + 7 days). Hence, the following shown 'Time Frame' should be read as 'wk 0-26+7 days and wk 0-52+7 days'.

  29. Number of Treatment Emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes [ Time Frame: Weeks 0-26 and Weeks 0-52 ]
    Treatment emergent nocturnal severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were evaluated during the26-week and 52-week treatment period, respectively. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes: Those occurring between 00:01 and 05:59 hours, both inclusive. Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: episode that was severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a PG value <3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Treatment emergent: episode with onset date on or after randomisation (from week 0) and no later than 7 days after the last day on liraglutide (maximum till week 26 and week 52, respectively + 7 days). Hence, the following shown 'Time Frame' should be read as 'Week 0-26 + 7 days and Week 0-52 + 7 days'.

  30. Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to ADA Definition [ Time Frame: Weeks 0-26 and Weeks 0-52 ]

    American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification of hypoglycaemia:

    1. Severe: Requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate/glucagon/take other corrective actions. PG levels may not be available during an event, but neurological recovery following return of PG to normal is considered sufficient evidence that event was induced by a low PG level.
    2. Documented symptomatic: PG level ≤3.9 mmol/L with symptoms.
    3. Asymptomatic: PG level ≤3.9 mmol/L without symptoms.
    4. Probable symptomatic: No measurement with symptoms.
    5. Pseudo: PG level >3.9 mmol/L with symptoms. Treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episode: episode with onset date on or after randomisation (from week 0) and no later than 7 days after the last day on liraglutide (maximum till week 26 and week 52, respectively + 7 days). Hence, the following shown 'Time Frame' should be read as 'Week 0-26 + 7 days and Week 0-52 + 7 days'.

  31. Change in Pulse [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in pulse was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  32. Change in Physical Examination [ Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 26 and Week 52 ]

    Reported results are physical examination outcomes at week (wk) 0, wk 26 and wk 52. Physical examination consisted of the following listed examinations and the outcome of each examination was evaluated as: 1) normal, 2) abnormal, not clinically significant (NCS) or 3) abnormal, clinically significant (CS).

    1. Cardiovascular system
    2. Central and peripheral nervous system (PNS)
    3. Gastrointestinal (GI) system including mouth
    4. General appearance
    5. Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck
    6. Lymph node palpation
    7. Musculoskeletal system
    8. Respiratory system
    9. Skin
    10. Thyroid gland

  33. Change in Eye Examination [ Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Reported results are eye examination (ophthalmoscopy) outcomes at week 0, week 26 and week 52. Ophthalmoscopy outcomes for both left and right eye were evaluated as: 1) normal, 2) abnormal, NCS or 3) abnormal, CS.

  34. Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG) [ Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Reported results are ECG outcomes at week 0, week 26 and week 52. ECG outcomes were evaluated as: 1) normal, 2) abnormal, NCS or 3) abnormal, CS.

  35. Change in Biochemistry: Creatinine [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in creatinine was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  36. Change in Biochemistry: eGFR [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively. eGFR was evaluated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula, mL/min/1.73m^2.

  37. Change in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in alanine aminotransferase was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  38. Change in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in aspartate aminotransferase was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  39. Change in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in alkaline phosphatase was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  40. Change in Biochemistry: Sodium [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in sodium was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  41. Change in Biochemistry: Potassium [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in potassium was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  42. Change in Biochemistry: Albumin [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in albumin was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  43. Change in Biochemistry: Total Bilirubin [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in total bilirubin was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  44. Change in Biochemistry: Urea [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in urea was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  45. Change in Biochemistry: Creatine Kinase [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in creatine kinase was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  46. Change in Biochemistry: Calcium [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in calcium was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  47. Change in Biochemistry: Albumin Corrected Calcium [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in albumin corrected calcium was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  48. Change in Biochemistry: Amylase [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in amylase was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  49. Change in Biochemistry: Lipase [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in lipase was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  50. Change in Haematology: Haemoglobin [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in haemoglobin was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  51. Change in Haematology: Haematocrit [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26, Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in haematocrit was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively. Haematocrit is the ratio of the volume of red blood cells to the total volume of blood.

  52. Change in Haematology: Thrombocytes [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in thrombocytes (platelets) was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  53. Change in Haematology: Erythrocytes [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in erythrocytes was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  54. Change in Haematology: Leukocytes [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in leukocytes was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  55. Change in Haematology: Eosinophils [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in eosinophils was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  56. Change in Haematology: Neutrophils [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in neutrophils was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  57. Change in Haematology: Basophils [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in basophils was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  58. Change in Haematology: Monocytes [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in monocytes was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  59. Change in Haematology: Lymphocytes [ Time Frame: Week 0, Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Change from baseline (week 0) in lymphocytes was evaluated after 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively.

