End Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring for Evaluating Changes of PaCO2 After Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in COPD
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01821365 |
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified April 2013 by ting Jiang, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : April 1, 2013
Last Update Posted : April 5, 2013
|
Tracking Information | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date | March 27, 2013 | |||
First Posted Date | April 1, 2013 | |||
Last Update Posted Date | April 5, 2013 | |||
Study Start Date | March 2013 | |||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | July 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Current Primary Outcome Measures |
the agreement and correlation between the partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide(PETCO2) [ Time Frame: one day ] PETCO2 was measured by using sidestream capnometer though prolonged expiratory method(extend to 5s) , and obtained arterial blood sampling simultaneously.
|
|||
Original Primary Outcome Measures | Same as current | |||
Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01821365 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | |||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Descriptive Information | ||||
Brief Title | End Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring for Evaluating Changes of PaCO2 After Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in COPD | |||
Official Title | End Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring for Evaluating Changes of Arterial Carbon Dioxide After Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | |||
Brief Summary | Sidestream end-tidal CO2 has been found to be closely correlated to PaCO2 especially when people have the stable hemodynamics and normal lung function. PETCO2 can basically reflect the level of PaCO2,but some investigators found that PETCO2 measurements did not reflect PaCO2 in COPD patients.There may be several reasons for this discrepancy. Due to airway obstruction and ventilation-perfusion mismatch, there is a delay in the maximum alveolar concentration of CO2 reaching the cannula, which may give lower PETCO2 values compared with PaCO2. To overcome this disadvantage, we tried to prolong their expiratory time (extend to 5-8s) in order to guarantee adequate time for alveolar CO2 reaching the cannula.our study mainly focus on two issues.First, to explore the optimal depth of tube placed when patients with COPD breathe spontaneously or receive noninvasive ventilation, and compare the differences of two condition at the same time. Secondly, to evaluate the agreement between the PaCO2 and sidestream PETCO2(5s)values in COPD patients receiving noninvasive ventilation when our extension tube locates in the optimal position, and investigate whether PETCO2(5s)can be used to monitor ventilation status dynamically. | |||
Detailed Description | Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation(NPPV) can significantly improve gas exchange and relieve respiratory muscle fatigue for COPD,and arterial blood gas is the gold standard to evaluate ventilation status,but the procedure is time consuming,invasive, painful and in some patients. Sidestream end-tidal CO2 has been found to be closely correlated to PaCO2 especially when people have the stable hemodynamics and normal lung function. PETCO2 can basically reflect the level of PaCO2, but for patients with COPD, due to the presence of airway obstruction and emphysema formation, which cause ventilation-perfusion ratio(V/Q) , result to dead space-tidal volume ratio(VD/VT) and right-to-left shunting(Qs/Qt), the time of various lung units discharge of carbon dioxide is not synchronous. Some investigators found that PETCO2 measurements did not reflect PaCO2 in COPD patients. There may be several reasons for this discrepancy. Due to airway obstruction and ventilation-perfusion mismatch, there is a delay in the maximum alveolar concentration of CO2 reaching the cannula, which may give lower PETCO2 values compared with PaCO2. To overcome this disadvantage, we tried to prolong their expiratory time (extend to 5-8s) in order to guarantee adequate time for alveolar CO2 reaching the cannula. our study mainly focus on two issues.First, to explore the optimal depth of tube placed when patients with COPD breathe spontaneously or receive noninvasive ventilation, and compare the differences of two condition at the same time. Secondly, to evaluate the agreement between the PaCO2 and sidestream PETCO2(5s)values in COPD patients receiving noninvasive ventilation when our extension tube locates in the optimal position, and investigate whether PETCO2(5s)can be used to monitor ventilation status dynamically. |
|||
Study Type | Observational [Patient Registry] | |||
Study Design | Time Perspective: Prospective | |||
Target Follow-Up Duration | 2 Days | |||
Biospecimen | Not Provided | |||
Sampling Method | Non-Probability Sample | |||
Study Population | Patients with a COPD exacerbation who admitted to the respiratory department of First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou,Guangdong,China | |||
Condition | COPD | |||
Intervention | Not Provided | |||
Study Groups/Cohorts | Not Provided | |||
Publications * |
|
|||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
||||
Recruitment Information | ||||
Recruitment Status | Unknown status | |||
Estimated Enrollment |
40 | |||
Original Estimated Enrollment | Same as current | |||
Estimated Study Completion Date | July 2013 | |||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | July 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Eligibility Criteria | Inclusion Criteria:1.patients are enrolled in accordance with 2011 international treatment guidelines of COPD. 2.patients are in a clear state of mind and can incompliance with clinicians to extend breathing only using nose and closing mouth. Exclusion Criteria:1.Hemodynamic instability. 2.Pulmonary embolism,Pneumothorax, pleural effusion, upper airway obstruction,Chest trauma, chest wall deformities, neuromuscular diseases, lung tumor. 3.combinating acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma in this hospitalization. 4.Nose and mouth trauma, deformity, or recent surgery. |
|||
Sex/Gender |
|
|||
Ages | 40 Years to 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult) | |||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | |||
Contacts | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | |||
Listed Location Countries | China | |||
Removed Location Countries | ||||
Administrative Information | ||||
NCT Number | NCT01821365 | |||
Other Study ID Numbers | 2009CB522100 | |||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | |||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | |||
IPD Sharing Statement | Not Provided | |||
Responsible Party | ting Jiang, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University | |||
Study Sponsor | The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University | |||
Collaborators | Not Provided | |||
Investigators |
|
|||
PRS Account | The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University | |||
Verification Date | April 2013 |