Immediate Implant Placement With Provisionalization Using Different Bone Grafts as a Space Filling Material in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03741036|
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : November 14, 2018
Last Update Posted : November 19, 2018
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Dental Implant Failed||Procedure: Autogenous bone graft as space filling in immidiate implant placment Procedure: Deprotinized bovien as space filling in immidate implant placement Procedure: Nano-hydroxiapatite alloplast in immidiate implant placement||Not Applicable|
Placement of implants into extraction sockets targets the maintenance of peri implant hard and soft tissue structures and the support of a natural and esthetic contour. The main advantages of immediate implant insertion in comparison with delayed implant placement protocols are as follows: a reduced treatment time, less number of sessions, and, thus, the less invasive procedure. This study examines the clinical performance (survival rate, marginal bone levels and Pink Esthetic Score [PES]) of OsseoSpeed™ implants placed into extraction sockets with immediate provisionalization in the anterior maxilla after a follow‐up of at least 12 months.
The removal of teeth results inevitably in both horizontal and vertical changes of hard and soft tissue dimensions.
Clinical research has shown that the loss of volume in the extraction sockets is high: the biggest bone volumetric changes take place during the first 12 months from the dental extraction, with a reduction of bone volume of 50%, of which 2/3 (30%) are within the first 3 months.
Nowadays to get success in postextraction implantology means managing the early and irreversible alveolar bone dimensional changes following tooth extraction, in order to minimize the negative effects on the aesthetics final.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||30 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Immediate Implant Placement With Provisionalization Using Autogenous Bone Graft Particulates vs Deproteinized Bovine Bone vs Nano-hydroxyapatite Alloplast as a Space Filling Material in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone|
|Estimated Study Start Date :||November 27, 2018|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||July 27, 2019|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||August 17, 2019|
Active Comparator: autogenous bone graft as a space filling material
Autogenous bone from sub mental bone had been grafted in jumping gap between implant and freshely extracted socket
Procedure: Autogenous bone graft as space filling in immidiate implant placment
Active Comparator: deproteinized bovine as a space filling material
Granules of deproteinized bovine bone of 0.25-1.0 mm diameter were used to fill the remaining defect when the distance of the defect wall to the implant surface was > 3 mm.
Procedure: Deprotinized bovien as space filling in immidate implant placement
Active Comparator: nano-hydroxyapatite alloplast as a space filling material
The patient was treated using alloplast material mixed with a nano-bone graft to fill gap between implant and freshely extracted socket
Procedure: Nano-hydroxiapatite alloplast in immidiate implant placement
- Primary stability (marginal bone loss) [ Time Frame: 3 months ]measure device (osstell )
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03741036
|Contact: mohamed tarek, email@example.com|
|Contact: mohamed tarek, master||01060344568||MOHAMED_YUSSIF@dentistry.cu.edu.eg|
|Cairo University||Active, not recruiting|
|Contact: Mohamed Tarek 00201114951862 Mtm.firstname.lastname@example.org|