Right to Left Cardiac Shunt Detection (PFO Detection)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01773252 |
Recruitment Status :
Terminated
(Business decision to perform a market withdrawal of the product)
First Posted : January 23, 2013
Last Update Posted : November 13, 2015
|
Tracking Information | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | January 8, 2013 | |||
First Posted Date ICMJE | January 23, 2013 | |||
Last Update Posted Date | November 13, 2015 | |||
Study Start Date ICMJE | November 2012 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | October 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
|||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | |||
Change History | ||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Presence or absence of shunt [ Time Frame: Three days ] To establish the positive percent agreement and the negative percent agreement of Cardiox FDS procedure with a transcranial Doppler (TCD) from select study sites.
|
|||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Presence or absence of shunt [ Time Frame: Three days ] To establish the positive percent agreement and the negative percent agreement of Cardiox FDS procedure with transcranial Doppler (TCD).
|
|||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Descriptive Information | ||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Right to Left Cardiac Shunt Detection | |||
Official Title ICMJE | A With-in Subject, Controlled Study to Determine the Sensitivity and Specificity of the Cardiox Flow Detection System for the Detection of Right-to-Left Cardiac Shunts Compared to Transesophageal Echocardiography and Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound | |||
Brief Summary | The purpose of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Cardiox Flow Detection System (FDS) in identifying an intracardiac right-to-left shunt (RLS) compared to the results of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). RLS intracardiac shunts are associated with a number of clinically important syndromes including paradoxical thromboembolism (causing stroke or other systemic infarct), migraine headaches (particularly with aura), desaturation with obstructive sleep apnea, and decompression illness. From a research perspective, the detection of shunts in subjects with these types of syndromes is critical in helping to define the role of RLS in these disease processes. From a clinical perspective, shunt detection will be increasingly important in an era where interventional procedures for repairing cardiac defects are available for subjects determined to be at risk. The currently accepted reference standard for detection of an intra-cardiac patent foramen ovale/atrial septal defect (PFO/ASD) RLS is a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), a procedure that is invasive, uncomfortable, and requires conscious sedation. Alternative options include transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with injection of agitated saline (with and without Valsalva strain), a procedure that is far less sensitive than TEE due to the echocardiography imaging limitations seen in many adults. Finally, transcranial Doppler (TCD) with injection of agitated saline (with and without Valsalva strain) is a newer entrant into this arena that does not require sedation or any invasive instrumentation. The Cardiox Model 100 FDS utilizes an optical sensor positioned on the surface of the subject's skin at the scaphoid fossa of the ear. Next, a predetermined dose of an indicator dye, indocyanine green (ICG), is injected at a predetermined rate into a peripheral antecubital vein of the subject while the subject performs a breathing maneuver called a Valsalva maneuver. The exhalation by the subject into a mouthpiece connected to a pressure transducer via a flexible tubing extension, or its equivalent (ie, performing the Valsalva maneuver), is an essential step for all existing RLS detection methods. The Valsalva maneuver by the subject creates a pressure differential between the right and left sides of the heart. This Valsalva maneuver results in blood flow from the right side of the heart to the left side of the heart through an ASD, and/or causes a PFO, if present, to open, also allowing blood to flow directly from the right side to the left side of the heart without passing through the lungs (pulmonary vasculature) for oxygenation. The Earpads, including their fluorescence sensor arrays (FSA), are used to measure the relative concentration (ie, fluorescence signal level) of ICG dye in the bloodstream as a function of time. If a premature inflection or peak occurs in the ICG dye concentration level at a time point prior to the rise and fall of the concentration associated with the main bolus of indicator, then a RLS is present in the heart. The amplitude of this premature ICG dye-dilution curve (referred to as "RLS-indicator dilution curve") is used to subsequently quantify the magnitude of the right-to-left shunt by ratiometrically comparing the amplitude of this RLS indicator dilution curve to the amplitude of the main indicator dilution curve associated with that portion of the injected ICG dye that follows the normal pathway from the right side of the heart, through the lungs, and into the left side of the heart (referred to as "normal indicator dilution curve"). |
|||
Detailed Description | Not Provided | |||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | |||
Study Phase ICMJE | Phase 3 | |||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: N/A Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
|||
Condition ICMJE |
|
|||
Intervention ICMJE | Device: Flow Detection System
Other Name: Model 100
|
|||
Study Arms ICMJE | Experimental: TEE
Within patient comparison of TEE, FDS and a TCD from select study sites
Intervention: Device: Flow Detection System
|
|||
Publications * | Not Provided | |||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
||||
Recruitment Information | ||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Terminated | |||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
141 | |||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
150 | |||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | November 2015 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | October 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
|||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
|||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | |||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | |||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | |||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | United States | |||
Removed Location Countries | ||||
Administrative Information | ||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01773252 | |||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | FDS-0005 | |||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | |||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | |||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE | Not Provided | |||
Responsible Party | Cardiox Corporation | |||
Study Sponsor ICMJE | Cardiox Corporation | |||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | |||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
|||
PRS Account | Cardiox Corporation | |||
Verification Date | November 2015 | |||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |