Expressive Helping for Stem Cell Transplant Patients

• ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03800758
• Recruitment Status: Completed
• First Posted: January 11, 2019
• Last Update Posted: May 6, 2023
• Sponsor: Northwestern University
• Collaborators: National Cancer Institute (NCI); Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center; Hackensack Meridian Health
• Information provided by (Responsible Party): Christine Rini, PhD, Northwestern University

Study Description

Brief Summary:

The Writing for Insight, Strength, and Ease (WISE) Study is a multisite Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) testing the efficacy of the Expressive Helping (EH) intervention among adults receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Condition or disease	Intervention/treatment	Phase
Stem Cell Transplantation; Hematologic Malignancy	Behavioral: Expressive Helping; Behavioral: Factual Writing	Phase 3

Detailed Description:

Use of stem cell transplant (mostly for hematologic cancers) is expected to increase 5-fold by 2030, when the number of survivors will reach 500,000. This highly toxic treatment causes a range of acute physical and psychological symptoms, which then persist for years for up to 45% of patients. To address gaps in existing symptom-focused behavioral interventions that can be added to standard patient care, the investigators developed Expressive Helping (EH), a low-cost, low-burden intervention that targets a range of physical and psychological symptoms in a broad group of transplant recipients. EH is completed in 4 brief structured writing sessions during and immediately after transplant, with instructions focused on having participants write about their transplant experience. Based on promising preliminary data, the investigators propose to determine whether EH can be used during and immediately after transplant to reduce common acute physical and psychological symptoms and prevent development of persistent physical and psychological symptoms. Assessments of physical symptoms and psychological symptoms will occur at baseline (prior to randomization), "nadir" (Day 7 post-transplant), "engraftment" (Day 14 post-transplant), 1 week post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention (primary endpoint, early post-transplant), 6-months post-intervention, and 12-months post-intervention (primary endpoint, later post-transplant). The investigators will also assess a select set of potential mediators and moderators of intervention effects. Participants will be adult cancer patients scheduled for allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplant at the study sites. After screening and consent, eligible patients will be enrolled in a parallel-group, 1:1 randomized controlled trial. Randomization will be stratified by study site (JTCC, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, LCCC, or Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, RHLCCC); sex (linked with patient outcomes), age (18-59, ≥ 60), and transplant type (autologous, allogeneic). Staff performing assessments will be blind to study assignment. Participants cannot be blinded, but hypotheses will not be revealed to them until trial completion. They will be asked not to reveal their assignment to staff.

Study Design

• Study Type: Interventional (Clinical Trial)
• Actual Enrollment: 405 participants
• Allocation: Randomized
• Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
• Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
• Official Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing Expressive Helping for Stem Cell Transplant Patients
• Actual Study Start Date: March 6, 2019
• Actual Primary Completion Date: April 24, 2023
• Actual Study Completion Date: April 24, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm	Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Expressive Helping writing; Writing sessions 1-3: Participants complete one 20-minute expressive writing session at three time points: 1) after hospitalization but prior to transplant infusion, (2) approximately 3 days after hospital discharge, and (3) approximately 2 weeks after completion of writing session 2. Writing session 4: One 20-40 minute peer support writing session about 1 week after completion of writing session 3.	Behavioral: Expressive Helping; Expressive Helping (EH) is completed in 4 brief structured writing sessions during and immediately after transplant, with instructions focused on having participants write about their transplant experience using previously-tested EH instructions, adapted for this population.
Active Comparator: Factual Writing; Writing sessions 1-3: Participants complete one 20-minute factual session at three time points: 1) after hospitalization but prior to transplant infusion, (2) approximately 3 days after hospital discharge, and (3) approximately 2 weeks after completion of writing session 2. Writing session 4: One 20-40 minute factual writing session about 1 week after completion of writing session 3.	Behavioral: Factual Writing; Factual Writing has been used with cancer patients and in the investigators' prior EH trial. It is completed in 4 brief structured writing sessions during and immediately after transplant, with instructions focused on having participants write about their transplant experience using standard Factual Writing instructions.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures :

