Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Use of Predictive Modeling to Improve Operating Room Scheduling Efficiency

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01892865
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 8, 2013
Results First Posted : January 2, 2018
Last Update Posted : January 2, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
VA Office of Research and Development

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE July 1, 2013
First Posted Date  ICMJE July 8, 2013
Results First Submitted Date  ICMJE January 30, 2017
Results First Posted Date  ICMJE January 2, 2018
Last Update Posted Date January 2, 2018
Study Start Date  ICMJE August 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date December 2015   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 24, 2017)
Difference Between the Actual and Predicted Length of Operative Day (in Minutes) [ Time Frame: Three years ]
The scheduling imprecision between the two scheduling approaches will be compared. Scheduling imprecision is defined as the difference between the actual and predicted length of operative day.
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: July 1, 2013)
Improvement in scheduling imprecision [ Time Frame: Three years ]
The scheduling imprecision between the two scheduling approaches will be compared. Scheduling imprecision is defined as the difference between the actual and predicted length of operative day.
Change History Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01892865 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 24, 2017)
  • Difference in Throughput [ Time Frame: Three years ]
    Difference in total number of cases scheduled per unit of time analyzed between the two study arms
  • Operative Suite Personnel Job Satisfaction [ Time Frame: Three years ]
    Comparison of job satisfaction between study arms using three domains of the Maslach Burnout Inventory: Depersonalization (range 0-17, score of 17 indicates worse depersonalization). Emotional Exhaustion (range: 0-36, score of 36 is the worse). Personal accomplishment (range 1-60, score of 60 is best).
  • Complications: A Composite Endpoint of Death, Myocardial Infarction, Bleeding, Amputation [ Time Frame: Three years ]
    Comparison of the perioperative (30-day postoperative) composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, bleeding, amputation between the two study groups
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: July 1, 2013)
  • Difference in Throughput [ Time Frame: Three years ]
    Difference in total number of cases performed between the two study arms
  • Operative Suite Personnel Job Satisfaction [ Time Frame: Three years ]
    Comparison of job satisfaction between study arms
  • Complications: A Composite Endpoint of Death, Myocardial Infarction, Bleeding, Amputation [ Time Frame: Three years ]
    Comparison of the perioperative (30-day postoperative) composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, bleeding, amputation between the two study groups
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE Use of Predictive Modeling to Improve Operating Room Scheduling Efficiency
Official Title  ICMJE Use of Predictive Modeling to Improve Operating Room Scheduling Efficiency
Brief Summary This study compares two different methodologies of scheduling cases in the operating room.
Detailed Description The goal of the proposed study is to address the efficacy of a scheduling methodology that uses a regression-based predictive modeling system (PMS) to calculate operative and anesthetic time length. The investigators hypothesize that compared to the traditional scheduling system (TSS) that calculate operative length using historic means, case allocation in an operating room using the PMS will improve scheduling precision, increase operative volume and increase Operative Suite (OS) personnel satisfaction, without having adverse impact on patient outcomes. The investigators will evaluate this hypothesis using a randomized block design in two operating rooms of a single surgical specialty for a total of 100 operative days per arm.
Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Not Applicable
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Condition  ICMJE Operating Room Scheduling
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Other: Scheduling using historical means
    Scheduling will be performed taking into account historical means only for anesthetic, operative, and turn around time
  • Other: Scheduling using regression modeling system
    A regression model that uses predictor of operative length will be used to predict operative, anesthetic, and turn around time length
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Active Comparator: Historical means method
    Operative time will be predicted using historical service means. Schedule will be constructed using this time
    Intervention: Other: Scheduling using historical means
  • Experimental: Predictive Modeling System (PMS)
    Operative time will be predicted using a regression model. Schedule will be constructed using this time
    Intervention: Other: Scheduling using regression modeling system
Publications * Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Completed
Actual Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 24, 2017)
735
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: July 1, 2013)
1500
Actual Study Completion Date  ICMJE July 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date December 2015   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The only requirement for including a day in the study will be that all the procedures performed in that specific day have been previously performed in our hospital at least 5 times a year for each of the last three years. This rule will encompass the vast majority of the performed vascular procedures in our facility. Setting the threshold at a minimum of 5 cases per year is essential to assure that some data will be available to calculate the expected length of the case with either the traditional or the predictive modeling system. If a case is performed in a day when the scheduling imprecision is supposed to be calculated using the PMS but modeling data do not exist, then the anticipated length of this case will be calculated using the historic means.
  • Surgery cancellation after the first case will not disqualify that day from inclusion in the study. If the cancellation occurs in the last case of the sequence for the specific day then no particular intervention will be taken. The anticipated end of the surgical day will reset to the end of the last case that took place, and all the imprecision calculations will be performed as described below. If the cancellation occurs in one of the intermediate cases, then the end of the operative day will reset to reflect the removal of the cancelled case.

Exclusion Criteria:

A day will be excluded from the study when any of the following occur (based on historical data the investigators anticipate 10-15% of the operative days to meet the exclusion criteria):

  • Only one or no cases have been scheduled for the entire operative day
  • An emergency case is added as first case, or in between the scheduled cases.
  • The operative day falls during a major holiday week (Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year). The schedule during these time periods tends to be fragmented, cancellation rates are high, and cases are frequently performed with back-up teams only. All these factors may distort the findings.
  • There is an unusual case in the schedule that does not meet the minimum requirement of 5 previous operations on a yearly basis for the last three years.
  • The first case of the day is cancelled
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE Child, Adult, Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE United States
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT01892865
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE IIR 12-113
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product Not Provided
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE
Plan to Share IPD: No
Responsible Party VA Office of Research and Development
Study Sponsor  ICMJE VA Office of Research and Development
Collaborators  ICMJE Not Provided
Investigators  ICMJE
Principal Investigator: Panagiotis Kougias, MD MSc Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
Principal Investigator: David H. Berger, MD Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
PRS Account VA Office of Research and Development
Verification Date May 2017

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP