Lung Concentrations of Ceftazidime in Patients With Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (CEFTALC)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02837835 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : July 20, 2016
Last Update Posted : July 20, 2016
|
Tracking Information | |||
---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | July 13, 2016 | ||
First Posted Date ICMJE | July 20, 2016 | ||
Last Update Posted Date | July 20, 2016 | ||
Study Start Date ICMJE | March 2005 | ||
Actual Primary Completion Date | February 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
lung tissue concentration of ceftazidime [ Time Frame: up to 44 hours ] | ||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||
Change History | No Changes Posted | ||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||
Descriptive Information | |||
Brief Title ICMJE | Lung Concentrations of Ceftazidime in Patients With Ventilator-associated Pneumonia | ||
Official Title ICMJE | Comparison of Lung Concentrations of Ceftazidime Administered by Continuous Versus Intermittent Infusion in Patients With Ventilator-associated Pneumonia | ||
Brief Summary | Ceftazidime is a beta-lactam compound that exerts a time-dependent bactericidal effect. Numerous arguments are in favor of continuous administration of ceftazidime, both for reasons of clinical efficacy and to preserve bacteriological mutation. The investigators report a prospective, single-center, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial comparing two modes of administration of ceftazidime, namely, continuous administration (loading dose of 20 mg/kg of body weight followed by 60 mg/kg/day) versus intermittent administration (20 mg/kg over 30 min every 8 h) in 34 patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia due to Gram-negative bacilli. The study was performed over 48 h with 13 and 18 assessments of serum ceftazidime in the continuous-infusion group (group A) and the intermittent-fusion group (group B), respectively. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed at steady state in both groups at 44 h to determine ceftazidime levels in the epithelial lining fluid. The investigators chose a predefined threshold of 20 mg/liter for serum concentrations of ceftazidime because of ecological conditions in our center. | ||
Detailed Description | Primary objective The main objective of this study is to show the continuous administration of superiority ceftazidime versus intermittent administration, in terms of lung tissue concentration of ceftazidime in mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia caused by a bacillus gram negative. Methods Trial Prospective therapeutic trial in parallel groups, controlled, randomized, single center comparing two methods of administration of ceftazidime (continuous administration by self-pulsed syringe versus discontinuous administration regimens to 3 injections per 24 hours) in patients with severe pneumonia in mechanically ventilated due to gram negative bacillus. Population Patients will be enrolled in the Intensive Care Unit of the Reims university hospital. All patients meeting the inclusion criteria and respecting the criteria of non-inclusions (see below) will be consecutively enrolled in the study after obtaining consent. The allocation of one of the 2 treatment modality will be made by randomization. Variables and parameters collected in the study: In addition to sociodemographic variables, variables for inclusion in the study and judgment criteria, different blood and urine tests will be collected:
|
||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||
Study Phase ICMJE | Phase 3 | ||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||
Condition ICMJE | Pneumonia | ||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||
Publications * | Cousson J, Floch T, Guillard T, Vernet V, Raclot P, Wolak-Thierry A, Jolly D. Lung concentrations of ceftazidime administered by continuous versus intermittent infusion in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Apr;59(4):1905-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04232-14. Epub 2015 Jan 12. | ||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||
Recruitment Information | |||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
34 | ||
Original Actual Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | February 2008 | ||
Actual Primary Completion Date | February 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | France | ||
Removed Location Countries | |||
Administrative Information | |||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT02837835 | ||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 104R04 | ||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Not Provided | ||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | ||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE | Not Provided | ||
Responsible Party | CHU de Reims | ||
Study Sponsor ICMJE | CHU de Reims | ||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||
Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||
PRS Account | CHU de Reims | ||
Verification Date | July 2016 | ||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |