Cast Versus Splint in Children With Acceptably Angulated Wrist Fractures
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00610220 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : February 7, 2008
Last Update Posted : October 9, 2017
|
Tracking Information | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | January 24, 2008 | |||
First Posted Date ICMJE | February 7, 2008 | |||
Last Update Posted Date | October 9, 2017 | |||
Study Start Date ICMJE | January 2007 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | July 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Modified performance Activities Scale for Kids (ASKp) score [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ] | |||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | |||
Change History | ||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
|||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
|||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Descriptive Information | ||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Cast Versus Splint in Children With Acceptably Angulated Wrist Fractures | |||
Official Title ICMJE | Cast Versus Splint in Children With Minimally Angulated Fractures of the Distal Radius: a Randomized Controlled Trial. | |||
Brief Summary | The study will compare the effectiveness of a prefabricated wrist splint with thermoplast reinforcements versus a short arm cast in skeletally immature children. The hypothesis is that the commercially available wrist splint is at least as effective as traditional casting with respect to recovery of physical function. |
|||
Detailed Description | Acceptability angulated wrist bone fractures in children carry an excellent long-term prognosis because of the unique capacity of skeletally immature bones to heal via remodeling. Their management varies widely and there is virtually no scientific evidence supporting one treatment modality over another. Importantly, the most common treatment modality of cast application for four to six weeks is associated with many inconveniences. There are commercially available wrist splints that offer a more convenient alternative. Wrist splints likely have comparable immobilization and symptom relief, while simultaneously allowing for easier bathing and less reliance on subspeciality care. Preliminary adult evidence suggests that, in a comparable adult fracture, splinting may offer a safe alternative to casting, with earlier resumption of the usual activities. However, this treatment modality needs to be compared to the traditional casting management in the pediatric population before it can be recommended for clinical practice. This study will be the first to challenge the current practice of routine casting and compare it to a commercially available wrist splint with respect to recovery of physical function in children with acceptably angulated wrist fractures. In addition, standardized treatment of these fractures with a splint may be associated with lower morbidity, reduced use of health care resources, and have the potential for cost savings. This study will compare, in skeletally immature children, the functional outcomes that result from treatment with a prefabricated wrist splint versus a short arm cast in acceptably angulated distal radius fractures. Secondly, the cost-effectiveness of the splint relative to the cast will be evaluated. |
|||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | |||
Study Phase ICMJE | Phase 4 | |||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
|||
Condition ICMJE | Distal Radius Fractures | |||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
|||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
|||
Publications * | Boutis K, Willan A, Babyn P, Goeree R, Howard A. Cast versus splint in children with minimally angulated fractures of the distal radius: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2010 Oct 5;182(14):1507-12. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100119. Epub 2010 Sep 7. | |||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
||||
Recruitment Information | ||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | |||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
96 | |||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
76 | |||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | October 2009 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | July 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Therefore, all skeletally immature children ≥ 5 years and with a bone age of ≤ 11 years who present to the ED of HSC with acute distal metaphyseal radius +/- ulnar fractures that meet criteria for acceptable angulation and displacement will be eligible for enrollment. Exclusion Criteria:
|
|||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
|||
Ages ICMJE | 5 Years to 12 Years (Child) | |||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | |||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | |||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Canada | |||
Removed Location Countries | ||||
Administrative Information | ||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00610220 | |||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 1000010377 | |||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | |||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | |||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE | Not Provided | |||
Current Responsible Party | Kathy Boutis, The Hospital for Sick Children | |||
Original Responsible Party | Kathy Boutis/Principal Investigator, The Hospital for Sick Children | |||
Current Study Sponsor ICMJE | The Hospital for Sick Children | |||
Original Study Sponsor ICMJE | Same as current | |||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | |||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
|||
PRS Account | The Hospital for Sick Children | |||
Verification Date | May 2014 | |||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |