Study to Evaluate Safety & Efficacy of Sarecycline in Treatment of Acne
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02320149 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : December 19, 2014
Results First Posted : May 17, 2018
Last Update Posted : February 15, 2019
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Acne Vulgaris | Drug: Sarecycline Drug: Placebo | Phase 3 |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 968 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Double (Participant, Investigator) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebocontrolled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 1.5 mg/kg Per Day of Sarecycline Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris |
Actual Study Start Date : | December 18, 2014 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | February 1, 2017 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | February 1, 2017 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Sarecycline
Sarecycline tablets, 1.5 milligram(mg)/kilogram(kg)/day, taken orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Drug: Sarecycline
1.5 mg/kg/day taken orally at the same time each day, |
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo-matching sarecycline tablets, taken orally once daily for 12 weeks.
|
Drug: Placebo
Placebo-matching sarecycline tablets taken orally at the same time each day. |
- Absolute Change in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 centimeter (cm) in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Percentage of Participants With Investigator Global Assement (IGA) Success at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12 ]The investigator assessed the participant's inflammatory lesions on the face using the IGA 5-point scale. The scale ranges from 0 (best): clear, no evidence of papules or pustules to 4 (worst): severe, inflammatory lesions are more apparent, many papules/pustules, there may or may not be a few nodulocytic lesions. Success was defined as at least a 2-point decrease (improvement) from Baseline on the IGA assessment as well as a score of clear (0) or almost clear (1). The percentage of participants who achieved success is reported.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 centimeter (cm) in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 9 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 9 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 centimeter (cm) in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 6 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 centimeter (cm) in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 3 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 centimeter (cm) in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 9 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 9 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 6 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 3 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Inflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: papule: a solid, elevated lesion < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; pustule: an elevated lesion containing pus < 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection) with surrounding erythematous halo; nodule: palpable solid erythematous lesion > 0.5 cm in diameter (by inspection); has depth, not necessarily elevated. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of inflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Noninflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Noninflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: open comedones (blackheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a dilated/open orifice, black in color; closed comedones (whiteheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a small (microscopic) opening at the surface of the skin. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of noninflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Noninflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 9 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 9 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Noninflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: open comedones (blackheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a dilated/open orifice, black in color; closed comedones (whiteheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a small (microscopic) opening at the surface of the skin. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of noninflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Noninflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 6 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Noninflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: open comedones (blackheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a dilated/open orifice, black in color; closed comedones (whiteheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a small (microscopic) opening at the surface of the skin. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of noninflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Facial Noninflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 3 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Noninflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: open comedones (blackheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a dilated/open orifice, black in color; closed comedones (whiteheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a small (microscopic) opening at the surface of the skin. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of noninflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Noninflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Noninflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: open comedones (blackheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a dilated/open orifice, black in color; closed comedones (whiteheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a small (microscopic) opening at the surface of the skin. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of noninflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Noninflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 9 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 9 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Noninflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: open comedones (blackheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a dilated/open orifice, black in color; closed comedones (whiteheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a small (microscopic) opening at the surface of the skin. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of noninflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Noninflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 6 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Noninflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: open comedones (blackheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a dilated/open orifice, black in color; closed comedones (whiteheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a small (microscopic) opening at the surface of the skin. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of noninflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
- Absolute Change From Baseline in Facial Noninflammatory Lesion Counts at Week 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 3 ]Facial area lesion counts were made at the forehead, left and right cheeks, nose, and chin at baseline and at each treatment period visit. Noninflammatory lesion counts were based on the following definitions: open comedones (blackheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a dilated/open orifice, black in color; closed comedones (whiteheads): noninfected plugged hair follicle with a small (microscopic) opening at the surface of the skin. A negative change from Baseline indicates that the number of noninflammatory lesions decreased. Analyses were based on ANCOVA model for the endpoint with treatment group and pooled study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 9 Years to 45 Years (Child, Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Signed informed consent or assent form
- Male/female, 9 to 45 years of age, inclusive
- Body weight between 33 and 136 kg, inclusive
- Facial acne vulgaris with:
- 20-50 inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules and nodules) 30-100 noninflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones)
- No more than 2 nodules
- IGA score of moderate (3) or severe (4)
- Negative urine pregnancy test at baseline - females of childbearing potential
- Agrees to use an effective method of contraception throughout the study
- Refrain from use of any other acne medications and medicated cleansers, and avoid excessive sun exposure and tanning booths for duration of study
- Able to fulfill the requirements of protocol, indicated willingness to participate in the study and agrees to all study procedures (including mandatory photography) by providing written informed consent/assent and an authorization to disclose protected health information (PHI)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Has a dermatological condition of the face that could interfere with the clinical evaluations
