We're building a better ClinicalTrials.gov. Check it out and tell us what you think!
Try the New Site
We're building a modernized ClinicalTrials.gov! Visit Beta.ClinicalTrials.gov to try the new functionality.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Preventing Youth Substance Use With Family Talk

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04400227
Recruitment Status : Withdrawn (Study closed due to change in funding.)
First Posted : May 22, 2020
Last Update Posted : July 13, 2022
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Boston Medical Center

Brief Summary:
Family Talk, an evidence-based parent-youth dyadic intervention, is a promising approach to improving substance use outcomes for high-risk families, and its structure lends itself to delivery by existing personnel within an Office-Based Addiction Treatment (OBAT) model of care. The investigators propose a single-arm pilot study with 25 parent-youth dyads through which a rapid cycle performance improvement approach will be employed to adapt and optimize the content and delivery of the embedded Family Talk prevention strategy. The investigators will field-test relevant baseline and outcome measures and will use qualitative methodology to identify key modifications to the intervention and generate hypotheses for how the prevention strategy may impact youth and family outcomes and prevent youth substance use. Information from this study will inform a subsequent pilot randomized controlled trial of the intervention to prevent substance use for youth whose parents are in recovery from SUD (substance use disorder).

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Substance Use Disorders Other: Family Talk Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 0 participants
Allocation: N/A
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Official Title: Pilot Study of Family Talk to Prevent Youth Substance Use
Estimated Study Start Date : July 2022
Estimated Primary Completion Date : June 2023
Estimated Study Completion Date : June 2023

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Family Issues

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Youth-Parent Dyads
Participants will receive the Family Talk intervention and followup.
Other: Family Talk

Family Talk is an evidence-based, parent-youth dyadic approach that uses psychoeducation and skills building to help families make meaning of a parent's adversity, increase resilience, and improve family functioning.

The Family Talk model comprises two components: the first involves a series of cognitive-behavioral techniques to bolster problem solving and communication skills among family members; the second involves a facilitated family meeting to develop a shared narrative for discussing each family member's experience of the parent's illness.





Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in youth substance use based on the Timeline Followback Interview [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 months ]
    The Timeline Followback Interview (TLFB) will be used to estimate substance use. It uses a calendar and asks the participant to indicate whether they used substances on each of the days listed for the last 3 months. No score is given for the measure. However, more days of use is associated with adverse health outcomes.

  2. Youth substance use based on the Timeline Followback Interview at 2 months [ Time Frame: 2 months ]
    The Timeline Followback Interview (TLFB) will be used to estimate substance use. It uses a calendar and asks the participant to indicate whether they used substances on each of the days listed for the last 3 months. No score is given for the measure. However, more days of use is associated with adverse health outcomes.

  3. Youth substance use based on the Timeline Followback Interview at 4 months [ Time Frame: 4 months ]
    The Timeline Followback Interview (TLFB) will be used to estimate substance use. It uses a calendar and asks the participant to indicate whether they used substances on each of the days listed for the last 3 months. No score is given for the measure. However, more days of use is associated with adverse health outcomes.

  4. Change in Youth substance use based on the Screening to Brief Intervention Tool [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 months ]
    The Screening to Brief Intervention instrument, or S2BI, is a 7-item instrument that asks about tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, prescribed drugs, inhalants, illegal drugs, and herbs/synthetic drugs. Responses for each substance can be 'never', 'once or twice', 'monthly', of 'weekly or more'. The result range from "no reported use," "lower risk," or "higher risk." For the lower and higher risk categories the intervention provides guidance for developing an action plan for each response category.

  5. Youth substance use based on the Screening to Brief Intervention Tool at 2 months [ Time Frame: 2 months ]
    The Screening to Brief Intervention instrument, or S2BI, is a 7-item instrument that asks about tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, prescribed drugs, inhalants, illegal drugs, and herbs/synthetic drugs. Responses for each substance can be 'never', 'once or twice', 'monthly', of 'weekly or more'. The result range from "no reported use," "lower risk," or "higher risk." For the lower and higher risk categories the intervention provides guidance for developing an action plan for each response category.

  6. Youth substance use based on the Screening to Brief Intervention Tool at 4 months [ Time Frame: 4 months ]
    The Screening to Brief Intervention instrument, or S2BI, is a 7-item instrument that asks about tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, prescribed drugs, inhalants, illegal drugs, and herbs/synthetic drugs. Responses for each substance can be 'never', 'once or twice', 'monthly', of 'weekly or more'. The result range from "no reported use," "lower risk," or "higher risk." For the lower and higher risk categories the intervention provides guidance for developing an action plan for each response category.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Family Functioning based on the Family Problem Solving Communication Index [ Time Frame: baseline, 2, 4, 6 months ]
    The Family Problem Solving Communication (FPSC) Index is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess both positive and negative patterns of family communication. Answer choices are on a 4-point scale (0 = False, 1 = Mostly False, 2 = Mostly True and 3 = True). The two subscales can be scored separately, with Incendiary Communication measuring negative attributes and Affirmative Communication measuring positive forms of communication.

  2. Family Functioning based on the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment [ Time Frame: baseline, 2, 4, 6 months ]
    Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA) is a validated questionnaire that consists of 25 items for the mother, 25 items for the father, and 25 items for the adolescent. Three broad dimensions are assessed: degree of mutual trust, quality of communication, and extent of anger and alienation. Answers are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (almost never or never) to 5 (almost always or always). The IPPA is scored by reverse-scoring the negatively worded items and then summing the response values in each section.

  3. Depression [ Time Frame: baseline, 2, 4, 6 months ]
    Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology is a 16-item questionnaire that measures rates of depression symptoms. Each answer in the survey is worth between 0 and 3 points. Severity of depression can be judged based on the total score. 1-5 = No depression 6-10 = Mild depression 11-15 = Moderate depression 16-20 = Severe depression 21-27 = Very severe depression.

  4. Perceived Stress [ Time Frame: baseline, 2, 4, 6 months ]
    Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a 10-item psychological instrument for measuring the perception of stress. Answer choices range from 0 to 4 (0=Never and 4=Very Often). PSS scores are obtained by reversing responses (e.g., 0 = 4, 1 = 3, 2 = 2, 3 = 1 & 4 = 0) to the four positively stated items (items 4, 5, 7, & 8) and then summing across all scale items with higher scores indicating higher levels of stress.

  5. Problem Solving [ Time Frame: baseline, 2, 4, 6 months ]
    The Social Problem-Solving Inventory - Revised (SPSI-R) has both a long form (52 questions) and short form (25 questions) and assesses individual's strengths and weaknesses in their problem-solving abilities. The inventory has five component scales to assess problem-solving styles and solution generation: Positive Problem Orientation, Negative Problem Orientation, Rational Problem Solving, Impulsivity/Carelessness Style, Avoidance Style.

  6. Coping based on the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale [ Time Frame: baseline, 2, 4, 6 months ]
    The Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) is a 26-item measure of perceived self-efficacy for coping with challenges and threats. The answer choices are a rating on an 11-point scale. Anchor points on the scale are 0 ('cannot do at all'), 5 ('moderately certain can do') and 10 ('certain can do'). An overall CSES score is created by summing the item ratings with high scores indicate greater coping skills.

  7. Coping based on the Brief COPE [ Time Frame: baseline, 2, 4, 6 months ]
    The Brief COPE is a 28-item multidimensional measure of strategies used for coping or regulating cognitions in response to stressors. There are 14 two-item subscales within the Brief COPE, and each is analyzed separately: (1) self-distraction, (2) active coping, (3) denial, (4) substance use, (5) use of emotional support, (6) use of instrumental support, (7) behavioral disengagement, (8) venting, (9) positive reframing, (10) planning, (11) humor, (12) acceptance, (13) religion, and (14) self-blame. Respondents rate items on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 - "I haven't been doing this at all" to 4 - "I've been doing this a lot." Each of the 14 scales is comprised of 2 items; total scores on each scale range from 2 (minimum) to 8 (maximum). Higher scores indicate increased utilization of that specific coping strategy.

  8. Social support [ Time Frame: baseline, 2, 4, 6 months ]
    The Social Adjustment Scale-Self-Report (SAS-SR) 54-item measure that evaluates the efficacy of pharmacological treatments of mental disorders to provide an understanding of a client's satisfaction with his or her social situation. Answer choices are on a 5-point Likert scale with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.

  9. Stressful Life Events [ Time Frame: baseline, 2, 4, 6 months ]
    The Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire (SLESQ) is a 13-item self-report measure that assesses lifetime exposure to traumatic events. For each event, respondents are asked to indicate whether the event occurred ("yes" or "no"), their age at time of the event, as well as other specific items related to the event, such as the frequency, duration, whether anyone died, or was hospitalization, etc. No score is given for the measure.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   12 Years and older   (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participating parent is receiving treatment for substance use disorder
  • Participating youth is between the ages of 12-25
  • Participating youth has no diagnosis of substance use disorder
  • Parent and youth are both comfortable communicating in English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute family crisis, such as recent or current incarceration, divorce, adult return to substance use, or traumatic event
  • Adult or youth with cognitive limitation or intellectual disability

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04400227


Sponsors and Collaborators
Boston Medical Center
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Caroline Kistin, MD MSc Boston Medical Center
Study Director: Scott Hadland, MD Massachusetts General Hospital
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Boston Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04400227    
Other Study ID Numbers: H-38895
K23DA045085 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract )
First Posted: May 22, 2020    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: July 13, 2022
Last Verified: July 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Boston Medical Center:
parent-youth dyads
modules
prevention of adolescent SUD (substance use disorder)
Family Talk
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Substance-Related Disorders
Chemically-Induced Disorders
Mental Disorders