Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03890081|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : March 26, 2019
Last Update Posted : March 26, 2019
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment|
|Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain||Other: Questionnaire|
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Actual Enrollment :||123 participants|
|Official Title:||Coping Strategies Questionnaire: Translation, Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity in Turkish-Speaking Subjects With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain|
|Actual Study Start Date :||May 15, 2017|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||September 14, 2018|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||September 20, 2018|
- Other: Questionnaire
Translate and culturally adapt the original English version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire into Turkish
- Reliability of Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
As a result of the internal consistency analysis, Cronbach's Alpha coefficient was found to be 0.913. This value indicates that the scale has a high level of internal consistency.
For the test-retest analysis of the Turkish version (CSQ-T), a 48-hour time interval was considered to be appropriate, and 40 participants were included in the test. As a result of the analysis, the ICC value was computed for the total score of the scale, which was found to be fairly high (0.876). The results revealed that both the sub-parameters and the total score of the CSQ, and thus the CSQ itself are stable over time.
Based on these findings, the Turkish version of the questionnaire appears to have high reliability.
- Validity of Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
Construct validity was measured by comparing the responses of the scales of the CSQ-T with the responses of the scales of the HADS and SF-36. The total CSQ-T correlated to the anxiety subscale of the HADS with a score of r:-0.603 and to the depression subscale of the HADS with scores of r:-0.471. The SF-36 "PCS" (r: 0.790) and "MCS" (r:822) subscales were observed to have a good and very good correlation with the total score of CSQ-T.
Based on these findings, the Turkish version of the questionnaire appears to have high validity.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03890081
|Ankara, Yenimahalle, Turkey, 06500|
|Study Chair:||Selda BAŞAR||Gazi University|