Comparison Between a Standard Tube and the Ultra-thin Tritube for Intubation of the Trachea and for Maintaining Access to the Trachea After Anaesthesia, in Patients With an Expected Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy (Tritube)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03653039|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified January 2019 by Michael Seltz Kristensen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : August 31, 2018
Last Update Posted : January 7, 2019
Michael Seltz Kristensen
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Michael Seltz Kristensen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study
|Recruitment Status :||Unknown|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||March 2019|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||March 2019|
Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J; 8th International Neuromuscular Meeting. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Aug;51(7):789-808.
Kristensen MS, de Wolf MWP, Rasmussen LS. Ventilation via the 2.4 mm internal diameter Tritube(®) with cuff - new possibilities in airway management. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 Jul;61(6):580-589. doi: 10.1111/aas.12894. Epub 2017 Apr 23. Review.