Comparison of Two Methods of Transfusion for Stroke Prevention in Sickle Cell
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02561312 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : September 28, 2015
Last Update Posted : July 27, 2018
|
Tracking Information | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date | September 23, 2015 | |||
First Posted Date | September 28, 2015 | |||
Last Update Posted Date | July 27, 2018 | |||
Actual Study Start Date | September 2015 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | September 30, 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Current Primary Outcome Measures |
Hemoglobin S, baseline hemoglobin/hematocrit, [ Time Frame: Pre Infusion, lab collected monthly for one year thru study completion ] Lab parameters pre-infusion for each method of transfusion
|
|||
Original Primary Outcome Measures | Same as current | |||
Change History | ||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures |
Hemoglobin S, end of transfusion hemoglobin/hematocrit, blood volume, alloantibodies, [ Time Frame: Post Infusion, lab collected monthly for one year thru study completion ] Lab parameters post-infusion for each method of transfusion
|
|||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures | Same as current | |||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures |
|
|||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Same as current | |||
Descriptive Information | ||||
Brief Title | Comparison of Two Methods of Transfusion for Stroke Prevention in Sickle Cell | |||
Official Title | Comparison of Two Methods of Transfusion for Stroke Prevention in Sickle Cell | |||
Brief Summary | Chronic blood transfusions are essential supportive care for sickle cell patients at high risk for morbidity and mortality due to stroke. These patients, however, are at risk for iron overload. In the investigator's comprehensive sickle cell center, the investigators support chronic transfusion with rapid manual partial exchange transfusions (RMPET) using a single access central line port. The investigators do not have a comprehensive adult sickle cell program but upon transition of patients the patients would be provided simple transfusion (ST) in an adult ambulatory infusion setting due to nursing acuity needed for RMPET. The investigators plan to study the institution's participants currently on chronic transfusion support and compare different transfusion modalities to better understand the effects from switching from RMPET to ST. To date, there are no such comparisons within and between sickle cell patients in the literature. | |||
Detailed Description | II. Objective. Compare differences in RMPET versus ST. III. Specific Aims:
IV: Background/Significance: Stroke occurs in 10% of Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) patients before the age of 20 Years. Current standard of care for secondary overt stroke prevention in patients with SCD is chronic red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Stroke recurs in ~ 60% of patients without chronic RBC therapy and in ~ 20% of patients with chronic transfusion while maintaining a hemoglobin S percentage of less than 30%. Indefinite transfusion therapy is practiced as discontinuation after short-term or long-term prophylactic transfusions leads to recurrent overt strokes and more ensuing CNS damage, even with transition to hydroxyurea. Chronic transfusions also prevent initial stroke in high-risk patients identified by transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound. The Stroke Prevention Study in Sickle Cell Disease (STOP) demonstrated a 92% stroke risk reduction among 63 of 130 children with abnormal TCD results. Rates of stroke declined significantly since implementing routine TCD screening and primary prophylactic transfusion therapy. The subsequent STOP 2 trial supports the use of chronic transfusion indefinitely because discontinuation resulted in an increased rate of abnormal TCD conversion and development of overt stroke. Discontinuing transfusions on the STOP 2 trial was also associated with a higher occurrence of silent cerebral infarcts, documented in 3 of 37 patients (8.1%) in the continued-transfusion group compared with 11 of 40 (27.5%) in the transfusion-halted group. More recent studies demonstrate that SCD patients are also at risk for silent cerebral infarcts. An association between worsening vasculopathy shown by magnetic resonance angiography and progressive overt and silent infarcts on magnetic resonance imaging has been found. More aggressive magnetic resonance imaging screening may be indicated and this could result in more patients with SCD treated with chronic transfusion. Common chronic transfusion modalities include ST or RMPET. The goal of therapy is to reduce the hemoglobin S level either by diluting the blood (ST) or by removing and replacing the blood with non-sickle hemoglobin (RMPET). To prevent further brain injury, the goal of transfusion therapy is to lower the hemoglobin S quantification to less than 30% on a routine basis, usually monthly transfusion procedure. There are many large centers that utilize erythrocytapheresis which is considered the preferable method if available. The investigator's study will focus on the types of RBC exchange therapy currently utilized in the investigator's Infusion Clinic at T.C. Thompson Children's Hospital. The investigators will determine which transfusion method is best for each participant for achieving the hematologic parameters of lower hemoglobin S quantification.The investigators will also measure the amount of nursing time for each procedure and which method is preferred by participants. The investigators will share the institutional observations with other institutions who may intend to switch between RMPET and ST. V. Methods: Study Design: Prospective observational cohort study The investigators will utilize the institution's current population of 8 eligible chronically exchanged transfused participants at the T.C. Thompson Children's Infusion Clinic. The eligible participants will be invited to participate in a cross over design study so that each participant serves as its own control. Eight participants will be randomly assigned (blinded envelope) whereby four participants will start with rapid manual partial exchange transfusion: 3 months will be spent in a wash out period, then 3 months of data collection for RMPET. This group will then be switched to simple transfusion with a wash out period of three months, then data collection for three months. The second group of four participants will start with simple transfusion and have an identical study design over 12 months (3 months of collected data during simple transfusion, a 3 month wash out period, switch to rapid manual partial exchange transfusion for three months, then 3 months of data collection for RMPET). The investigators will optimize all therapy to achieve the post transfusion goal of <30% hemoglobin S and post transfusion Hb <12g/DL.with each transfusion performed for best practice in avoiding sickle cell complications. |
|||
Study Type | Observational | |||
Study Design | Observational Model: Case-Crossover Time Perspective: Prospective |
|||
Target Follow-Up Duration | Not Provided | |||
Biospecimen | Not Provided | |||
Sampling Method | Probability Sample | |||
Study Population | 8 chronically exchanged transfused participants at T.C. Thompson Children's Infusion Clinic with sickle cell disease (Hemoglobin SS or SBeta thalassemia) currently receiving rapid manual partial exchange transfusion. | |||
Condition |
|
|||
Intervention |
|
|||
Study Groups/Cohorts |
|
|||
Publications * |
|
|||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
||||
Recruitment Information | ||||
Recruitment Status | Completed | |||
Actual Enrollment |
9 | |||
Original Estimated Enrollment |
8 | |||
Actual Study Completion Date | September 30, 2017 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | September 30, 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Eligibility Criteria | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
|||
Sex/Gender |
|
|||
Ages | 3 Years to 25 Years (Child, Adult) | |||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | |||
Contacts | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | |||
Listed Location Countries | United States | |||
Removed Location Countries | ||||
Administrative Information | ||||
NCT Number | NCT02561312 | |||
Other Study ID Numbers | 15-084 | |||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | |||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | |||
IPD Sharing Statement | Not Provided | |||
Responsible Party | Jennifer Keates, M.D., Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority | |||
Study Sponsor | Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority | |||
Collaborators | Not Provided | |||
Investigators |
|
|||
PRS Account | Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority | |||
Verification Date | July 2018 |