Porcine Xenograft Versus Second Intention Healing
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03931746|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : April 30, 2019
Last Update Posted : March 10, 2020
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Wound Healing and Scar Quality Following Mohs Surgery and Excisional Dermatologic Surgery||Device: Porcine xenograft||Not Applicable|
Porcine xenograft has been used as a barrier to the skin for over 30 years, and due to its wound healing promoting factors, we believe that its use may result in decreased healing time, smaller scar size, better cosmetic outcomes, lower pain levels, and decreased rates of infection and other post-surgical complications.
Upon completion of dermatologic surgery following standard procedures, patients will be randomized into one of two groups (porcine xenograft placement or second intention healing). Weekly follow-up via questionnaires will be conducted as well as a final office visit follow-up at 3 months.
The application of porcine xenograft dressings for wound healing was first studied in 1985, with evidence supporting several benefits when compared to traditional dressings . Subsequent studies have substantiated the use of this dressing for a variety of clinical settings [2,3].
The EZ-DERM™ porcine xenograft is a biosynthetic dressing made from porcine collagen containing aldehyde crosslinking [1,3]. It has been most commonly applied to the management of 2nd degree burns, both partial-thickness and full-thickness defects . This dressing can be used for two healing purposes, either for primary healing or as an intermediate in the preparation for a skin graft .
Compared to other biosynthetic dressings, porcine xenografts afford longer wound adherence and can be stored at room temperature . The xenograft triggers rejection by the surgical defect, increasing local vascularization . It also allows for rapid granulation, a reduced risk of infection, as well as reduced wound-related fluid and thermal losses [6-8]. There is also evidence that the quicker wound healing reduces the frequency of dressings, hospitalization time, pain, and analgesic [9,10].
Several clinical case series have extended the use of porcine xenografts to Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) to facilitate post-operative wound care. Porcine xenograft dressings were determined to be safe, well-tolerated, and able to be applied to a wide anatomical range [3,12].
In addition to biosynthetic dressings, healing via second intention remains an alternative [13,14]. The extremities of elderly patients are a common location for wound granulation. Drawbacks to second intention healing on the extremities include prolonged healing time and extended wound care for the patient .
Chern et. al. completed a review of biological dressings in dermatologic surgery and concluded that there is a limited number of studies focusing on the conclusive benefits of dressings . Although studies have established that EZ-DERM™ was helpful for wound healing following Mohs surgery, there have not been any definitive statistical measures reported in the literature. Additionally, there is a lack of studies assessing the direct comparison to second intention healing.
Our plan is to perform a direct comparison of porcine xenograft placement to second intent healing. Based on the previously studied benefits of the xenograft as a barrier to the skin and one which has wound healing promoting factors, we believe that its use may result in decreased healing time, smaller scar size, better cosmetic outcomes, lower pain levels, and decreased rates of infection and other post-surgical complications.
Our study will allow surgeons to make informed decisions on whether porcine xenograft dressing is superior to that of second intention healing and thus worth considering.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||50 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||To compare wound healing and scar quality following the placement of a porcine xenograft compared to second intention healing of leg wounds following Mohs or excisional surgery.|
|Masking:||Single (Outcomes Assessor)|
|Masking Description:||The evaluator will not have knowledge of or access to the intervention that was performed and represents a provider not involved in the surgical care of the patient.|
|Official Title:||Porcine Xenograft Versus Second Intention Healing: a Randomized, Evaluator-blinded Clinical Trial|
|Actual Study Start Date :||June 11, 2019|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||February 2021|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||February 2021|
Experimental: Porcine Xenograft placement
Porcine xenograft will be placed on the wound.
Device: Porcine xenograft
The EZ-DERM™ porcine xenograft is a biosynthetic dressing made from porcine collagen containing aldehyde crosslinking. It has been most commonly applied to the management of 2nd degree burns, both partial-thickness and full-thickness defects. This dressing can be used for two healing purposes, either for primary healing or as an intermediate in the preparation for a skin graft
No Intervention: No porcine xenograft
The wound will be allowed to heal via second intention.