  60. Change in Calcitonin [ Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 26 and Week 52 ]
    Reported results are number of subjects with low, normal or high calcitonin values at week 0, week 26 and week 52. Number of subjects analyzed = number of subjects contributed to the analysis for individual time point. Calcitonin values were categorised as low, normal or high.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   20 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female Japanese subjects at least 20 years of age at the time of informed consent
  • Type 2 diabetes subjects (diagnosed clinically) for at least 6 months prior to screening
  • HbA1c 7.5-10.0% [58 mmol/mol-86 mmol/mol] (both inclusive)
  • Subjects on stable therapy with one OAD (oral antidiabetic drug) (stable therapy is defined as unchanged medication and unchanged dose) for for at least 60 days before screening according to approved Japanese labelling

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with insulin within 12 weeks prior to screening
  • Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes or obesity other than stated in the inclusion criteria in a period of 60 days before screening
  • Screening calcitonin equal or above 50 ng/l
  • History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic)
  • Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN 2)
  • Subjects presently classified as being in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV
  • Within the past 180 days any of the following: myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalisation for unstable angina and/or transient ischemic attack
  • Diagnosis of malignant neoplasms within the last 5 years (except basal and squamous cell skin cancer, polyps and in-situ carcinomas)
  • Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator might jeopardise subject's safety or compliance with the protocol

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02505334


Locations
Layout table for location information
Japan
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Annaka-shi, Gunma, Japan, 379 0116
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chitose, Hokkaido, Japan, 066-0032
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chuo-ku Tokyo, Japan, 103-0027
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 103 0002
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 103 0027
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chuo-ku,, Japan, 104 0061
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, Japan
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Higashiosaka-shi, Osaka, Japan
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hokkaido, Japan, 078-8236
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ichikawa-shi, Chiba, Japan
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Iruma-shi, Saitama, Japan, 358 0011
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Izumisano-shi, Japan, 598 0048
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kashiwara-shi, Osaka, Japan, 582 0005
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kawagoe-shi, Saitama, Japan, 350 0851
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kobe-shi, Hyogo, Japan
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kumamoto-shi,Kumamoto, Japan, 862 0976
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Mito-shi, Ibaraki, Japan, 310-0845
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Mito-shi, Ibaraki, Japan
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Miyazaki-shi, Japan, 880 0034
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Naka-shi, Ibaraki, Japan, 311 0113
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Neyagawa-shi, Osaka, Japan
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Nishinomiya-shi, Hygo, Japan, 662 0971
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Nishinomiya-shi, Hyogo, Japan, 663-8501
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Oita-shi, Japan, 870 0039
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Okawa-shi, Fukuoka, Japan, 831 0016
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan, 553 0003
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan, 5590012
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Oyama-shi, Tochigi, Japan, 323 0022
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Saga-shi,Saga, Japan, 849 0937
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido, Japan, 060 0062
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido, Japan, 060-0001
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido, Japan, 062 0007
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sappro-shi, Hokkaido, Japan, 060 8648
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, Japan, 329 0433
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-0008
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Shizuoka-shi, Japan, 424 0853
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Suita-shi, Osaka, Japan, 565-0853
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Takatsuki-shi, Osaka, Japan, 569 1096
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tokyo, Japan, 103-0028
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tokyo, Japan, 105-8471
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tokyo, Japan, 123-0845
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tokyo, Japan, 144-0051
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tokyo, Japan, 169-0073
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tokyo, Japan, 181-0013
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan, 236-0004
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Yokohama-shi Kanagawa, Japan, 232-0064
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Yokohama-shi, Japan, 235 0045
Sponsors and Collaborators
Novo Nordisk A/S
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Clinical Reporting Anchor and Disclosure 1452 Novo Nordisk A/S
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by Novo Nordisk A/S:
Study Protocol  [PDF] April 10, 2018
Statistical Analysis Plan  [PDF] April 10, 2018

Additional Information:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Novo Nordisk A/S
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02505334    
Other Study ID Numbers: NN2211-4174
U1111-1164-5462 ( Other Identifier: WHO )
JapicCTI-152975 ( Registry Identifier: JAPIC )
First Posted: July 22, 2015    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: June 25, 2018
Last Update Posted: September 5, 2018
Last Verified: July 2018
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: According to the Novo Nordisk disclosure commitment on novonordisk-trials.com
URL: http://www.novonordisk-trials.com/website/content/how-to-access-clinical-trial-datasets.aspx

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: Yes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Glucose Metabolism Disorders
Metabolic Diseases
Endocrine System Diseases
Liraglutide
Hypoglycemic Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Incretins
Hormones
Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists