SharkCore Versus Acquire FNB
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03672032|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : September 14, 2018
Last Update Posted : January 30, 2019
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been established as an effective technique for sampling tissue inside and around the gastrointestinal tract, including the pancreas, liver, lymph nodes, and adrenal glands. EUS-FNA is convenient, minimally invasive, and safe procedure with an estimated sensitivity of 75%-92% and a specificity of 82%-100%.
Diagnosis of various pathologies in the GI tract including solid pancreatic masses, mediastinal or gastric lymph nodes, gastrointestinal submucosal lesions, and peri-rectal lesions require adequate tissue architecture and immunohistochemical analysis. This is difficult to obtain and is frequently insufficient with EUS-FNA cytology alone. The core tissue is required to improve the diagnostic yield and obtain histologic diagnosis along with immunostaining to establish specimen adequacy. In past 1 year two new needle EUS needle (Shark Core)and Acquire EUS needles has been introduced to improve diagnostic accuracy, tissue yield, and potentially obtain a core tissue sample. So far, no prospective studies have compared these two needles to see which one is better for overall diagnostic accuracy. Our goal is to perform a prospective analysis to compare the diagnostic yield and safety profile of these 2 new EUS needle.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|EUS Guided Biopsy||Device: SharkCore Needle Device: Acquire Needle||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||150 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Official Title:||Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing SharkCore FNB Needles With Acquire FNB Needles Regarding Specimen Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy|
|Actual Study Start Date :||October 29, 2018|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||January 2020|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 2020|
|Active Comparator: SharkCore Needle||
Device: SharkCore Needle
SharkCore Needle will be used to obtain biopsy
|Active Comparator: Acquire Needle||
Device: Acquire Needle
Acquire Needle will be used to obtain biopsy
- Is the Acquire Needle non-inferior compared to SharkCore Needle in histologic yield of the sample obtained? [ Time Frame: 12 months ]A pathologist blinded to clinical information will access each Biopsy specimen for adequacy (scoring system where scores of 0 were samples with no material, 1 - sufficient material for limited cytological interpretation; probably not representative, 2 - sufficient material for adequate cytological interpretation, 3 - sufficient material for limited histological interpretation, 4 - sufficient material for adequate histological interpretation, low quality (total material < 1 10 power field in length, 5 - sufficient material for adequate histological interpretation, high quality (> 1 10 power field in length)
- Is the Acquire Needle non-inferior compared to SharkCore Needle in diagnostic accuracy? [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
The diagnostic accuracy was calculated considering malignant diagnoses as a true positive.
A histological or cytological diagnosis of a neoplastic lesion will be considered correct since false-positive diagnoses have been reported to be rare if strict cytological criteria are applied.
The criterion standard for diagnosis of benign, non-neoplastic lesion that will not undergo surgical resection will be based on a combination of clinal impression, imaging characteristics and a clinical course that was consistent with the study diagnosis.
- Is the Acquire Needle non-inferior compared to SharkCore Needle in number of needle passes required to obtain the tissue sample? [ Time Frame: 12 months ]We will be collecting data on how many needle passes are required to get adequate FNB sample for each procedure. In the end, we will use this data to calculate using standard statistical measures to compare the average number of passes required to get adequate sample by both SharkCore and Acquire needle.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03672032
|Contact: Henning Gerke, MDfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: Munish Ashat, MDemail@example.com|
|United States, Iowa|
|University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics||Recruiting|
|Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52402|
|Contact: Henning Gerke, MD 319-384-6582 firstname.lastname@example.org|