ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

SpO2 Accuracy Comparison of Medline ReNewal Sensors to Arterial Blood CO-Oximetry

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03565679
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 21, 2018
Last Update Posted : June 21, 2018
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Clinimark, LLC
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Medline Industries

Brief Summary:

The purpose of this clinical study is to validate the SpO2 accuracy of the Medline ReNewal pulse oximetry sensors during non-motion conditions over the range of 70-100% SaO2 as compared to arterial blood samples assessed by CO-Oximetry. The end goal is to provide supporting documentation for the SpO2 accuracy validation of the ReNewal sensors.

It is required that the Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) performance of the ReNewal pulse oximetry sensors will meet a specification of 3 or better in non-motion conditions for the range of 70 - 100% SaO2 thereby demonstrating an acceptable SpO2 accuracy performance specification.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Arterial Oxygen Saturation Healthy Device: Reprocessed Oximeter Device: Reference Oximeter Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

An oximeter is a device used to transmit radiation at a known wavelength(s) through blood and to measure the blood oxygen saturation based on the amount of reflected or scattered radiation. Pulse oximetry monitoring is considered a standard physiological measurement and is used by clinicians in everyday situations to estimate arterial oxygen saturation. Because an arterial sample of blood is not required to make the measurement, the pulse oximeter can provide non-invasive real time information. The clinical use of pulse oximeters has reduced the frequency and necessity of invasive arterial blood sampling and has helped to improve patient safety by providing continuous information to clinicians about patients' oxygenation status.

The Medline ReNewal Reprocessed pulse oximeter sensors are indicated for single patient use when continuous noninvasive arterial oxygen saturation and pulse rate monitoring are required. Following clinical use, each sensor is returned to Medline ReNewal where it is cleaned, disinfected, and packaged for an additional clinical use. Each sensor is tracked through the reprocessing cycle to monitor the number of times the sensor has been reprocessed. The purpose of this study will be to test the accuracy of the SpO2 component of the devices.

The SpO2 accuracy performance of ReNewal pulse oximetry sensors will be evaluated during non-motion conditions over the range of 70-100% SaO2 and compared to arterial blood samples assessed by CO-Oximetry. A minimum of 10 healthy adult subjects, ranging in pigmentation from light to dark, will be enrolled in the study to meet the study design requirements defined by ISO 80601-2-61:2011 and by the FDA's Guidance for Pulse Oximeters (March 4, 2013). The subjects will have an arterial catheter placed in the radial artery to allow for simultaneous blood samples during stable plateaus of induced hypoxic levels. The investigational devices will be placed on the fingers of both hands for the test sites per the instructions for use. Simultaneous data collection will be set up for each of the systems under test. For the data analysis, the control oximeter will be used to assess the stability of each data point. Data that is found to be unstable will be removed prior to the comparative analysis. Next the CO-Oximeter data will be reviewed to make sure it does not contain any anomalous values such as elevated, low or inconsistent COHb, MetHb, or tHb data. Anomalous values will be removed from the analysis prior to pairing of the SpO2 and SaO2 data. The Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) calculation is used to determine the SpO2 accuracy performance. Success will be achieved with an ARMS of 3 or better showing equivalence to the Gold Standard Reference CO-Oximetry providing documentation to support SpO2 accuracy claims for the investigational device(s).

The study population will include 10-15 healthy non-smoking (or has refrained from smoking for 2 days) competent adults 18-50 years of age. The subject selection will be an equitable distribution of males and females of any race with varying skin tones including at least 2 darkly pigmented subjects or 15% of the subject pool, whichever is larger. Data collection will occur over a 2-5 day period for this study population. Follow-up with each subject will be conducted within 5 days following participation in the study and will be conducted via telephone, text or email.


Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 10 participants
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description: Subjects will recline for the study. Reference sensors will be placed on each subject to evaluate the SpO2 accuracy and performance. Shield material may be used between any adjacent finger sensors to prevent optical crosstalk. Simultaneous data collection will be set up for devices under test. The data from the test devices will be collected by the sponsor or trained Clinimark Study staff. Data will be collected for 1 second intervals data analysis. The SpO2 accuracy of the test devices will be evaluated over the oxygen saturation range between 70-100%.
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
Official Title: SpO2 Accuracy Comparison of Medline ReNewal Sensors to Arterial Blood CO-Oximetry
Actual Study Start Date : May 9, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date : May 10, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date : May 10, 2018

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: MEDLINE RENEWAL PULSE OXIMETRY SENSORS
Reference sensors from the reprocessed oximeter device will be placed on each subject to evaluate the SpO2 accuracy and performance.
Device: Reprocessed Oximeter
An oximeter is a device used to transmit radiation at a known wavelength(s) through blood and to measure the blood oxygen saturation based on the amount of reflected or scattered radiation. Pulse oximetry monitoring is considered a standard physiological measurement and is used by clinicians in everyday situations to estimate arterial oxygen saturation. Because an arterial sample of blood is not required to make the measurement, the pulse oximeter can provide non-invasive real time information.

Sham Comparator: Reference CO-oximetery sensor
A whole blood analyzer (CO-Oximeter) is used as the reference standard device for obtaining the functional SaO2 value from arterial blood samples obtained during the study.
Device: Reference Oximeter
A whole blood analyzer (CO-Oximeter) is used as the reference standard device for obtaining the functional SaO2 value from arterial blood samples obtained during the study.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. SpO2 percentage [ Time Frame: 2 hours ]
    Percentage of SpO2 measured by the Reprocessed Oximeter pulse oximetry sensors during non-motion conditions over the range of 70-100% SaO2 as compared to arterial blood samples assessed by CO-Oximetry.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 50 Years   (Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 10-15 Adults with a minimum of 3 males and a minimum of 3 females, with the balance made up of either
  • Subject must have the ability to understand and provide written informed consent
  • Subject is 18 to 50 years of age
  • Subject must be willing and able to comply with study procedures and duration
  • Subject is a non-smoker or who has not smoked within 2 days prior to the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is considered as being morbidly obese (defined as BMI >39.5)
  • Compromised circulation, injury, or physical malformation of fingers, toes, hands, ears or forehead/skull or other sensor sites which would limit the ability to test sites needed for the study. (Note: Certain malformations may still allow subjects to participate if the condition is noted and would not affect the particular sites utilized.)
  • Females who are pregnant, who are trying to get pregnant, or have a urine test positive for pregnancy on the day of the study
  • Smoker Subjects who have refrained will be screened for COHb levels >3% as assessed with a Masimo Radical 7 (Rainbow)
  • Subjects with known respiratory conditions such as: (self-reported)

    • uncontrolled / severe asthma,
    • flu,
    • pneumonia / bronchitis,
    • shortness of breath / respiratory distress,
    • respiratory or lung surgery,
    • emphysema, COPD, lung disease
  • Subjects with known heart or cardiovascular conditions such as: (self-reported, except for blood pressure and ECG review)

    • hypertension: systolic >140mmHg, Diastolic >90mmHg on 3 consecutive readings (reviewed during health screen).
    • have had cardiovascular surgery
    • Chest pain (angina)
    • heart rhythms other than a normal sinus rhythm or with respiratory sinus arrhythmia (reviewed during health screen)
    • previous heart attack
    • blocked artery
    • unexplained shortness of breath
    • congestive heart failure (CHF)
    • history of stroke
    • transient ischemic attack
    • carotid artery disease
    • myocardial ischemia
    • myocardial infarction
    • cardiomyopathy
  • Self-reported health conditions as identified in the Health Assessment Form (self-reported)

    • diabetes,
    • uncontrolled thyroid disease,
    • kidney disease / chronic renal impairment,
    • history of seizures (except childhood febrile seizures),
    • epilepsy,
    • history of unexplained syncope,
    • recent history of frequent migraine headaches,
    • recent head injury
    • cancer / chemotherapy
  • Subjects with known clotting disorders (self-reported)

    • history of bleeding disorders or personal history of prolonged bleeding from injury
    • history of blood clots
    • hemophilia
    • current use of blood thinner: prescription or daily use of aspirin
  • Subjects with severe contact allergies to standard adhesives, latex or other materials found in pulse oximetry sensors, ECG electrodes, respiration monitor electrodes or other medical sensors (self-reported)
  • Subjects with prior or known allergies to iodine or lidocaine (or similar pharmacological agents, e.g. Novocaine)
  • Failure of the Perfusion Index Ulnar/Ulnar+Radial Ratio test
  • Unwillingness or inability to remove colored nail polish from test digits.
  • Other known health condition, should be considered upon disclosure in health assessment form

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03565679


Locations
United States, Colorado
Clinimark Desaturation Laboratory, Site ID# 001
Louisville, Colorado, United States, 80027
Sponsors and Collaborators
Medline Industries
Clinimark, LLC
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Arthur Cabrera, MD Avista Adventist Hospital, Staff Anesthesiologist

Responsible Party: Medline Industries
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03565679     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: PR 2018-268
First Posted: June 21, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: June 21, 2018
Last Verified: June 2018
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA: No
Pediatric Postmarket Surveillance of a Device Product: No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: No