Comparison Between a Standard Tube and the Ultra-thin Tritube for Intubation of the Trachea and for Maintaining Access to the Trachea After Anaesthesia, in Patients With an Expected Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy (Tritube)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03653039|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : August 31, 2018
Last Update Posted : January 7, 2019
Michael Seltz Kristensen
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Michael Seltz Kristensen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study
|Recruitment Status :||Recruiting|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||March 2019|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||March 2019|
Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J; 8th International Neuromuscular Meeting. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Aug;51(7):789-808.
Kristensen MS, de Wolf MWP, Rasmussen LS. Ventilation via the 2.4 mm internal diameter Tritube(®) with cuff - new possibilities in airway management. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 Jul;61(6):580-589. doi: 10.1111/aas.12894. Epub 2017 Apr 23. Review.