1. Symptom severity: Changes in symptom burden [ Time Frame: Baseline to 3-months post intervention ]
   MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Bone Marrow Transplant (MDASI-BMT), which measures both the severity of and interference caused by 13 symptoms, plus 5 transplant-specific symptoms. Symptom severity is rated on a 0-10 scale (0="not present" to 10="As bad as you can imagine") to indicate the severity of symptoms in the past 24 hours. The mean of items are calculated to yield a symptom severity score in which higher scores indicate higher severity.
2. Symptom severity: Changes in symptom burden [ Time Frame: Baseline to 12-months post-intervention ]
   MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Bone Marrow Transplant (MDASI-BMT), which measures both the severity of and interference caused by 13 symptoms, plus 5 transplant-specific symptoms. Symptom severity is rated on a 0-10 scale (0="not present" to 10="As bad as you can imagine") to indicate the severity of symptoms in the past 24 hours. The mean of items are calculated to yield a symptom severity score in which higher scores indicate higher severity.

Secondary Outcome Measures :

1. Symptom severity: Changes in symptom burden [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 7 post-transplant ]
   MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Bone Marrow Transplant (MDASI-BMT), which measures both the severity of and interference caused by 13 symptoms, plus 5 transplant-specific symptoms. Symptom severity is rated on a 0-10 scale (0="not present" to 10="As bad as you can imagine") to indicate the severity of symptoms in the past 24 hours. The mean of items are calculated to yield a symptom severity score in which higher scores indicate higher severity.
2. Symptom severity: Changes in symptom burden [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 14 post-transplant ]
   MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Bone Marrow Transplant (MDASI-BMT), which measures both the severity of and interference caused by 13 symptoms, plus 5 transplant-specific symptoms. Symptom severity is rated on a 0-10 scale (0="not present" to 10="As bad as you can imagine") to indicate the severity of symptoms in the past 24 hours. The mean of items are calculated to yield a symptom severity score in which higher scores indicate higher severity.
3. Symptom severity: Changes in symptom burden [ Time Frame: Baseline to 1-week post-intervention ]
   MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Bone Marrow Transplant (MDASI-BMT), which measures both the severity of and interference caused by 13 symptoms, plus 5 transplant-specific symptoms. Symptom severity is rated on a 0-10 scale (0="not present" to 10="As bad as you can imagine") to indicate the severity of symptoms in the past 24 hours. The mean of items are calculated to yield a symptom severity score in which higher scores indicate higher severity.
4. Symptom severity: Changes in symptom burden [ Time Frame: Baseline to 6-months post-intervention ]
   MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Bone Marrow Transplant (MDASI-BMT), which measures both the severity of and interference caused by 13 symptoms, plus 5 transplant-specific symptoms. Symptom severity is rated on a 0-10 scale (0="not present" to 10="As bad as you can imagine") to indicate the severity of symptoms in the past 24 hours. The mean of items are calculated to yield a symptom severity score in which higher scores indicate higher severity.
5. Depressive symptoms: Changes in depressive symptoms [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 7 post-transplant ]
   Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), is a 20-item measure that asks respondents to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = "Rarely or None of the Time," 1 = "Some or Little of the Time," 2 = "Moderately or Much of the time," 3 = "Most or Almost All the Time"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
6. Depressive symptoms: Changes in depressive symptoms [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 14 post-transplant ]
   Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), is a 20-item measure that asks respondents to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = "Rarely or None of the Time," 1 = "Some or Little of the Time," 2 = "Moderately or Much of the time," 3 = "Most or Almost All the Time"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
7. Depressive symptoms: Changes in depressive symptoms [ Time Frame: Baseline to 1-week post-intervention ]
   Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), is a 20-item measure that asks respondents to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = "Rarely or None of the Time," 1 = "Some or Little of the Time," 2 = "Moderately or Much of the time," 3 = "Most or Almost All the Time"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
8. Depressive symptoms: Changes in depressive symptoms [ Time Frame: Baseline to 3-months post-intervention ]
   Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), is a 20-item measure that asks respondents to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = "Rarely or None of the Time," 1 = "Some or Little of the Time," 2 = "Moderately or Much of the time," 3 = "Most or Almost All the Time"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
9. Depressive symptoms: Changes in depressive symptoms [ Time Frame: Baseline to 6-months post-intervention ]
   Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), is a 20-item measure that asks respondents to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = "Rarely or None of the Time," 1 = "Some or Little of the Time," 2 = "Moderately or Much of the time," 3 = "Most or Almost All the Time"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
10. Depressive symptoms: Changes in depressive symptoms [ Time Frame: Baseline to 12-months post-intervention ]
    Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), is a 20-item measure that asks respondents to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = "Rarely or None of the Time," 1 = "Some or Little of the Time," 2 = "Moderately or Much of the time," 3 = "Most or Almost All the Time"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
11. Generalized Anxiety: Changes in symptoms of generalized anxiety [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 7 post-transplant ]
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7), which measures generalized anxiety symptoms in the past 7 days with 7 items rated on a 0-3 scale (0="Not at all," 1="Several days," 2="More than half the days," 3="Nearly every day"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.
12. Generalized Anxiety: Changes in symptoms of generalized anxiety [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 14 post-transplant ]
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7), which measures generalized anxiety symptoms in the past 7 days with 7 items rated on a 0-3 scale (0="Not at all," 1="Several days," 2="More than half the days," 3="Nearly every day"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.
13. Generalized Anxiety: Changes in symptoms of generalized anxiety [ Time Frame: Baseline to 1-week post-intervention ]
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7), which measures generalized anxiety symptoms in the past 7 days with 7 items rated on a 0-3 scale (0="Not at all," 1="Several days," 2="More than half the days," 3="Nearly every day"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.
14. Generalized Anxiety: Changes in symptoms of generalized anxiety [ Time Frame: Baseline to 3-months post-intervention ]
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7), which measures generalized anxiety symptoms in the past 7 days with 7 items rated on a 0-3 scale (0="Not at all," 1="Several days," 2="More than half the days," 3="Nearly every day"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.
15. Generalized Anxiety: Changes in symptoms of generalized anxiety [ Time Frame: Baseline to 6-months post-intervention ]
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7), which measures generalized anxiety symptoms in the past 7 days with 7 items rated on a 0-3 scale (0="Not at all," 1="Several days," 2="More than half the days," 3="Nearly every day"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.
16. Generalized Anxiety: Changes in symptoms of generalized anxiety [ Time Frame: Baseline to 12-months post-intervention ]
    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7), which measures generalized anxiety symptoms in the past 7 days with 7 items rated on a 0-3 scale (0="Not at all," 1="Several days," 2="More than half the days," 3="Nearly every day"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.
17. Cancer-specific anxiety: Changes in symptoms of cancer-specific anxiety [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 7 post-transplant ]
    Impact of event scale (IES), which includes 15 items that assess difficulties (intrusive thoughts and feelings, avoidance) caused by a traumatic event (in this study, the diagnosis and transplant). Respondents rate how much they were distressed or bothered by each difficulty during the past 7 days using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Responses are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.
18. Cancer-specific anxiety: Changes in symptoms of cancer-specific anxiety [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 14 post-transplant ]
    Impact of event scale (IES), which includes 15 items that assess difficulties (intrusive thoughts and feelings, avoidance) caused by a traumatic event (in this study, the diagnosis and transplant). Respondents rate how much they were distressed or bothered by each difficulty during the past 7 days using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Responses are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.
19. Cancer-specific anxiety: Changes in symptoms of cancer-specific anxiety [ Time Frame: Baseline to 1-week post-intervention ]
    Impact of event scale (IES), which includes 15 items that assess difficulties (intrusive thoughts and feelings, avoidance) caused by a traumatic event (in this study, the diagnosis and transplant). Respondents rate how much they were distressed or bothered by each difficulty during the past 7 days using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Responses are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.
20. Cancer-specific anxiety: Changes in symptoms of cancer-specific anxiety [ Time Frame: Baseline to 3-months post-intervention ]
    Impact of event scale (IES), which includes 15 items that assess difficulties (intrusive thoughts and feelings, avoidance) caused by a traumatic event (in this study, the diagnosis and transplant). Respondents rate how much they were distressed or bothered by each difficulty during the past 7 days using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Responses are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.
21. Cancer-specific anxiety: Changes in symptoms of cancer-specific anxiety [ Time Frame: Baseline to 6-months post-intervention ]
    Impact of event scale (IES), which includes 15 items that assess difficulties (intrusive thoughts and feelings, avoidance) caused by a traumatic event (in this study, the diagnosis and transplant). Respondents rate how much they were distressed or bothered by each difficulty during the past 7 days using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Responses are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.
22. Cancer-specific anxiety: Changes in symptoms of cancer-specific anxiety [ Time Frame: Baseline to 12-months post-intervention ]
    Impact of event scale (IES), which includes 15 items that assess difficulties (intrusive thoughts and feelings, avoidance) caused by a traumatic event (in this study, the diagnosis and transplant). Respondents rate how much they were distressed or bothered by each difficulty during the past 7 days using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Responses are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.
23. Quality of life: Changes in quality of life [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 7 post-transplant ]
    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) V1.2 Global Health measure, which includes 10 items assessing the domains of physical and mental health functioning, rated on a scale from 1-5 or 0 to 10, with specific responses differing across items. Items are summed and conversion tables are used to convert the simple summed raw scores into T-score values for each respondent. T-Score distributions are standardized such that a 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, and the standard deviation around that mean is 10 points. Higher scores indicate better quality of life