- POSAS Observer Scale Total Score [ Time Frame: 3 months ]The primary outcome will be the total score of the POSAS observer scale, assessed at the 3-month follow-up visit by two blinded evaluators who will not be involved in the placement of the porcine xenograft. For each patient, scores from the two blinded investigators will be combined by calculating the mean. The POSAS (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale) is a validated assessment tool used for the assessment of all types of scars by professionals and patients. The observer scale is comprised of 6 items (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area) scored on a scale from 1("like normal skin") to 10 ("worst scar imaginable"). The total score is calculated as the sum of the six items (range, 6-60).
- POSAS Patient Scale Total Score [ Time Frame: 3 months ]Study participants will complete the POSAS patient scale at the 3-month follow-up visit. The POSAS patient scale consists of 6 items assessing patients' subjective opinion of scar quality in terms of pain, itching, color, pliability, thickness, and relief. Each item is scored from 1 (normal pigmentation, no itching, etc.) to 10 ("worst imaginable scar or sensation"). The total score of the POSAS patient scale is calculated as the sum of the six items (range, 6-60).
- Healing time [ Time Frame: 3 months ]Healing time will be measured in weeks based on patient's responses to question 1 of the weekly follow-up questionnaire ("Is the wound completely healed (i.e., wound is completely closed with no open areas)?"). For example, a patient who first replies "Yes" to this question on the third weekly follow-up questionnaire will be assigned a healing time of 3 weeks. A more objective measure of healing time would not be feasible given our resources and patient schedule.
- Ratio of scare size to initial defect size [ Time Frame: 3 months ]The initial postoperative defect size will be measured by the investigator prior to intervention in terms of length and width using a sterile ruler. Initial defect area will be calculated as length times width. Scar size will be measured in terms of length and width at the 3-month follow-up visit, and scar area will be calculated as length times width. The outcome will be calculated by dividing the scar area by the initial defect area.
- Pain score at 1 week following surgery [ Time Frame: 3 months ]Patients' pain scores will be measured based on their response to question 2 of the weekly follow-up questionnaire. Patients will be asked to rate their current pain level at the operative site on a scale from 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
- Number of weeks with pain score above 1 [ Time Frame: 3 months ]Patients' pain scores will be measured based on their response to question 2 of the weekly follow-up questionnaire. Patients will be asked to rate their current pain level at the operative site on a scale from 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
- Infection [ Time Frame: 3 months ]Patient's charts will be reviewed at the completion of their 3-month office visit follow-up in order to analyze if they visited the dermatologist between the date of surgery and 3-month office visit and if infection was diagnosed.
- Bleeding [ Time Frame: 3 months ]During each of the weekly follow-up questionnaires and during the 3-month follow-up visit, patients will be asked if they have experienced any post-operative bleeding that led to a visit to the physician (yes/no) and if there was any intervention performed by the physician to stop the bleeding (yes/no). The number and percentage of patients who experienced bleeding at any time during the 3-month follow-up period will be reported.
- Pain at one week [ Time Frame: 3 months ]The proportion of patients with a pain score > 6 at the operative site will be assessed at one week following surgery. This will be based on the patient's response to the weekly follow-up questionnaire, with scores ranging from 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03931746
|Contact: Victoria Sharon, MD||(516) email@example.com|
|Contact: Joshua Burshtein||(516) firstname.lastname@example.org|
|United States, New York|
|Northwell Health Physician Partners Division of Dermatology||Not yet recruiting|
|Bay Shore, New York, United States, 11706|
|Northwell Health Physician Partners Division of Dermatology||Recruiting|
|Lake Success, New York, United States, 11042|
|Principal Investigator:||Victoria Sharon, MD||Northwell Health|