The Impact of Post-tetanic Count on Subsequent Train-of-four During Recovery From Rocuronium
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01086176 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : March 12, 2010
Last Update Posted : April 27, 2010
|
Sponsor:
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
Information provided by:
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
Tracking Information | |||
---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date | March 10, 2010 | ||
First Posted Date | March 12, 2010 | ||
Last Update Posted Date | April 27, 2010 | ||
Study Start Date | March 2010 | ||
Actual Primary Completion Date | April 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||
Current Primary Outcome Measures |
The difference at 30 minutes after the post-tetanic count between the TOF% in both arms, we expect a difference of more than 10% | ||
Original Primary Outcome Measures | Same as current | ||
Change History | |||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures |
|
||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures | Same as current | ||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||
Descriptive Information | |||
Brief Title | The Impact of Post-tetanic Count on Subsequent Train-of-four During Recovery From Rocuronium | ||
Official Title | Not Provided | ||
Brief Summary | The purpose of this study is to see how long does the effect of a post-tetanic facilitation last on subsequent train-of-four. The investigators hypothesis is that the effect last at least 30 minutes. | ||
Detailed Description | Not Provided | ||
Study Type | Observational | ||
Study Design | Observational Model: Case-Control Time Perspective: Prospective |
||
Target Follow-Up Duration | Not Provided | ||
Biospecimen | Not Provided | ||
Sampling Method | Non-Probability Sample | ||
Study Population | Poeple having general anesthesia at HMR | ||
Condition | Post-tetanic Count on One Arm, the Other Arm is the Control | ||
Intervention | Device: NMT (a device that can do neurostimulation and can record the response on the stimulation by Datex)
on one side, we do a post-tetanic count, on the other side we don't, after, we do train-of-four on both sides and check the difference
|
||
Study Groups/Cohorts | Patient-control
Intervention: Device: NMT (a device that can do neurostimulation and can record the response on the stimulation by Datex)
|
||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||
Recruitment Information | |||
Recruitment Status | Completed | ||
Estimated Enrollment |
22 | ||
Original Estimated Enrollment | Same as current | ||
Actual Study Completion Date | April 2010 | ||
Actual Primary Completion Date | April 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||
Eligibility Criteria | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||
Sex/Gender |
|
||
Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult) | ||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||
Contacts | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||
Listed Location Countries | Canada | ||
Removed Location Countries | |||
Administrative Information | |||
NCT Number | NCT01086176 | ||
Other Study ID Numbers | MaisonneuveRH-09092 | ||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Not Provided | ||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | ||
IPD Sharing Statement | Not Provided | ||
Responsible Party | Louis-Philippe Fortier MD Msc, HMR | ||
Study Sponsor | Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital | ||
Collaborators | Not Provided | ||
Investigators | Not Provided | ||
PRS Account | Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital | ||
Verification Date | March 2010 |