Evaluation of a Patient Portal Intervention for Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03947333 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : May 13, 2019
Last Update Posted : February 9, 2021
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Other: My Diabetes Care | Not Applicable |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 300 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Health Services Research |
Official Title: | Evaluation of a Patient Portal Intervention for Diabetes: A Two-arm, Parallel-Design, Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial |
Actual Study Start Date : | March 9, 2020 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | January 11, 2021 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | January 11, 2021 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention
Patients have access to an existing patient web portal (My Health at Vanderbilt) embedded with the My Diabetes Care.
|
Other: My Diabetes Care
The My Diabetes Care is embedded within an existing patient web portal (My Health at Vanderbilt) and includes graphics to visualize and summarize patients' health data, incorporates motivational strategies (e.g., social comparisons and gamification), provides literacy-level sensitive educational resources, and contains secure-messaging capability.
Other Name: Patient-facing Diabetes Dashboard |
No Intervention: Control
Patients will have access to an existing patient web portal (My Health at Vanderbilt) NOT embedded with the My Diabetes Care (i.e., usual care).
|
- Change in Patient Activation at 6 months [ Time Frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up ]The uni-dimensional, 13-item, Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) is a valid measure of patient activation (i.e., the knowledge, skills and confidence a person has in managing their own health and health care). Each item uses a 4-point Likert-type scale of response options ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. PAM-13 item responses result in total raw scores ranging from 13 to 52, which we converted to the linear interval scale of patient activation scores, ranging from 0 (lowest activation) to 100 (highest activation). The PAM-13 has good psychometric properties including excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.87). The PAM-13 scores have been used to predict healthcare outcomes including medication adherence and emergency room utilization.
- Change in Patient Activation at 3 months [ Time Frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up ]The uni-dimensional, 13-item, Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) is a valid measure of patient activation (i.e., the knowledge, skills and confidence a person has in managing their own health and health care). Each item uses a 4-point Likert-type scale of response options ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. PAM-13 item responses result in total raw scores ranging from 13 to 52, which we converted to the linear interval scale of patient activation scores, ranging from 0 (lowest activation) to 100 (highest activation). The PAM-13 has good psychometric properties including excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.87). The PAM-13 scores have been used to predict healthcare outcomes including medication adherence and emergency room utilization.
- Change in Diabetes Knowledge [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow-up ]The Short Diabetes Knowledge Instrument (SDKI) is a valid measure of diabetes knowledge with an emphasis on controlling blood glucose through diet, recognizing symptoms of abnormal blood glucose, and using healthy eating to prevent complications. It also includes items on foot care and the importance of physical activity for preventing cardiovascular complications. The SDKI is a uni-dimensional, 13-item scale with scores ranging from 0 to 13 (number of items answered correctly). SDKI demonstrated good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.73) in a multi-ethnic sample of older adults suggesting the instrument can be used to measure diabetes knowledge in diverse populations (Quandt et al. Diabetes Educator, 2014).
- Change in Diabetes Self-Care [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow-up ]The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activity (SDSCA), developed by Toobert and Glasgow (1994), is a 12-item multidimensional instrument to assess levels of diabetes self-care across five domains: overall diet (2 items), dietary intake of specific foods (3 items), exercise (3 items), medication taking (2 items), and SMBG (2 items). The instrument is based on the self-reported frequency of completing recommended activities during the past 7 days. An example item includes "How often did you follow your recommended diet over the last 7 days?" All responses are converted to percentages. Higher percentages represent better self-care on each subscale. The SDSCA has been used in a number of settings and studies and has been recommended for a standardized evaluation of quality improvement interventions in T2DM in Canada (Majumdar et al., 2005).
- Change in Diabetes Medication Adherence [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow-up ]The Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale-Diabetes (ARMS-D) is a reliable and valid measure of diabetes medication adherence. The 11-item ARMS-D has good internal consistency reliability (α=0.86). Responses range from 1="none of the time" to 4="all of the time," and are summed to produce an overall adherence score ranging from 12-48, with higher scores representing more problems with medication adherence.