24. Quality of life: Changes in quality of life [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 14 post-transplant ]
    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) V1.2 Global Health measure, which includes 10 items assessing the domains of physical and mental health functioning, rated on a scale from 1-5 or 0 to 10, with specific responses differing across items. Items are summed and conversion tables are used to convert the simple summed raw scores into T-score values for each respondent. T-Score distributions are standardized such that a 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, and the standard deviation around that mean is 10 points. Higher scores indicate better quality of life
25. Quality of life: Changes in quality of life [ Time Frame: Baseline to 1-week post-intervention ]
    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) V1.2 Global Health measure, which includes 10 items assessing the domains of physical and mental health functioning, rated on a scale from 1-5 or 0 to 10, with specific responses differing across items. Items are summed and conversion tables are used to convert the simple summed raw scores into T-score values for each respondent. T-Score distributions are standardized such that a 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, and the standard deviation around that mean is 10 points. Higher scores indicate better quality of life
26. Quality of life: Changes in quality of life [ Time Frame: Baseline to 3-months post-intervention ]
    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) V1.2 Global Health measure, which includes 10 items assessing the domains of physical and mental health functioning, rated on a scale from 1-5 or 0 to 10, with specific responses differing across items. Items are summed and conversion tables are used to convert the simple summed raw scores into T-score values for each respondent. T-Score distributions are standardized such that a 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, and the standard deviation around that mean is 10 points. Higher scores indicate better quality of life
27. Quality of life: Changes in quality of life [ Time Frame: Baseline to 6-months post-intervention ]
    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) V1.2 Global Health measure, which includes 10 items assessing the domains of physical and mental health functioning, rated on a scale from 1-5 or 0 to 10, with specific responses differing across items. Items are summed and conversion tables are used to convert the simple summed raw scores into T-score values for each respondent. T-Score distributions are standardized such that a 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, and the standard deviation around that mean is 10 points. Higher scores indicate better quality of life
28. Quality of life: Changes in quality of life [ Time Frame: Baseline to 12-months post-intervention ]
    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) V1.2 Global Health measure, which includes 10 items assessing the domains of physical and mental health functioning, rated on a scale from 1-5 or 0 to 10, with specific responses differing across items. Items are summed and conversion tables are used to convert the simple summed raw scores into T-score values for each respondent. T-Score distributions are standardized such that a 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, and the standard deviation around that mean is 10 points. Higher scores indicate better quality of life
29. Fatigue: Changes in fatigue [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 7 post-transplant ]
    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), which measures level of fatigue in the past 7 days with 13 items rated on a 0-4 scale (0="Not at all," 1="A little bit," 2="Somewhat," 3="Quite a bit," 4="Very much"). Eleven responses are reverse scored and responses are then averaged to yield a scale ranging from 0 to 52, in which higher scores indicate lower fatigue.
30. Fatigue: Changes in fatigue [ Time Frame: Baseline to Day 14 post-transplant ]
    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), which measures level of fatigue in the past 7 days with 13 items rated on a 0-4 scale (0="Not at all," 1="A little bit," 2="Somewhat," 3="Quite a bit," 4="Very much"). Eleven responses are reverse scored and responses are then averaged to yield a scale ranging from 0 to 52, in which higher scores indicate lower fatigue.
31. Fatigue: Changes in fatigue [ Time Frame: Baseline to 1-week post-intervention ]
    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), which measures level of fatigue in the past 7 days with 13 items rated on a 0-4 scale (0="Not at all," 1="A little bit," 2="Somewhat," 3="Quite a bit," 4="Very much"). Eleven responses are reverse scored and responses are then averaged to yield a scale ranging from 0 to 52, in which higher scores indicate lower fatigue.
32. Fatigue: Changes in fatigue [ Time Frame: Baseline to 3-month post-intervention ]
    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), which measures level of fatigue in the past 7 days with 13 items rated on a 0-4 scale (0="Not at all," 1="A little bit," 2="Somewhat," 3="Quite a bit," 4="Very much"). Eleven responses are reverse scored and responses are then averaged to yield a scale ranging from 0 to 52, in which higher scores indicate lower fatigue.
33. Fatigue: Changes in fatigue [ Time Frame: Baseline to 6-month post-intervention ]
    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), which measures level of fatigue in the past 7 days with 13 items rated on a 0-4 scale (0="Not at all," 1="A little bit," 2="Somewhat," 3="Quite a bit," 4="Very much"). Eleven responses are reverse scored and responses are then averaged to yield a scale ranging from 0 to 52, in which higher scores indicate lower fatigue.
34. Fatigue: Changes in fatigue [ Time Frame: Baseline to 12-month post-intervention ]
    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), which measures level of fatigue in the past 7 days with 13 items rated on a 0-4 scale (0="Not at all," 1="A little bit," 2="Somewhat," 3="Quite a bit," 4="Very much"). Eleven responses are reverse scored and responses are then averaged to yield a scale ranging from 0 to 52, in which higher scores indicate lower fatigue.

