Feasibility Study of Remote Support for Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG)/Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Implant
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01809652|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : March 13, 2013
Last Update Posted : April 24, 2014
The purpose of this study is to gain real world, live implant experience with the remote implant support system. This system is intended to provide the technical support for device implants from a remote location through telepresence (audio and video) and remote control. Specifically, the goals of this study are to corroborate bench testing, assess the performance of the system, gain understanding of the workflows, customer experience, and logistics.
The intent of the remote support model is to provide the same support that would typically be provided by a local support person, only remotely. As such, the remote support person would only perform actions that a local support person would routinely do under the direction of a physician. This may involve observing patient data, providing technical support and advice, and performing testing and device reprogramming via remote control of the programmer.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Bradycardia Sudden Cardiac Arrest||Other: Remote Implant Support Capability||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||37 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Primary Purpose:||Supportive Care|
|Official Title:||Remote Implant Support|
|Study Start Date :||December 2013|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||April 2014|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||April 2014|
Experimental: Remote Implant Support
Implant supported through remote implant support capability
Other: Remote Implant Support Capability
Use of audio and video telepresence and remote control of device programmer to allow implant to be supported from a remote location
- System Integrity [ Time Frame: At implant ]Percentage of patients whose implantable devices with clinically equivalent programming by remote support and local support.
- Successful Support [ Time Frame: At implant ]Percentage of implant attempts with successful support. If the local support person does not participate in any part of the surgery, other than observing, then the remote support will be called a success.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01809652
|United States, Tennessee|
|Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203|