- Change in Diabetes Self-Efficacy [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow-up ]The Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale (PDSMS) is a valid measure of diabetes self-efficacy (i.e., how confident they feel about their ability to carry out multiple self management tasks). The uni-dimensional, 8-item scale is scored on a five-point Likert scale. The total PDSMS score can range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating more confidence in self-managing one's diabetes. PDSMS has excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.83). PDSMS scores were associated with observed percentage of low blood sugars (r = .21), BMI (r = -.22), percentage of high blood sugars (r = -.36), average blood glucose (r = -.27), and A1C (r = -.25). Thus, the PDSMS appears to be validly associated with important self-management behaviors as well as with indicators of health status and diabetes control.
- Change in Diabetes Distress [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow-up ]The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID-5) is a valid measure of diabetes distress. The five-item, uni-dimensional scale has scores that range from 0 to 20, with higher scores suggesting greater diabetes-related emotional distress. The PAID-5 has excellent excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.86) and is associated with measures of depression and hemoglobin A1c.
- Satisfaction/Usability of My Health at Vanderbilt (for control group) and My Diabetes Care (for intervention group) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow-up ]The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a valid measure of usability and assesses users' perceptions of ease of use, likability of the interface, and overall satisfaction using a 5- point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). The ten items are scored on a five-point Likert scale. The item scores are summed and then converted to a score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Based on prior research, a score above 68 would be above average and a score of 85 or above suggests excellent usability. The SUS has been used in several studies of patient facing health information technology (the article describing its psychometric properties has been cited over 500 times) and has excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.91).
- System Usage Data for My Health at Vanderbilt (for control group) and My Diabetes Care (for intervention group) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow-up ]User analytics for My Health at Vanderbilt and My Diabetes Care will be captured during the study period and will include: participants' total number of visits, total duration of visits, utilization of embedded features and functionality, and number of alerts and reminders received by participants.
- Change in Blood Glucose Control [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow-up ]Participants' most recent hemoglobin A1C will be abstracted from participants' electronic medical record at enrollment (T0), 3 month follow-up (T1), and 6 month follow-up (T3).
- Change in Blood Pressure Control [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow-up ]Participants' most recent blood pressure measurement will be abstracted from participants' electronic medical record at enrollment (T0), 3 month follow-up (T1), and 6 month follow-up (T3).
- Change in Flu Vaccination Status for 2019-20 Flu Season [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow-up ]The date of the participants' most recent influenza vaccination will be abstracted from participants' electronic medical record at enrollment (T0), 3 month follow-up (T1), and 6 month follow-up (T3).
- Change in Low Density Lipoprotein [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow-up ]Participants' most recent low density lipoprotein measurement will be abstracted from participants' electronic medical record at enrollment (T0), 3 month follow-up (T1), and 6 month follow-up (T3).

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 21 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Currently being treated with at least one antihyperglycemic medication
- Able to speak and read in English
- Reliable access to a computer (desktop or laptop) with internet capabilities
- Active VUMC patient web portal (known as My Health At Vanderbilt) account
Exclusion Criteria:
- Residing in a long term care facility
- Medical condition that affects my memory or ability to think.
- Severe visual impairment
- Currently participating in another diabetes-related research study

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03947333
United States, Tennessee | |
Vanderbilt University Medical Center | |
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203 |
Principal Investigator: | William Martinez, MD, MS | Vanderbilt University Medical Center |
Responsible Party: | William Martinez, MD, MS, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03947333 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
190825 5K23DK106511 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) |
First Posted: | May 13, 2019 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | February 9, 2021 |
Last Verified: | February 2021 |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
Diabetes Patient Activation Patient Web Portals Health Information Technology |
Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Glucose Metabolism Disorders Metabolic Diseases Endocrine System Diseases |