Effects of TENS on Myocardial Protection in Patients Undergoing AVR
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03859115 |
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : March 1, 2019
Last Update Posted : July 31, 2020
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Myocardial Protection | Procedure: TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) Procedure: sham intervention | Not Applicable |
Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement are randomized to one of six groups: preanesthesia-TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation), preanesthesia-sham, sevoflurane-TENS, sevoflurane-sham, propofol-TENS, propofol-sham. Patients receive TENS or sham stimulation (without electrical pulse generation) at one arm for 30 min under no anesthesia (preanesthesia) or sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia.
In all patients, blood samples are obtained before and after TENS or sham procedure to make plasma dialysate to perfuse rat hearts subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury through Langendorff system.
Cardioprotective effects are determined by comparing infarct sizes of rat hearts perfused with human plasma dialysate, which reflects cardioprotective effects of TENS in human subjects. By comparing infarct size differences, the myocardial protective effects of TENS in various anesthetic conditions can be determined in human subjects undergoing aortic valve replacement.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 30 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Effects of TENS on Myocardial Protection in Patients Undergoing AVR |
Actual Study Start Date : | March 15, 2019 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | April 8, 2020 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | April 4, 2021 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: preanesthesia-TENS
Patients in preanesthesia-TENS group receive TENS for 30 minutes at one arm before anesthesia.
|
Procedure: TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation)
transcutaneous nerve stimulation with electrical pulse generation |
Sham Comparator: preanesthesia-sham
Patients in preanesthesia-sham group receive sham stimulation for 30 minutes at one arm before anesthesia.
|
Procedure: sham intervention
sham stimulation without electrical pulse generation |
Experimental: sevoflurane-TENS
Patients in sevoflurane-TENS group receive TENS for 30 minutes at one arm under sevoflurane anesthesia.
|
Procedure: TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation)
transcutaneous nerve stimulation with electrical pulse generation |
Active Comparator: sevoflurane-sham
Patients in sevoflurane-sham group receive sham stimulation for 30 minutes at one arm under sevoflurane anesthesia.
|
Procedure: sham intervention
sham stimulation without electrical pulse generation |
Experimental: propofol-TENS
Patients in propofol-TENS group receive TENS for 30 minutes at one arm under propofol anesthesia.
|
Procedure: TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation)
transcutaneous nerve stimulation with electrical pulse generation |
Active Comparator: propofol-sham
Patients in propofol-sham group receive sham stimulation for 30 minutes at one arm under propofol anesthesia.
|
Procedure: sham intervention
sham stimulation without electrical pulse generation |
- Infarct size after TENS [ Time Frame: 30 minutes ]Infarct size of rat hearts perfused with dialysate after TENS compared with sham

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 20 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients undergoing aortic valve replacement
Exclusion Criteria:
- co-medications: metformin, nitroglycerine, nicorandil
- discomfort at TENS or loss of intact skin
- uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes mellitus
- severely impaired renal or hepatic function
- peripheral vasculopathy or neuropathy
- did not consent to participate
- pregnancy

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03859115
Contact: Yunseok Jeon | 82-2-2072-2465 | jeonyunseok@gmail.com | |
Contact: Youn Joung Cho | 82-2-2072-3108 | mingming7@gmail.com |
Korea, Republic of | |
Seoul National University Hospital | Recruiting |
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03080 | |
Contact: Yunseok Jeon, MD, PhD 82-2-2072-2467 jeonyunseok@gmail.com | |
Principal Investigator: Yunseok Jeon, MD, PhD |
Principal Investigator: | Yunseok Jeon | Seoul National University |
Responsible Party: | Yunseok Jeon, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03859115 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
TENS_AVR |
First Posted: | March 1, 2019 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | July 31, 2020 |
Last Verified: | July 2020 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | Undecided |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation sevoflurane propofol anesthesia myocardial protection |