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Sexes Eligible for Study: All
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• Cancer patients
• Age ≥ 18
• English proficient
• Scheduled for allogeneic or autologous transplant at JTCC, LCCC, or RHLCC.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Current participation in a behavioral intervention targeting symptoms or quality of life
• Cognitive or psychiatric impairment precluding ability to complete informed consent or study procedures
• Literacy limitations precluding completion of a writing study
• Undergoing a tandem transplant where participant is now completing the first of two or more planned transplants

Contacts and Locations

Locations

United States, District of Columbia

Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown University Medical Center

Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007

United States, Illinois

Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611

United States, New Jersey

John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601

Sponsors and Collaborators

Northwestern University

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center

Hackensack Meridian Health

  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by Christine Rini, PhD, Northwestern University:

Informed Consent Form  [PDF] August 23, 2021

More Information

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):

Whitmore L, Schulte T, Bovbjerg K, Hartstein M, Austin J, Luta G, McFarland L, Rowley SD, Nyirenda T, Lewis-Thames M, Stanton AL, Valdimarsdottir H, Graves K, Rini C. Efficacy of expressive helping in adult hematologic cancer patients undergoing stem cell transplant: protocol for the Writing for Insight, Strength, and Ease (WISE) study's two-arm randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Oct 20;22(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05676-w.

• Responsible Party: Christine Rini, PhD, Director, Cancer Survivorship Institute, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University
• ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03800758
• Other Study ID Numbers: PRO2018-0953; R01CA223963 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ); 2018-1306 ( Other Identifier: Georgetown University )
• First Posted: January 11, 2019
• Last Update Posted: May 6, 2023
• Last Verified: May 2023

Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:

• Plan to Share IPD: No
• Plan Description: All IPD will be protected and maintained by the study team

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Hematologic Neoplasms; Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Hematologic Diseases