- Has a history of any of the following:
- Allergy to tetracycline-class antibiotics or to any ingredient in the study drug
- Pseudomembranous colitis or antibiotic associated colitis
- Treated for any type of cancer within the last 6 months
- Has known resistance to other tetracyclines
- Has received any of the following treatments within 12 weeks of screening:
- Systemic retinoids
- Systemic corticosteroids
- Androgens/anti-androgenic therapy (eg, anabolic steroids, spironolactone)
- Non-medicated procedures for the treatment of acne (eg, laser, light or ThermaClear)
- Has used any acne affecting treatment without an appropriate washout period
- Has initiated hormonal contraceptive use within 12 weeks prior to screening or plans to initiate or switch hormonal contraceptive products during the study period
- Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy during the study period
- Has any other disorder causing hyperandrogenism including, but not limited to polycystic ovary syndrome, adrenal or ovarian tumors, Cushings disease or congenital adrenal hyperplasia
- Has drug-induced acne
- Has significant intercurrent illness, psychiatric disposition or other factors that, in the opinion of the Investigator or Medical Monitor, precludes participation in the study
- Is currently participating, or has participated within 30 days prior to the screening period in an investigational drug or device study
- Has previously participated in any clinical trial involving the use of sarecycline
- Is judged by the Investigator to be unsuitable for any reason

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02320149

United States, California | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #155) | |
Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90210 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #129) | |
Encino, California, United States, 91436 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #150) | |
La Mesa, California, United States, 91942 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #136) | |
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90045 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #147) | |
Sacramento, California, United States, 95819 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #123) | |
San Diego, California, United States, 92117 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #125) | |
San Diego, California, United States, 92123 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #139) | |
Santa Rosa, California, United States, 95403 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #157) | |
Tustin, California, United States, 92780 | |
United States, Colorado | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #122) | |
Denver, Colorado, United States, 80209 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #148) | |
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States, 80033 | |
United States, Connecticut | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #133) | |
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06511 | |
United States, Florida | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #130) | |
Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33486 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #152) | |
Boynton Beach, Florida, United States, 33437 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #102) | |
Miami, Florida, United States, 33025 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #145) | |
Miami, Florida, United States, 33175 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #140) | |
North Miami Beach, Florida, United States, 33162 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #151) | |
Orange Park, Florida, United States, 32073 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #108) | |
Sanford, Florida, United States, 32771 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #110) | |
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33409 | |
United States, Georgia | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #154) | |
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30328 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #120) | |
Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30909 | |
United States, Idaho | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #124) | |
Boise, Idaho, United States, 83704 | |
United States, Illinois | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #106) | |
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611 | |
United States, Indiana | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #112) | |
Plainfield, Indiana, United States, 46168 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #113) | |
South Bend, Indiana, United States, 46617 | |
United States, Kentucky | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #117) | |
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40217 | |
United States, Louisiana | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #135) | |
Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States, 70605 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #153) | |
Metairie, Louisiana, United States, 70006 | |
United States, Michigan | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #137) | |
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #111) | |
Warren, Michigan, United States, 48088 | |
United States, Missouri | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #119) | |
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63117 | |
United States, Nebraska | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #138) | |
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68114 | |
United States, Nevada | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #103) | |
Henderson, Nevada, United States, 89074 | |
United States, New Jersey | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #127) | |
Verona, New Jersey, United States, 07044 | |
United States, New York | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #146) | |
New York, New York, United States, 10016 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #132) | |
New York, New York, United States, 10075 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #134) | |
Smithtown, New York, United States, 11787 | |
United States, North Carolina | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #107) | |
High Point, North Carolina, United States, 27262 | |
United States, Ohio | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #126) | |
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45249 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #143) | |
Warren, Ohio, United States, 44483 | |
United States, Oregon | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #149) | |
Gresham, Oregon, United States, 97030 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #131) | |
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97210 | |
United States, South Carolina | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #114) | |
Greer, South Carolina, United States, 29650 | |
United States, Tennessee | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #128) | |
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37917 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #109) | |
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37215 | |
United States, Texas | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #116) | |
Austin, Texas, United States, 78759 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #104) | |
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75234 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #115) | |
El Paso, Texas, United States, 79902 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #142) | |
Houston, Texas, United States, 77004 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #105) | |
Houston, Texas, United States, 77056 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #101) | |
Plano, Texas, United States, 75093 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #118) | |
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229 | |
United States, Utah | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #156) | |
Layton, Utah, United States, 84041 | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #141) | |
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84117 | |
United States, Virginia | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #121) | |
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22911 | |
United States, Washington | |
Warner Chilcott Research Site (Site #144) | |
Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204 |
Study Director: | Alexandre Kaoukhov, MD | Warner Chilcott, an Affiliate of Allergan plc |
Documents provided by Almirall, S.A.:
Responsible Party: | Almirall, S.A. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02320149 History of Changes |
Obsolete Identifiers: | NCT02651012 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
SC1401 |
First Posted: | December 19, 2014 Key Record Dates |
Results First Posted: | May 17, 2018 |
Last Update Posted: | February 15, 2019 |
Last Verified: | January 2019 |
acne |
Acne Vulgaris Acneiform Eruptions Skin Diseases Sebaceous Gland Diseases |
Sarecycline Anti-Bacterial Agents Anti-Infective Agents Dermatologic Agents |