Sore Throat in Primary Care - a Comparison of Phenoxymethylpenicillin and no Antibiotic Treatment
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04083417|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : September 10, 2019
Last Update Posted : March 11, 2020
Sore throat is the second most common cause of antibiotic prescribing in primary care in Sweden. Guidelines for sore throat focus on identifying people with sore throat where there are 3 and 4 specified criteria and where near patient tests identify group A streptococci (GAS). In these cases, phenoxymethylpenicillin is recommended.
Studies that have identified microorganisms in sore throat show that there are other bacteria and viruses than GAS, that give similar symptoms and that sometimes no microorganism is trapped despite pronounced symptoms. In recent years, a bacterium F. necrophorum has been identified, which is found in increased incidence of sore throat, but it is also found in healthy individuals. In clinical practice, many patients are treated with penicillin even if GAS is not captured. This may be because the doctor perceives the patient as sick or because other bacteria are not caught with a near patient test which causes the doctor to treat anyway.
The specific aims are to in patients with GAS-negative sore throat and 3 and 4 criteria, aged 15 years and older in primary care, study whether phenoxymethylpenicillin treatment shortens the duration of the disease, reduces the symptom intensity and sickness absence, and investigates the importance of other microorganisms than GAS in sore throat.
The study is a randomized controlled trial in which patients with sore throat are randomized to phenoxymethylpenicillin 3 times daily for 10 days or to no antibiotic therapy. There will also be and a reference group with severe (Centor score 3-4), GAS-positive acute tonsillitis.
Blood samples for inflammatory and immunological response to infections are taken. Throat samples for culture of F. necrophorum and streptococcal groups C and G, as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis for bacteria and viruses are also taken at inclusion and at follow-up.
The outcome will be followed in a patient diary for 10 days and at a return visit after 18-24 days where the clinical outcome is asked for and where the blood- and throat samples are repeated.
Follow-up will also takes place via e-mail after 1 and 3 months.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Sore Throat Tonsillitis||Drug: Phenoxymethylpenicillin Other: No antibiotic treatment||Phase 4|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||260 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Streptococcus Group A-negative Acute Tonsillitis in Primary Health Care - a Comparison of Phenoxymethylpenicillin and no Antibiotic Treatment|
|Actual Study Start Date :||September 9, 2019|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||June 2021|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||June 2021|
Active Comparator: Phenoxymethylpenicillin group
Patients randomized to oral phenoxymethylpenicillin 1000 mg three times daily for ten days
tablet PcV 1000 mg x 3 for 10 days
Other Name: Penicillin V (PcV)
Experimental: No antibiotic treatment group
Patients randomized to no antibiotic treatment
Other: No antibiotic treatment
No prescription of antibiotics
- Differences in number of days from inclusion to resolution of symptoms [ Time Frame: 10 days after inclusion ]Differences between the randomized groups. Symptom resolution is defined as the first day the item sore throat and difficulty swallowing is scored less than moderately bad
- Proportions of patients with symptom resolution at each of the days 2 through 10. [ Time Frame: up to 10 days after inclusion ]
- The number of days from inclusion to symptom resolution of the individual items of sore throat symptoms. [ Time Frame: 10 days after inclusion ]
- Differences in number of days from inclusion to the day the patient can put up with the pain. [ Time Frame: up to 10 days after inclusion ]
- The possible change in the self-reported items of symptoms on the rating scale for each of the days 2 through 10 and describe the break through day for improvement [ Time Frame: up to between 10 days after inclusion ]The rating is on a 7-point Likert scale 0=no symptoms, 1= very little, 2=slight, 3=moderately bad, 4=bad, 5=very bad, 6=as bad as it could be.
- The number of days the patient needs to stay at home from work/school [ Time Frame: 10 days after inclusion ]
- Proportion of patients with future episodes of sore throat [ Time Frame: 30 days and 3 months after inclusion ]
- Proportion of patients at follow up with eradication of each of the potential pathogens found. [ Time Frame: between 18 up to 24 days ]Bacteriological eradication
- The number of adverse events [ Time Frame: 3 months after inclusion ]
- Description of patient characteristics and outcomes in the drop-out group. [ Time Frame: 3 months ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04083417
|Contact: Katarina Hedin, Ass Proffirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Jönköping, Sweden, 551 85|
|Contact: David Tell, MD|
|Linköping, Sweden, 586 62|
|Contact: Anna Moberg, MD|
|Malmö, Sweden, 217 51|
|Contact: Mia Tyrstrup, MD,PhD|
|Mariehems hälsocentral||Not yet recruiting|
|Umeå, Sweden, 906 51|
|Contact: Kia Ericsson, MD|
|Ålidhems hälsocentral||Not yet recruiting|
|Umeå, Sweden, 907 36|
|Contact: Helena Lönneborg, MD|
|Växjö, Sweden, 352 36|
|Contact: Jon Pallon, MD, PhD|
|Principal Investigator:||Katarina Hedin, Ass Prof||Region Jönköping County|