Infrared Lymphangiography as a Method of Sentinel Node Identification (SPY-SN)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02057393 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : February 7, 2014
Results First Posted : June 6, 2017
Last Update Posted : July 6, 2017
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Tracking Information | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | January 24, 2014 | |||
First Posted Date ICMJE | February 7, 2014 | |||
Results First Submitted Date ICMJE | March 17, 2017 | |||
Results First Posted Date ICMJE | June 6, 2017 | |||
Last Update Posted Date | July 6, 2017 | |||
Study Start Date ICMJE | June 2014 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | January 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Equivalence of ICG and Real Time Lymphangiography to technetium99 and Blue Dye in Localizing Sentinel Nodes [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] The primary outcome measure is the accuracy of indocyanine green (ICG) and real time lymphangiography to identify sentinel nodes (SLN) in patients with melanoma, compared to tech99 and methylene blue. Tech99 is considered the standard, for comparison. Accuracy is being determined by the number of sentinel nodes that are identified with ICG, compared to tech99 or methylene blue.
|
|||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Equivalence of ICG and Real Time Lymphangiography to technetium99 and Blue Dye in Localizing Sentinel Nodes [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] The primary outcome measure is the ability of indocyanine green (ICG) and real time lymphangiography, technetium99 and methylene blue to identify sentinel nodes (SLN) in patients with melanoma, and to compare each dye to the others.
|
|||
Change History | ||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | |||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | |||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Descriptive Information | ||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Infrared Lymphangiography as a Method of Sentinel Node Identification | |||
Official Title ICMJE | Infrared Lymphangiography as a Method of Sentinel Node Identification | |||
Brief Summary | The initial treatment for most people with melanoma involves wide excision of the skin and sentinel node biopsy. As with other cancers, the status of the sentinel node provides important prognostic information to the patient and physician. Sentinel node biopsy was first developed using only a blue dye. Technetium99, a radioactive protein, was added later and provides the ability to image the patient and identify relevant lymph node basins. For the last 15 years or so, the standard method of SLN localization includes both tech99 and blue dye. While the rates of localization overall are excellent, these methods each have drawbacks. We are investigating a new method of finding sentinel nodes that uses a green dye that has an infrared signal. Our hypothesis is that indocyanine green (ICG) and real time lymphangiography is equivalent to technetium99 and methylene blue in identifying sentinel nodes (SLN) in patients with melanoma. | |||
Detailed Description | Patients with melanoma of the trunk or extremities were prospectively enrolled in this trial. Patients with head and neck melanoma were excluded from this study based on our pilot experience. ICG is poorly visualized through muscle, and there seems to be high background uptake in the parotid gland; both of these features limit the utility of ICG and fluorescence imaging. All subjects had T1b or greater melanoma, and met current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for sentinel node biopsy. All subjects had injection of tech99 and lymphangiography prior to surgery, and injection of indocyanine green (ICG) and methylene blue dye (MB) in the operating room. We utilized methylene blue dye for all subjects due to poor availability of isosulfan blue for a period of time, and to maintain consistency in the trial. Up to 1ml of MB was injected, and 0.9ml ICG (2.5 mg/ml). The ICG and MB were injected into the dermis separately, after induction of anesthesia and prior to prepping the patient. Each lymph node basin was examined with the gamma probe and imaged with the SPY Elite (Novadaq) prior to making skin incision, with assessment of the visibility of ICG through the skin (yes or no). Once incision was made, the basin was periodically imaged with SPY, or dissection was carried out with real time lymphangiography until the sentinel node was identified. The camera of the SPY machine is positioned over the basin, with the image projected onto a monitor. Similar to laparoscopy, the surgeon can watch the image and operate at the same time. Each sentinel node was assessed for the presence of each dye. A lymph node with any one of the dyes present was considered a sentinel node, and was resected. Fluorescence and blue dye were measured as yes or no, and not quantitated. Additional data collected includes demographic data, the dose of ICG and MB given, adverse effects from any dye, the total number of sentinel nodes identified and the number of malignant sentinel nodes. Pair-wise comparisons were made between the three dyes regarding the number of detected sentinel nodes, and the number of detected metastatic nodes. |
|||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | |||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | |||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: N/A Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
|||
Condition ICMJE |
|
|||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
|||
Study Arms ICMJE | Experimental: Indocyanine Green
Single arm study, each subject receives 0.9ml ICG, methylene blue and technetium 99.
Interventions:
|
|||
Publications * | Jain V, Phillips BT, Conkling N, Pameijer C. Sentinel lymph node detection using laser-assisted indocyanine green dye lymphangiography in patients with melanoma. Int J Surg Oncol. 2013;2013:904214. doi: 10.1155/2013/904214. Epub 2013 Dec 8. | |||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
||||
Recruitment Information | ||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | |||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
89 | |||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | |||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | February 2016 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | January 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
|||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
|||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | |||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | |||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | |||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | United States | |||
Removed Location Countries | ||||
Administrative Information | ||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT02057393 | |||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 247374 | |||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | |||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | |||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
|||
Responsible Party | Colette Pameijer, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center | |||
Study Sponsor ICMJE | Milton S. Hershey Medical Center | |||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | |||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
|||
PRS Account | Milton S. Hershey Medical Center | |||
Verification Date | June 2017 | |||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |