Algorithm for Apherisis Monitoring and Prescription Assistance in Sickle Cell Patients (ALGODREP) (ALGODREP)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04076683 |
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified August 2019 by Etablissement Français du Sang.
Recruitment status was: Not yet recruiting
First Posted : September 3, 2019
Last Update Posted : September 3, 2019
|
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | August 26, 2019 | ||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | September 3, 2019 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | September 3, 2019 | ||||
Estimated Study Start Date ICMJE | November 2019 | ||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | November 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Number of patients with individually achieved objectives in terms of % HbS [ Time Frame: For each apherisis over a 12 months period ] | ||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Change History | No Changes Posted | ||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Algorithm for Apherisis Monitoring and Prescription Assistance in Sickle Cell Patients (ALGODREP) | ||||
Official Title ICMJE | Validation d'Une Stratégie de Programme Transfusionnel Par Erythraphérèse basée Sur un Algorithme d'Aide à la Prescription Transfusionnelle Chez Les Patients Adultes Drépanocytaires | ||||
Brief Summary | The main objective of this study is to prove the superiority of a procedure which calculates the volume of RBCs to transfuse and the time between apheresis based on this algorithm, compared to the current procedure. The primary endpoint would be the number of patients with individually achieved objectives in terms of % HbS before each apheresis (which reflects the effectiveness of the previous apheresis) over a period of 12 months. The secondary objectives would be to compare the volume differences of transfused RBCs in both groups over a period of 12 months, the occurrence of clinical events and the satisfaction of patients and physicians. The investigators hope that this study would improve the efficiency and the performance of apheresis in sickle cell patients. The investigators also hope to facilitate the organization of procedures with the flexibility that would allow the use of this algorithm. |
||||
Detailed Description | Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common genetic disease leading to abnormal hemoglobin (HbS). Chronic complications can be severe and affect multiple organs. Among them, cerebrovascular disease is one of the most serious leading to a high risk of stroke. These complications often require blood exchange transfusions (BET) in order to replace red blood cells (RBC) containing HbS (from patients) by GR containing HbA (blood donors), and thereby stop the harmful pathophysiological cascade. The indications of long-term apheresis are mostly, but not exclusively, represented by cerebral vasculopathy (85% in our center), and chronic organ damages. Long-term BET in cerebral vasculopathy may considerably reduce the risk of stroke while stopping them leads to a recurrence of this risk, hence there is a need to do them regularly (on average every 4 to 6 weeks) with an objective of HbS ≤ 30%. This objective may be less stringent in the case of other indications. Two methods are used: a manual method which is feasible anywhere and the apheresis which is preferred because of its better efficacy in achieving the targets of HbS percentage. It also limits transfusion hemochromatosis. The volume required for BET by apheresis as well as the optimal period between apheresis sessions are empirically determined. In our practice, the investigators noticed that this method did not allow to steadily obtaining the %HbS objective and the interval between apheresis was variable, in part conditioned by the availability of machines. This implies a real risk of occurrence of recurrent stroke in patients with cerebral vascular disease and may cause a lack of flexibility in the timing of appointments. Thereby the principal investigator and the biostatistician created an algorithm to compute the volume of blood to be transfused and the interval between apheresis which are necessary to maintain an individual objective of HbS percentage. This algorithm has been obtained by statistical analysis of apheresis performed at Henri Mondor Hospital over a period of 3 years. |
||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single (Participant) Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
||||
Condition ICMJE | Sickle Cell Disease | ||||
Intervention ICMJE | Device: Algodrep
Algorithm computing the volume of blood to be transfused and the interval between apheresis which are necessary to maintain an individual objective of HbS percentage.
|
||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||
Publications * |
|
||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Unknown status | ||||
Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
65 | ||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Estimated Study Completion Date ICMJE | November 2021 | ||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | November 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | France, Martinique | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT04076683 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 2016-A01411-50 | ||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||
Current Responsible Party | Etablissement Français du Sang | ||||
Original Responsible Party | Same as current | ||||
Current Study Sponsor ICMJE | Etablissement Français du Sang | ||||
Original Study Sponsor ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Collaborators ICMJE |
|
||||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
PRS Account | Etablissement Français du Sang | ||||
Verification Date | August 2019 | ||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |