Safety and Efficacy Study to Evaluate Denosumab Compared With Zoledronic Acid in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01732770 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : November 26, 2012
Results First Posted : January 25, 2016
Last Update Posted : March 10, 2020
|
Sponsor:
Amgen
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Amgen
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Study Type | Interventional |
---|---|
Study Design | Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
Condition |
Post Menopausal Osteoporosis |
Interventions |
Biological: Denosumab Drug: Zoledronic Acid Drug: Placebo to Denosumab Drug: Placebo to Zoledronic Acid |
Enrollment | 643 |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | This study was conducted at 37 centers in Belgium, Denmark, Poland, Spain, Canada, United States of America, and Australia. The first participant enrolled on 07 November 2012 and the last participant enrolled on 15 January 2014. |
Pre-assignment Details | Participants were randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio to receive either denosumab or zoledronic acid. Randomization was stratified by screening serum type I collagen C-telopeptide (sCTX) values (< 0.3 ng/mL, 0.3 to 0.5 ng/mL). |
Arm/Group Title | Zoledronic Acid 5 mg Q12M | Denosumab 60 mg Q6M |
---|---|---|
![]() |
Participants received zoledronic acid 5 mg by intravenous infusion once every 12 months (Q12M) on Day 1 and placebo to denosumab by subcutaneous injection on Day 1 and at Month 6. | Participants received denosumab 60 mg subcutaneous injection once every 6 months (Q6M) for 12 months and placebo to zoledronic acid by intravenous infusion on Day 1. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
Started | 322 | 321 |
Received Study Treatment | 320 | 320 |
Completed | 312 | 313 |
Not Completed | 10 | 8 |
Reason Not Completed | ||
Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 3 |
Withdrawal by Subject | 5 | 3 |
Decision by Sponsor | 2 | 2 |
Death | 1 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Zoledronic Acid 5 mg Q12M | Denosumab 60 mg Q6M | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Participants received zoledronic acid 5 mg by intravenous infusion once every 12 months (Q12M) on Day 1 and placebo to denosumab by subcutaneous injection on Day 1 and at Month 6. | Participants received denosumab 60 mg subcutaneous injection once every 6 months (Q6M) for 12 months and placebo to zoledronic acid by intravenous infusion on Day 1. | Total of all reporting groups | |
Overall Number of Baseline Participants | 322 | 321 | 643 | |
![]() |
[Not Specified]
|
|||
Age, Continuous
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Years |
||||
Number Analyzed | 322 participants | 321 participants | 643 participants | |
69.5 (7.7) | 68.5 (7.1) | 69.0 (7.4) | ||
Sex: Female, Male
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||
Number Analyzed | 322 participants | 321 participants | 643 participants | |
Female |
322 100.0%
|
321 100.0%
|
643 100.0%
|
|
Male |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Measure Type: Number Unit of measure: Participants |
Number Analyzed | 322 participants | 321 participants | 643 participants |
White | 314 | 309 | 623 | |
Asian | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
Other | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Black or African American | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Multiple | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Screening serum CTX
Measure Type: Number Unit of measure: Participants |
Number Analyzed | 322 participants | 321 participants | 643 participants |
< 0.3 ng/mL | 242 | 239 | 481 | |
≥ 0.3 ng/mL | 78 | 82 | 160 | |
Missing | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-score
[1] Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: T-score |
||||
Number Analyzed | 322 participants | 321 participants | 643 participants | |
-2.64 (0.86) | -2.74 (0.83) | -2.69 (0.84) | ||
[1]
Measure Description: BMD was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine. The T-score is a comparison of a person's bone density with that of a healthy 30-year-old of the same sex. Lower scores (more negative) mean lower bone density: A T-score of -2.5 or lower qualifies as osteoporosis and a T-score of -1.0 to -2.5 signifies osteopenia, meaning below-normal bone density without full osteoporosis.
|
||||
Total Hip BMD T-score
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: T-score |
||||
Number Analyzed | 322 participants | 321 participants | 643 participants | |
-1.93 (0.80) | -1.93 (0.74) | -1.93 (0.77) | ||
Femoral Neck BMD T-score
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: T-score |
||||
Number Analyzed | 322 participants | 321 participants | 643 participants | |
-2.17 (0.68) | -2.17 (0.66) | -2.17 (0.67) | ||
Prior Oral Bisphosphonate Duration
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Years |
||||
Number Analyzed | 322 participants | 321 participants | 643 participants | |
6.35 (3.68) | 6.21 (3.84) | 6.28 (3.76) | ||
Historical Fractures
[1] Measure Type: Number Unit of measure: Participants |
Number Analyzed | 322 participants | 321 participants | 643 participants |
Any prior fracture | 159 | 169 | 328 | |
Prior osteoporotic fracture | 121 | 120 | 241 | |
[1]
Measure Description: An osteoporotic fracture is defined as a reported fracture excluding skull fracture, facial bones fracture, fingers fracture and toes fracture, fractures with high trauma severity, and pathological fractures.
|
||||
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Kg/m² |
||||
Number Analyzed | 322 participants | 321 participants | 643 participants | |
24.31 (4.18) | 24.27 (3.99) | 24.29 (4.08) |
Outcome Measures
Adverse Events
Limitations and Caveats
[Not Specified]
More Information
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts
the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
The Clinical Trial Agreement generally does not restrict an investigator's discussion of trial results after completion. The Agreement permits Amgen a limited period of time to review material discussing trial results (typically up to 45 days and possible extension). Amgen may remove confidential information, but authors have final control and approval of publication content. For multicenter studies, the investigator agrees not to publish any results before the first multi-center publication.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title: | Study Director |
Organization: | Amgen Inc. |
Phone: | 866-572-6436 |
Publications:
Responsible Party: | Amgen |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01732770 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
20110153 2012-001821-28 ( EudraCT Number ) |
First Submitted: | November 20, 2012 |
First Posted: | November 26, 2012 |
Results First Submitted: | December 9, 2015 |
Results First Posted: | January 25, 2016 |
Last Update Posted: | March 10, 2020 |