Clinical Comparison of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Fiber Posts or Cast Metal Posts

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01461239

Recruitment Status : Unknown

Verified April 2017 by Maximiliano Sergio Cenci, Federal University of Pelotas.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting

First Posted : October 28, 2011

Last Update Posted : April 6, 2017

Sponsor:

Collaborator:

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

Maximiliano Sergio Cenci, Federal University of Pelotas

No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study

About Study Results Reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov

Recruitment Status :	Unknown
Estimated Primary Completion Date :	December 2017
Estimated Study Completion Date :	July 2018

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):

Sarkis-Onofre R, Amaral Pinheiro H, Poletto-Neto V, Bergoli CD, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Randomized controlled trial comparing glass fiber posts and cast metal posts. J Dent. 2020 May;96:103334. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103334. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Opdam NJ, Kreulen CM, Huysmans MC, Pereira-Cenci T. Crown vs. composite for post-retained restorations: A randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2016 May;48:34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

To Top