Active Body and Mind Intervention for Older Adults
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05233813 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : February 10, 2022
Last Update Posted : February 10, 2022
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Well Aging | Behavioral: Active Body and Mind | Not Applicable |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 59 participants |
Allocation: | Non-Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Supportive Care |
Official Title: | A Pilot Study of Testing the Multilevel Active Body and Mind (ABM) Intervention for Older Adults |
Actual Study Start Date : | September 13, 2019 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | December 6, 2019 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | December 6, 2019 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: ABM intervention group
The intervention group received three, 45-min group exercise lessons for 12 weeks. The group exercise lessons were taught by two experienced instructors.. Each participant in the intervention group received a Fitbit (Model InspireHR) activity tracker to self-monitor their daily PA, 5 days per week for 12 weeks.
|
Behavioral: Active Body and Mind
The intervention group attended three 45-min group exercise lessons per week and wore a Fitbit activity tracker during the weekdays for 12 weeks combined with weekly feedback and personalized activity goals. |
No Intervention: Comparison group
The comparison group continued their usual activities.
|
- Baseline Depression [ Time Frame: Baseline (the week before the intervention) ]Depression was measured using the 10-item Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Inventory on a 4-point Likert scale. The level of depressive symptoms was reflected by summing the responses of the ten items, with higher scores indicating greater levels of depressive symptoms.
- Baseline Happiness [ Time Frame: Baseline (the week before the intervention) ]Happiness was measured using the 4-item Subjective Happiness Scale on a 7-point Likert scale. The mean score of all items was calculated to indicate the level of happiness with higher scores indicating greater happiness.
- Baseline Life Satisfaction [ Time Frame: Baseline (the week before the intervention) ]Life satisfaction was measured using the 5-item Satisfaction With Life Scale on a 7-point Likert scale. The sum of all items provides a composite score, with higher scores representing higher levels of life satisfaction.
- Baseline Eudaimonic Well-Being [ Time Frame: Baseline (the week before the intervention) ]Eudaimonic well-being was assessed using the 18-item Psychological Well-Being Scale on a 7-point Likert scale. An overall score was computed by averaging the scores of all items. Higher scores indicate higher levels of eudaimonic well-being.
- Posttest Depression [ Time Frame: Post-intervention test (the week after the intervention) ]Depression was measured using the 10-item Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Inventory on a 4-point Likert scale. The level of depressive symptoms was reflected by summing the responses of the ten items, with higher scores indicating greater levels of depressive symptoms.
- Posttest Happiness [ Time Frame: Post-intervention test (the week after the intervention) ]Happiness was measured using the 4-item Subjective Happiness Scale on a 7-point Likert scale. The mean score of all items was calculated to indicate the level of happiness with higher scores indicating greater happiness.
- Posttest Life Satisfaction [ Time Frame: Post-intervention test (the week after the intervention) ]Life satisfaction was measured using the 5-item Satisfaction With Life Scale on a 7-point Likert scale. The sum of all items provides a composite score, with higher scores representing higher levels of life satisfaction.
- Posttest Eudaimonic Well-Being [ Time Frame: Post-intervention test (the week after the intervention) ]Eudaimonic well-being was assessed using the 18-item Psychological Well-Being Scale on a 7-point Likert scale. An overall score was computed by averaging the scores of all items. Higher scores indicate higher levels of eudaimonic well-being.

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 65 Years and older (Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- aged 65 or older,
- able to speak and read English fluently
- able to walk for 10 feet without human assistance
Exclusion Criteria:
- conditions preventing them from doing exercises

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05233813
United States, Michigan | |
University of Michigan | |
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109 |
Principal Investigator: | Weiyun Chen, Ph.D. | University of Michigan |
Responsible Party: | Weiyun Chen, Associate Professor, University of Michigan |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT05233813 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
HUM00158279 |
First Posted: | February 10, 2022 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | February 10, 2022 |
Last Verified: | February 2022 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |