Evaluating Sexual Function in Women Undergoing a Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05399004 |
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : June 1, 2022
Last Update Posted : March 21, 2023
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Bladder Carcinoma | Other: Survey Administration |
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To characterize pre-operative sexual function and interest in sexual activity of women undergoing radical cystectomy.
II. To identify patient understanding and expectations as they relate to sexual dysfunction after radical cystectomy.
III. To describe pre-operative importance in sexual function recovery after radical cystectomy.
IV. Quantify the changes in sexual function within the year following radical cystectomy in women.
V. Explore the effects of age, baseline sexual function, general quality of life, parity, menopausal status, hormone replacement therapy (topical versus [vs.] oral), general and cancer related quality of life, chemotherapy (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant), treatment-related complications and performance status on sexual function outcomes.
VI. Explore the effects of robotic vs. open approach, extracorporeal vs. intracorporal approach, organ-sparing (ovaries, uterus, cervix, anterior vaginal wall), type of vaginal closure (vertical vs. horizontal), nerve sparing, urinary diversion type (ileal conduit vs. neobladder vs. continent cutaneous diversion) on sexual function outcomes.
VII. Quantify the changes in sexual activity interest within the year following radical cystectomy.
OUTLINE:
Patients complete surveys over 15-20 minutes at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Study Type : | Observational |
Estimated Enrollment : | 180 participants |
Observational Model: | Cohort |
Time Perspective: | Prospective |
Official Title: | Sexual Function in Women After Radical Cystectomy |
Actual Study Start Date : | September 3, 2019 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | December 31, 2023 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | December 31, 2023 |

Group/Cohort | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Observational (survey)
Patients complete surveys over 15-20 minutes at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months.
|
Other: Survey Administration
Complete surveys |
- Preoperative sexual function [ Time Frame: Baseline ]Assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Brief Profile Sexual Function and Satisfaction version 2 (v2.0). Will utilize descriptive statistics to report preoperative sexual function. Frequencies and percentages will be reported for categorical variables and mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) for continuous variables.
- Interest in sexual activity [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Will descriptively summarize the within-patient changes using the PROMIS Brief Profile Sexual Function and Satisfaction v2.0. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Lubrication [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Will descriptively summarize the within-patient changes using the PROMIS Brief Profile Sexual Function and Satisfaction v2.0. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Vaginal discomfort [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Will descriptively summarize the within-patient changes using the PROMIS Brief Profile Sexual Function and Satisfaction v2.0. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Satisfaction with sex life [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Will descriptively summarize the within-patient changes using the PROMIS Brief Profile Sexual Function and Satisfaction v2.0. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Labial discomfort [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Will descriptively summarize the within-patient changes using the PROMIS Brief Profile Sexual Function and Satisfaction v2.0. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Clitoral discomfort [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Will descriptively summarize the within-patient changes using the PROMIS Brief Profile Sexual Function and Satisfaction v2.0. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Orgasm ability [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Will descriptively summarize the within-patient changes using the PROMIS Brief Profile Sexual Function and Satisfaction v2.0. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Orgasm pleasure [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Will descriptively summarize the within-patient changes using the PROMIS Brief Profile Sexual Function and Satisfaction v2.0. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Change in sexual function scores [ Time Frame: From baseline to 12 months ]Will use a linear mixed effects model of 12-month sexual function scores adjusting for baseline function to evaluate independent variables of interest related to the surgical procedure: age, robotic/open approach, pelvic organ sparing and diversion type. Variables of interest will be analyzed separately. In the analysis of robotic vs. open approach, the model will include terms for time (after surgery: 3, 6, and 12 months, using a discrete time formulation), approach (robotic=1, open=0), and approach by time interaction. Contrasts of the interaction and main effects will allow estimation of whether outcomes at 12 months differ by approach.
- Physical function [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Assessed using the PROMIS - 29 Profile v2.1. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Fatigue [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Assessed using the PROMIS - 29 Profile v2.1. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Pain interference [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Assessed using the PROMIS - 29 Profile v2.1. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Depressive symptoms [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Assessed using the PROMIS - 29 Profile v2.1. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Anxiety [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Assessed using the PROMIS - 29 Profile v2.1. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Ability to participate in social roles and activities [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Assessed using the PROMIS - 29 Profile v2.1. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Sleep disturbances [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months ]Assessed using the PROMIS - 29 Profile v2.1. Contrasts within the linear mixed effects model will compare changes in subdomain score between different time points.
- Preoperative expectations/importance of sexual function recovery [ Time Frame: Baseline ]Will use a linear mixed effects model of sexual function scores measured post-baseline through 12 months, adjusted for baseline sexual function score to evaluate if preoperative expectation/importance of sexual function recovery is associated with outcomes over time.

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | Female |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult women greater than 18 years of age
- A diagnosis of bladder cancer
- Planned to undergo a radical cystectomy
- Willing and able to complete survey questionnaires
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Non-English speaking
- Life expectancy less than 2 years

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05399004
United States, District of Columbia | |
Sibley Memorial Hospital | Recruiting |
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20016 | |
Contact: Armine K. Smith asmit165@jhmi.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Armine K. Smith | |
United States, Iowa | |
University of Iowa/Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center | Not yet recruiting |
Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242 | |
Contact: Vignesh T. Packiam 319-678-7104 Vignesh-packiam@uiowa.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Vignesh T. Packiam | |
United States, Louisiana | |
Louisiana State University | Recruiting |
Lafayette, Louisiana, United States, 70503 | |
Contact: Mary E. Westerman mweste@lsuhsc.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Mary E. Westerman | |
United States, Maryland | |
Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center | Recruiting |
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287 | |
Contact: Max Kates Mkates@jhmi.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Max Kates | |
United States, Massachusetts | |
Brigham and Women's Hospital | Recruiting |
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115 | |
Contact: Mark A. Preston mpreston@bwh.harvard.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Mark A. Preston | |
United States, Michigan | |
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center | Recruiting |
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109 | |
Contact: Daniela Wittmann 800-865-1125 dwittman@umich.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Daniela Wittmann | |
United States, Minnesota | |
Mayo Clinic in Rochester | Recruiting |
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905 | |
Contact: Clinical Trials Referral Office 855-776-0015 mayocliniccancerstudies@mayo.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Stephen A. Boorjian, M.D. | |
United States, New York | |
Albany Medical Center | Recruiting |
Albany, New York, United States, 12208 | |
Contact: Svetlana Avulova 518-262-3341 avulovs@amc.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Svetlana Avulova | |
United States, North Carolina | |
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center | Recruiting |
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599 | |
Contact: Angela B. Smith angela_smith@med.unc.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Angela B. Smith | |
United States, Pennsylvania | |
University of Pennsylvania/Abramson Cancer Center | Recruiting |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104 | |
Contact: Trinity J. Bivalacqua Trinity.Bivalacqua@Pennmedicine.upenn.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Trinity J. Bivalacqua | |
United States, Tennessee | |
Vanderbilt University/Ingram Cancer Center | Recruiting |
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232 | |
Contact: Amy N. Luckenbaugh amy.n.luckenbaugh@vumc.org | |
Principal Investigator: Amy N. Luckenbaugh | |
United States, Texas | |
M D Anderson Cancer Center | Recruiting |
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030 | |
Contact: Neema Navai NNavai@mdanderson.org | |
Principal Investigator: Neema Navai | |
United States, Utah | |
Huntsman Cancer Institute/University of Utah | Recruiting |
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112 | |
Contact: Brock O'Neil brock.oneil@hci.utah.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Brock O'Neil | |
United States, Washington | |
University of Washington Medical Center - Montlake | Recruiting |
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195 | |
Contact: Sarah P. Psutka spsutka@uw.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Sarah P. Psutka |
Principal Investigator: | Stephen A Boorjian | Mayo Clinic in Rochester |
Responsible Party: | Stephen A. Boorjian, M.D., Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT05399004 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
19-007376 NCI-2021-13603 ( Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) ) |
First Posted: | June 1, 2022 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | March 21, 2023 |
Last Verified: | March 2023 |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms Urologic Neoplasms Urogenital Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Neoplasms Female Urogenital Diseases |
Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Urogenital Diseases Urinary Bladder Diseases Urologic Diseases Male Urogenital Diseases |