Effect of Interscalene Block on Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Shoulder Surgery Patients
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02034370 |
Recruitment Status :
Withdrawn
(Inclusion criteria not met at preoperative clinic visit screening. No eligible participants.)
First Posted : January 13, 2014
Last Update Posted : November 30, 2016
|
Tracking Information | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date | January 8, 2014 | |||
First Posted Date | January 13, 2014 | |||
Last Update Posted Date | November 30, 2016 | |||
Study Start Date | March 2014 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | August 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Current Primary Outcome Measures |
Incidence of postoperative sleep disordered breathing [ Time Frame: The night after surgery ] The incidence of postoperative sleep disordered breathing (apnea-hypopnea index) defined as ≥5 episodes per hour of >50% reduction of expiratory air flow associated with a ≥4% reduction in oxygen saturation (referred to as ODI4 or oxygen desaturation index > or = to 4 points drop in SpO2) that lasts for at least 10 seconds each as measured by the pulse oximeter.
|
|||
Original Primary Outcome Measures | Same as current | |||
Change History | ||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures |
Changes in lung function [ Time Frame: Once in Pre-op the day of surgery, and once in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit the day of surgery once the patient is sufficiently recovered from their procedure but before going home (all within 24 hours) ] As measured by spirometry test administered preoperatively and postoperatively
|
|||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures | Same as current | |||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures |
|
|||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Same as current | |||
Descriptive Information | ||||
Brief Title | Effect of Interscalene Block on Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Shoulder Surgery Patients | |||
Official Title | Influence of Inter-scalene Blockade on Postoperative Episodic Desaturation in Patients at High Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) | |||
Brief Summary | Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is when a person stops breathing repeatedly during sleep. Breathing stops because the airway collapses and prevents air from getting into the lungs.This airway closure results in a decrease in the amount of oxygen that is in the blood. Anesthetics given during surgery are known to increase the tendency for a patient's airway to close immediately after surgery in the recovery room and to reduce the amount of oxygen in a patient's blood immediately after surgery. These two factors combined could have a profound effect on a patient's well being after surgery. Recent advances in general anesthesia, pain medications, and surgical techniques have made outpatient surgery more common. Due to the increase in outpatient surgeries, pain management techniques that will work efficiently and for longer periods of time are necessary. One of these techniques is a nerve block, which coats the nerve with a numbing medication and blocks all pain from that area. Nerve blocks are routinely used along with general anesthesia for outpatient surgeries and help reduce or eliminate the need for IV or oral pain medicine after the surgery. Nerve blocks can provide good pain relief with early recovery and fewer side effects (nausea, vomiting, etc.) related to narcotic pain medicines. Unfortunately, there are no studies that look at the effect of anesthesia and nerve blocks on breathing patterns and oxygen saturation levels after discharge from outpatient surgery. We therefore propose to study the changes in lung function tests and blood oxygen levels after a nerve block and general anesthesia for outpatient shoulder surgery. We would like to conduct a home sleep study including measuring oxygen levels while subjects are sleeping, before, during and after surgery, and test lung function both before and after surgery to see if there are any differences. We will recruit 10 subjects with eligibility based on clinically indicated shoulder surgery and a nerve block. The study will be non-interventional during surgery. It is possible that future screening for out-patient shoulder surgery includes preoperative overnight oxygen saturation measurement to identify patients at high-risk of changes in oxygen levels. These patients may benefit from hospital admission after surgery for close observation. Thus, this study could have significant implications for patient safety and resource utilization. |
|||
Detailed Description | History & Significance: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a syndrome of sleep related airway obstruction (snoring) and reduction in blood oxygen levels affecting between 2% and 24% of the general population1. In other words, a person stops breathing repeatedly during sleep when they have OSA. Breathing stops because the airway collapses and prevents air from getting into the lungs. The impact of OSA on systemic heart and lung disease is slow and progressive over a course of years. Exposure to anesthesia increases the tendency for postoperative airway obstruction and reduction in oxygen levels2, both of which could have significant impact on patient well-being. Recent advances in general anesthetics, opioid analgesic drugs and surgical techniques have made outpatient surgery common for a significant proportion of patients. It is estimated that approximately 50% of procedures currently performed in the University of Michigan Health System are day-case procedures, the vast majority of which require deep sedation or general anesthesia. The reduction in postoperative hospital based care has placed considerable emphasis on the efficient delivery of pain relief and has resulted in an increased usage of peripheral nerve blocks to reduce the need for intravenous sedative opioid analgesics and deep levels of anesthesia. Shoulder surgery is a particularly good example where a nerve block in the neck region (typically an inter-scalene brachial plexus block) placed before anesthesia provides good pain relief with early recovery and less side effects directly related to opioid analgesics. Nevertheless, one of the side effects of the interscalene nerve block is temporary (12-18 hours) weakness of the diaphragm muscle on the same side as the block, due to phrenic nerve blockade. As a result, there is a change in the patient's breathing pattern which is typically compensated by increased work by other muscles in the respiratory system3. However, it is important to note that shoulder joint disease is more common in middle-aged patients who are typically at greater risk of OSA. The baseline abnormalities in respiration in OSA patients put them at increased risk of breathing abnormalities after the inter-scalene nerve block. As a result, this surgery presents unique challenges to the anesthesiologist looking to balance the benefit and risks of inter-scalene nerve blocks. Unfortunately, there are no studies that look at the effect of anesthesia and inter-scalene blocks on breathing patterns and oxygen saturation levels after discharge from outpatient surgery, as measured by spirometry, sleep studies and pulse oximetry. We therefore propose to study the changes in lung function tests and blood oxygen levels after an inter-scalene block and general anesthesia for outpatient shoulder surgery. It is possible that future screening for out-patient shoulder surgery includes preoperative overnight oxygen saturation measurement to identify patients at high-risk of changes in oxygen levels. These patients may benefit from hospital admission after surgery for close observation. Thus, this study could have significant implications for patient safety and resource utilization. Sample Size Estimation: We hypothesize that all patients undergoing inter-scalene block and general anesthesia for shoulder surgery will develop a doubling of significant oximetric changes based on standard measures used in sleep studies. At least 8 patients are required for a study with 5% type-I and 20% type-II error to prove this hypothesis. We plan to recruit 10 patients for the study, with each patient doubling as their own control, to allow for a 20% (2 subjects) withdrawal rate. We anticipate having 50 screen failures. Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure for this study is the incidence of postoperative sleep disordered breathing (apnea-hypopnea index) defined as ≥5 episodes per hour of >50% reduction of expiratory air flow associated with a ≥4% reduction in oxygen saturation (referred to as ODI4 or oxygen desaturation index > or = to 4 points drop in SpO2) that lasts for at least 10 seconds each as measured by the pulse oximeter. Secondary outcome measures include changes in lung function tests and lowest and mean oxygen saturation levels during sleep. Study Design: This is an observational longitudinal study, wherein each patient acts as their own control. 10 patients with high risk prediction factors of OSA, as screened by the Perioperative- Sleep Apnea Prediction Score(P-SAP) of ≥6, presenting for outpatient shoulder surgery, will be approached for participation in this study.The P-SAP score consists of three demographic variables (age> 43 years, male gender and obesity), three medical history variables (history of snoring, type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension) and three airway measures (thick neck, modified Mallampati class of 3 or 4 and reduced thyromental distance) and the number of significant variables present in a given patient is the P-SAP score. The respiratory effects of the anesthetic and block will be assessed by using pulse oximetry, spirometry, and overnight sleep studies. Preoperative and postoperative values will be compared for significant differences. Standard monitoring will be employed during anesthesia including continuous electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure measurement every 3 minutes, continuous pulse oximetry, continuous capnography, continuous respiratory gas measurements, neuromuscular function monitoring and continuous body temperature. Anesthesia technique will include the preoperative interscalene block, followed by induction of anesthesia with midazolam, fentanyl, propofol and muscle relaxation with succinylcholine and/or vecuronium as indicated. This will be followed by tracheal intubation to protect the airway and ensure conduit for adequate intraoperative controlled ventilation. Anesthesia will be maintained with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), oxygen and air, titrated to ensure adequate depth of anesthesia. Additional analgesia will be provided with bolus or continuous infusion remifentanil as needed. Institutional protocols for prevention of nausea and vomiting will be employed. At the end of the surgical procedure, full recovery of neuromuscular function will be facilitated by use of neostigmine and glycopyrrolate, before removal of the endotracheal tube. On arrival to the post anesthesia care unit, the patient will be monitored and managed to ensure safe and comfortable recovery from the surgical procedure. Additional fentanyl will be used for pain relief if needed and standard postoperative protocols for management of care will be followed. Discharge from the PACU will be done on full recovery to satisfy institutional PACU discharge criteria. Prior to discharge from PACU a second set of pulmonary function tests will be performed by the research assistant. Patients will be discharged home on standard postoperative analgesia including acetaminophen and hydrocodone or at surgical resident's discretion. Study Design Rationale The American Society of Anesthesiologists' practice guideline on obstructive sleep apnea (Anesthesiology 2006) clearly supports the use of regional anesthesia and analgesia as a way to reduce perioperative opioid usage. The technique described in our proposal is essentially a "single intervention" as the anesthetic always includes a general anesthesia. As this is the standard of care, we would not be able to employ a randomized control design that denies this "better care" randomly to some patients. A non-random selection of cases to study the effects of general anesthesia vs. block would be difficult because in the absence of the block, the patients get higher doses of opioids and general anesthetics. This makes it impossible to compare perioperative sleep disturbances with patients who get the additional inter-scalene block (as both opioids and general anesthetic agents directly impact the severity of sleep related breathing disturbances) Also, since these patients have medical or personal reasons to avoid the block, this would negatively impact our likelihood of recruiting comparable study populations We will use a longitudinal study design and pre-block and postoperative spirometry, as a way to account for inter-individual differences in the effects of scalene block on lung volumes. At lower lung volumes, patients are more likely to develop airway obstruction. As a first step, we would like to test the influence of this lung volume change on the outcomes, rather than identify which part of the anesthetic is causing the lung volume change. We therefore, will not include a control group. Research Procedures:
|
|||
Study Type | Observational [Patient Registry] | |||
Study Design | Observational Model: Case-Control Time Perspective: Prospective |
|||
Target Follow-Up Duration | 1 Week | |||
Biospecimen | Not Provided | |||
Sampling Method | Non-Probability Sample | |||
Study Population | Our study population consists of patients who are receiving an interscalene nerve block as an anesthetic for their scheduled shoulder surgery, and are at risk for OSA. | |||
Condition | Obstructive Sleep Apnea | |||
Intervention |
|
|||
Study Groups/Cohorts | Included patients
All ten patients included in this cohort. Shoulder surgery patients that are getting a nerve block and are at high risk for OSA. They will receive a Lung-function spirometry test and an overnight sleep test.
Interventions:
|
|||
Publications * |
|
|||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
||||
Recruitment Information | ||||
Recruitment Status | Withdrawn | |||
Actual Enrollment |
0 | |||
Original Estimated Enrollment |
10 | |||
Actual Study Completion Date | August 2015 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | August 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Eligibility Criteria | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
|||
Sex/Gender |
|
|||
Ages | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | |||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers | Yes | |||
Contacts | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | |||
Listed Location Countries | United States | |||
Removed Location Countries | ||||
Administrative Information | ||||
NCT Number | NCT02034370 | |||
Other Study ID Numbers | 36398 | |||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | |||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | |||
IPD Sharing Statement | Not Provided | |||
Responsible Party | Satya Krishna Ramachandran, University of Michigan | |||
Study Sponsor | University of Michigan | |||
Collaborators | Not Provided | |||
Investigators |
|
|||
PRS Account | University of Michigan | |||
Verification Date | November 2016 |