Macitentan in Pulmonary Hypertension of Sickle Cell Disease (MENSCH)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02651272 |
Recruitment Status :
Terminated
(Unable to enroll IRB approved sample of participants.)
First Posted : January 8, 2016
Results First Posted : December 8, 2020
Last Update Posted : December 8, 2020
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | January 6, 2016 | ||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | January 8, 2016 | ||||
Results First Submitted Date ICMJE | October 22, 2020 | ||||
Results First Posted Date ICMJE | December 8, 2020 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | December 8, 2020 | ||||
Study Start Date ICMJE | July 2015 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | December 18, 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events [ Time Frame: 20 weeks ] The occurrence of treatment emergent AEs includes having any of the following: vaso-occlusive crises requiring hospitalization; acute congestive heart failure; hypotension (defined as a mean arterial pressure less than 60mmHg); decrease in hemoglobin concentration by greater than 1 g/dL.
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] [ Time Frame: Baseline to Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit (Apx Wk 20) ] Assess the rate of adverse and serious adverse events in SCD patients taking macitentan
|
||||
Change History | |||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Macitentan in Pulmonary Hypertension of Sickle Cell Disease | ||||
Official Title ICMJE | The Safety and Efficacy of Macitentan for Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension in Sickle Cell Disease | ||||
Brief Summary | This is a pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of macitentan in patients with pulmonary hypertension of sickle cell disease. This study will enroll approximately 10 subjects. Study participation for each subject will last approximately 24 weeks from screening to end of treatment follow-up. | ||||
Detailed Description | Background and Rationale: Sickle cell disease (SCD) affects 250,000 births per year worldwide, with 70-80,000 patients currently residing in the US. Although classically thought of as a genetic hemoglobinopathy, most of the clinical complications are vascular in etiology and pulmonary manifestations are the primary cause of morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary hypertension (PH), one such pulmonary complication, occurs in 6-10.5% of SCD adults and is associated with a 60% four-year survival. No specific therapy for PH in SCD exists representing an area of intense clinical need in this field. Clinical trials of pulmonary vasodilator medications in PH of SCD have been problematic. There have been no randomized placebo controlled trials of any traditional pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) medication completed in this population to date. Three randomized placebo-controlled trials have been undertaken previously. Two compared treatment with bosentan to placebo in SCD patients with right heart catheterization (RHC) -defined elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) with a normal pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (the ASSET-1 trial) or pulmonary venous hypertension (PVH) with a PVR > 100 dynes.sec/cm5 (the ASSET-2 trial). After the randomization of only 14 subjects in ASSET-1 and 12 patients in ASSET-2, the trials were prematurely terminated due to slow patient enrollment. Although very few patients were enrolled, there were no apparent toxicity issues. The third trial, Walk-PHaSST (Pulmonary Hypertension and Sickle Cell Disease with Sildenafil Therapy), compared the safety and efficacy of sildenafil to placebo in SCD patients with a TRV ≥2.7m/s. After 74 (of a targeted 132) subjects were enrolled, the study was prematurely discontinued due to an increase in serious adverse events in the sildenafil group, primarily hospitalization for pain. There are a number of possible explanations for these failed trials:
Given the serious limitations of the randomized trials, our clinical guidelines committee decided that its judgments regarding whether targeted PAH therapy is indicated in SCD patients with an elevated PVR and normal PCWP should be informed by indirect evidence from Group 1 PAH populations and our own clinical experience. In Group 1 PAH patients, it has been well-established by meta-analyses of randomized trials that targeted PAH therapy consistently improves exercise capacity, functional status, symptoms, cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and outcome. This indirect evidence is supported by four case series in which SCD patients with RHC-confirmed pre-capillary PH received targeted PAH therapy with bosentan, sildenafil, and/or epoprostenol. Targeted PAH therapy was associated with improvement in exercise capacity, with the six minute walk distance increasing 41 to 144 m beyond baseline. There were also improvements in the mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), PVR, and cardiac index, although these parameters were measured in only a few patients. The magnitude of the benefits was greatest among symptomatic patients. The most common adverse effects were headache (15%) and peripheral edema (21%); transaminase elevation was reported in 14% of patients during endothelin receptor antagonist therapy. Based upon these results and the increased morbidity associated with sildenafil use, we are weakly recommending a trial of either a prostanoid or an endothelin receptor antagonist for select patients with SCD who have a RHC-confirmed marked elevation of their PVR, normal PCWP, and related symptoms. The FDA approval of macitentan for treatment of PAH represents a unique opportunity for study of the use of this medication in SCD. Endothelin-1 has long been established as an important mediator of vasoconstriction in SCD [19, 20] and more recent studies have implicated a role for this molecule in mouse models of PH in SCD [21]. PH and an elevated TRV are both independent risk factors for mortality in SCD [1, 2, 9, 22] and, as the median age of death of SCD patients is in the 5th decade irrespective of a PH diagnosis, the possibility of therapeutically altering this outcome is of key importance in this disease. With the publication of the American Thoracic Society sponsored clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of PH in SCD (additionally endorsed by the Pulmonary Hypertension Association and the American College of Chest Physicians), the timing for re-addressing the possibility of a clinical trial of a PAH therapy in this population perfect. We propose to utilize the information gathered from the trials which proceeded it to specifically design a clinical trial using macitentan to treat the SCD patients most likely to respond to this therapy; those with PAH-like hemodynamics without co-existent left-sided heart disease. Hypotheses:
Study Design: To conduct a 16 week prospective open-label Phase II clinical trial of macitentan in SCD patients with hemodynamics consistent with pulmonary arterial hypertension. We plan to enroll 10 patients in this study. All enrolled patients will be treated with 10 mg macitentan daily for the entire treatment period. The study is comprised of the three consecutive periods: Screening Period/Baseline Studies: This period will be up to 30 days in duration, commencing with the first screening visit and completing with the start of study medication. Treatment Period: This will begin at Visit 2, the baseline visit and will continue until the end of 16 weeks of therapy or earlier in the case of premature stoppage of treatment. During this period, there will be a safety assessment at the first visit followed by visits to assess safety and efficacy at weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16. Post-Treatment Study Period: This will last 30 days after the completion of the treatment period and will allow for additional assessment of medication safety. Screening Period: After obtaining informed consent, the patient will undergo the screening protocol which includes assessment of baseline demographics (sex, age, race, ethnicity, height, and body weight), as well as an assessment of why the female patients are not of child-bearing potential as appropriate. The following data will be obtained:
Baseline Visit (Day 1):
Week 4 visit:
Week 8 Visit:
Week 12:
Week 16:
Post-Treatment Follow-Up Visit: 1) Assessment of Adverse Events |
||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Phase 2 | ||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: N/A Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Masking Description: Study is Open Label Primary Purpose: Other
|
||||
Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
Intervention ICMJE | Drug: macitentan
10mg macitentan tablets
Other Name: opsumit
|
||||
Study Arms ICMJE | Experimental: macitentan
10mg macitentan tablets, taken once daily (QD), by mouth (PO), for the treatment period lasting 16 weeks.
Intervention: Drug: macitentan
|
||||
Publications * |
|
||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Terminated | ||||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
4 | ||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
10 | ||||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | December 18, 2019 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | December 18, 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT02651272 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | H-33165 | ||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||
Current Responsible Party | Boston University | ||||
Original Responsible Party | ElizabethKlings, Boston University, Associate Professor of Medicine | ||||
Current Study Sponsor ICMJE | Boston University | ||||
Original Study Sponsor ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Actelion | ||||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
PRS Account | Boston University | ||||
Verification Date | November 2020 | ||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |