Development of the Balance Recovery Falls-Efficacy Scale for the Community-dwelling Older Adults
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04087551|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : September 12, 2019
Last Update Posted : October 10, 2019
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Accidental Fall Aging Self Efficacy||Other: Developing the list of items for BRFES||Not Applicable|
This study will progress through two phases
The first phase will recruit 30 older adults from ages of 65 and older living in the community. A study administrator will contact the participants daily over a 21-day period to obtain frequency and type of event experienced e.g. no fall, fall, near fall (hand), near-fall (leg) or near-fall (other). No other details of the event will be ascertained because this preliminary study will be to determine the incidence of near-falls in a sample of community-dwelling seniors.
The second phase will be to develop a scale which operationalize balance recovery confidence in community-dwelling older adults. In the first stage of the study, twelve older adults will be recruited to develop a comprehensive list of relevant items for the scale. Purposive sampling will be used to invite participants from the earlier study. This approach will ensure sample representativeness of the population and to include participants who have had demonstrated an understanding of near-falls and balance recovery maneuvres in the previous study to develop the scale. An exhaustive list of scale items will be generated from two focus group formed by six participants using a nominal group technique. This consensus-based technique ensures that all items in the scale are relevant and comprehensible to the community-dwelling older adults to discriminate the confidence level in one's ability to perform balance recovery maneuvres. The scale will then be sent to a panel of 50 experts including healthcare professionals as well as a new group of community-dwelling older adults to determine the appropriateness of items ensuring that the scale is relevant, comprehensive and comprehensible. Delphi technique will be adopted as the method to obtain a consensus among experts to finalize the Balance Recovery Falls-Efficacy Scale (BRFES).
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||80 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||
Phase 1 Participants will be requested to report the incidence of no fall, near-fall or a fall daily over the next 21-day period. There will be 3 options given to the participants: (1) a daily telephone call at a prearranged timing or (2) a daily text message given at a prearranged timing or both. A study administrator will contact the participant daily using the preferred mode of reporting. All information will be recorded in a logbook.
Phase 2 The development of the Balance Recovery Falls-Efficacy scale will be guided using the COSMIN methodology. This development is based on inputs from the community-dwelling older adults to ensure relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility. The scale would then be validated with a group of healthcare professionals and another new group of community-dwelling older adults using the Delphi method.
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Incidence of Near-falls and the Development of the Balance Recovery Falls-efficacy Scale (BRFES) for the Community-dwelling Older Adults.|
|Actual Study Start Date :||September 11, 2019|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||March 31, 2020|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||June 30, 2020|
Experimental: Developing the list of items for BRFES
Two groups of six community-dwelling older adults will participate in a focus group session. Each focus group session will begin with a trained facilitator using a session guide welcoming the participants and introducing the participants in the group. The session will adopt a nominal group method which includes silent generation of ideas, sharing of an idea in a 'round robin' fashion, group discussion to clarify ideas and then completing the session with anonymous voting to include items into a list of items to be included in the Balance Recovery Falls-Efficacy Scale (BRFES).
Other: Developing the list of items for BRFES
The finalized list of items will be discussed by two researchers who will combine similar items generated by the two focus groups to complete the Balance Recovery Falls-Efficacy Scale. The list of items has been developed by a group of community-dwelling older adults who had demonstrated an understanding of near-falls and will be able to articulate the use of balance recovery strategies used in near-fall experiences.
- Incidence of near-falls [ Time Frame: 6 months ]To determine the incidence of near-falls
- Development of the Balance Recovery Falls-Efficacy Scale (BRFES) [ Time Frame: 9 months ]
To develop and validate the Balance Recovery Falls-Efficacy Scale (BRFES).
The construct measured is the confidence in one's ability to execute balance recovery manoeuvres in common, everyday functional activities to prevent a fall. The scale response option ranged from 1 to 10 with a higher score reflecting higher confidence. The scale would have 16 items indicating a total score range of 16 to 160. A higher total score value represent a better outcome.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04087551
|Contact: Shawn Sohemail@example.com|
|Singapore Institute of Technology||Recruiting|
|Singapore, Singapore, 138683|
|Contact: Shawn Soh 65-96997689 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator:||Shawn Soh||Singapore Institute of Technology|