Chemotherapy Followed by Infusion of DMF5 Cells to Treat Metastatic Melanoma
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00924001 |
Recruitment Status :
Terminated
(study was stopped due to low accrual)
First Posted : June 18, 2009
Results First Posted : June 7, 2012
Last Update Posted : October 25, 2012
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Tracking Information | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | June 17, 2009 | |||
First Posted Date ICMJE | June 18, 2009 | |||
Results First Submitted Date ICMJE | December 22, 2011 | |||
Results First Posted Date ICMJE | June 7, 2012 | |||
Last Update Posted Date | October 25, 2012 | |||
Study Start Date ICMJE | August 2007 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | October 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
|||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Clinical response according to RECIST criteria and toxicity. | |||
Change History | ||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Number of Participiants With In-vivo Survival of Infused Cells [ Time Frame: 44 days ] In-vivo survival of infused cells is determined by analysis of the sequence of the variable region of the T cell receptor or flow cytometry (FACS).
|
|||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Determine the rate of repopulation of young TIL cells and establish correlates that predict in vivo persistence and clinical response. | |||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Descriptive Information | ||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Chemotherapy Followed by Infusion of DMF5 Cells to Treat Metastatic Melanoma | |||
Official Title ICMJE | Phase I/II Study Using a Non-Myeloablative Lymphocyte Depleting Regimen of Chemotherapy Followed by Infusion of Allogeneic Tumor-Reactive Lymphocyte Cell Line DMF5 in Metastatic Melanoma | |||
Brief Summary | Background:
Objectives: -To determine whether preparatory chemotherapy followed by infusion of DMF5 cells is a safe and effective for shrinking melanoma tumors. Eligibility: -Patients with metastatic melanoma and tissue type HLA-A201 who are 18 years of age or older. Design:
|
|||
Detailed Description | Background: In previous trials in the Surgery Branch, a 51 percent objective response rate has been observed in heavily pre-treated patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing adoptive cell transfer therapy utilizing a non-myeloablative preparative regimen followed by administration of autologous tumor-reactive lymphocytes and subsequent treatment with high-dose aldesleukin. However, in patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing metastasectomy, recovery of adequate numbers of tumor specific T lymphocytes from surgical specimens is possible in approximately half of all patients, thus limiting the application of adoptive cell transfer therapy. Murine models performed in the Surgery Branch have demonstrated solid tumor regression in mice treated with allogeneic tumor specific T cells combined with a preinfusion lymphodepleting regimen. We have identified a tumor specific lymphocyte cell line (DMF5) used previously in an autologous adoptive cell transfer protocol that was associated with an objective clinical response in that patient. In subsequent preclinical testing of this lymphocyte population, we have demonstrated high specificity against HLA-A 0201 positive melanoma cell lines as well as the common shared melanocyte differentiation antigen MART-1:27-35. We have expanded this lymphocyte population to provide up to 30 individual allogeneic cell transfers to HLAA 0201 positive patients with metastatic melanoma. In this trial we want to test our hypothesis that objective tumor regression can be achieved with the DMF5 allogeneic T-cell product using a non-myeloablative regimen followed by cell transfer and high-dose aldesleukin. It should be emphasized that this protocol is designed to test whether highly melanoma reactive allogeneic lymphocytes can mediate cancer regression. The DMF5 cell line is a limited reagent only available for the treatment of up to 30 patients. However, if this treatment results in cancer regression, it will represent an important step in our development of an allogeneic T-cell receptor engineered universal effector cell line for the treatment of patients with cancer. Objectives: To evaluate the safety of the administration of the DMF5 allogeneic T-cell product in patients receiving the non- myeloablative conditioning regimen, and aldesleukin. To determine whether this allogeneic tumor-specific lymphocyte cell line, hereafter referred to as DMF5, infused in conjunction with the administration of high-dose aldesleukin may result in objective clinical tumor regression in eligible HLA-A 0201 positive patients with metastatic melanoma receiving a non-myeloablative lymphoid depleting preparative regimen. To determine the in vivo survival of the infused cells following the non-myeloablative regimen, via analysis of the sequence of the variable region of the T cell receptor or flow cytometry (FACS). Eligibility: Patients with metastatic melanoma who are greater than or equal to 18 years of age, HLA-A 0201 positive, do not have suitable autologous tumor reactive TIL cells available, and are able to tolerate high-dose aldesleukin. Design: Patients will receive a non-myeloablative lymphocyte depleting preparative regiment consisting of cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/day times 2 days intravenous (IV)) and fludarabine (25 mg/m2/day IV times 5 days). Patients will receive intravenous adoptive transfer of the tumor reactive lymphocyte cell line DMF5 (after its expansion in interleukin-2 and OKT3) followed by high-dose intravenous (IV) aldesleukin (720,000 IU/kg/dose every 8 hours for up to 15 doses). Patients will undergo complete evaluation of tumor with physical examination, CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis and clinical laboratory evaluation four to six weeks after treatment and then monthly for approximately 3 to 4 months or until off study criteria are met. The study will be conducted using a Phase I/II optimal design. The protocol will proceed in a phase 1 dose escalation design, with three cohorts. Should a single patient experience a dose limiting toxicity at a particular dose level, three more patients would be treated at that dose to confirm that no greater than 1/6 patients have a DLT prior to proceeding to the next higher level. If a level with 2 or more DLTs in 3-6 patients has been identified, three additional patients will be accrued at the next lowest dose, for a total of 6, in order to further characterize the safety of the maximum tolerated dose prior to starting the phase II portion. If a dose limiting toxicity occurs in the first cohort, that cohort will be expanded to 6 patients. If 2 DLTs are encountered in this cohort, the study will be terminated. Once the MTD has been determined, the study then would proceed to the phase II portion, and initially, 9 total patients will be administered the therapy at the maximum tolerated dose. The plan will utilize a Simon two-stage optimal phase II design. If 0 of the 9 patients experiences a clinical response, then no further patients will be enrolled but if 1 or more of the first 9 evaluable patients enrolled have a clinical response, then accrual will continue until a total of 30 evaluable patients have been enrolled. This design has the ability to distinguish a 5% response rate (p0=0.05) from a 25% response rate (p1=0.25), with 10% probability of falsely "accepting" the DMF5 cell therapy approach (alpha=0.10), and 10% probability of incorrectly discarding this strategy as if it were unacceptably poor (beta=0.10). This design also has 63% probability of stopping early (at 9 patients) if the true response rate is 5%. |
|||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | |||
Study Phase ICMJE | Phase 1 Phase 2 |
|||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: N/A Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
|||
Condition ICMJE |
|
|||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
|||
Study Arms ICMJE | Experimental: Metastatic Melanoma
Melanoma that has invaded deep into the skin, lymph nodes, or other parts of the body.
Interventions:
|
|||
Publications * |
|
|||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
||||
Recruitment Information | ||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Terminated | |||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
1 | |||
Original Enrollment ICMJE |
30 | |||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | October 2010 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | October 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | -INCLUSION CRITERIA:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
|
|||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
|||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | |||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | |||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | |||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | United States | |||
Removed Location Countries | ||||
Administrative Information | ||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00924001 | |||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 070210 07-C-0210 |
|||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | |||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | |||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE | Not Provided | |||
Current Responsible Party | Steven A. Rosenberg, M.D./National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health | |||
Original Responsible Party | Not Provided | |||
Current Study Sponsor ICMJE | National Cancer Institute (NCI) | |||
Original Study Sponsor ICMJE | Same as current | |||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | |||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
|||
PRS Account | National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) | |||
Verification Date | October 2012 | |||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |