Working...
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Trial record 18 of 1808 for:    "bone marrow" | Recruiting, Not yet recruiting Studies

Use of Bone Marrow Concentrate for Treatment of Alar, Accessory, and Transverse Ligament Injuries

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03517761
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : May 7, 2018
Last Update Posted : May 7, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Regenexx, LLC

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of using anterior approach through the posterior oropharynx for treating alar and transverse ligament injuries with bone marrow concentrate for patients with craniocervical junction (CCJ) instability.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Craniocervical Injuries Biological: Bone Marrow Concentrate treatment Other: Sham Control Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

This study will be a single-center, prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled study of patients with CCJ instability that are randomized to either bone marrow concentrate (BMC) treatment or a sham procedure to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of using an anterior approach through the posterior oropharynx for treating alar and transverse ligament injuries. Patients will undergo a bone marrow aspiration of approximately 30-60 cc from the posterior superior iliac crest. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) and platelet lysate (PL) will be derived from the bone marrow aspirate and later mixed with the bone marrow nucleated cell layer for those in the treatment group. While under unconscious TIVA anesthesia, the injectate is then injected under fluoroscopy into the area in need of treatment using an anterior approach through the posterior oropharynx with direct visualization of the injection site via endoscopy. Patients assigned to the sham control condition will also undergo a bone marrow aspiration of 30-60 cc to maintain blinding. Control subjects will receive a sham procedure of a small skin puncture to the posterior oropharynx guided under fluoroscopy while under anesthesia. In this group, the BMC will be donated for research purposes and not used clinically. Study patients will be evaluated at 6 and 12 months using patient reported clinical outcome questionnaires and digital motion x-ray. Control patients can crossover to the treatment group after being unblinded at 6-months post-procedure.

As an alternative to invasive surgery, ligament injections of proliferant agents (prolotherapy) have been proposed to treat cervical instability. Our group has used a blinded flexion-extension radiography to demonstrate that injections of cervical proliferant agents (hypertonic dextrose) into the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments can objectively reduce excessive cervical translation in flexion (Centeno et al. 2005). More recently we have published on the use of bone marrow concentrate to demonstrate MRI evidence of robust ACL ligament signal changes consistent with healing and repair (Centeno et al. 2015).

One of the challenges of treating the upper cervical ligaments through injection is that they can't be accessed from the posterior due to obstruction from the cervical spinal cord.Our group has developed an injection technique using an anterior approach through the posterior oropharynx, which allows direct access to the ligaments for injection. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of this procedure in carefully selected CCJ instability patients.


Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 80 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Intervention Model Description: Single-center, prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled study to include 80 subjects total, 40 treated with Bone Marrow Concentrate and 40 subjects treated with a Sham Procedure with cross-over from the sham to active group at 6 months
Masking: Single (Participant)
Masking Description: Participants are blind to treatment condition until 6 months post-procedure. Participants in sham control group can crossover to treatment group at that time.
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Use of Bone Marrow Concentrate for the Treatment of Alar, Accessory, and Transverse Ligament Injuries
Actual Study Start Date : March 23, 2018
Estimated Primary Completion Date : December 2024
Estimated Study Completion Date : June 2025

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Bone Marrow Concentrate treatment
Bone marrow concentrate subjects will undergo a bone marrow aspiration of approximately 30-60 cc. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) and platelet lysate (PL) will be derived from the bone marrow aspirate and later mixed with the bone marrow nucleated cell layer. Injectate will then be used to treat the ligaments in the CCJ.
Biological: Bone Marrow Concentrate treatment
While under unconscious TIVA anesthesia, the injectate is then injected under fluoroscopy into the area in need of treatment using an anterior approach through the posterior oropharynx with direct visualization of the injection site via endoscopy. The alar, transverse, and accessory ligaments are the target areas to be treated with the bone marrow concentrate injectate.

Sham Comparator: Sham Control
Control subjects will also undergo a bone marrow aspiration of 30-60 cc to maintain blinding. Control subjects will receive a sham procedure of a small skin puncture to the posterior oropharynx guided under fluoroscopy while under anesthesia.
Other: Sham Control
Control subjects will receive a sham procedure of a small skin puncture to the posterior oropharynx guided under fluoroscopy while under anesthesia.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Headache Impact Test score change from baseline [ Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 6 months ]
    The difference between treatment groups in the within patient mean change from baseline to 6 months in Headache Impact Test scores.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Neck Disability Index score change from baseline [ Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months ]
    Difference between groups in changes scores for Neck Disability Index scores from baseline and 6 months.

  2. Neck Disability Index score change from baseline [ Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months ]
    Difference between groups in changes scores for Neck Disability Index scores from baseline and 12 months.

  3. Short Form Health Survey change from baseline [ Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months ]
    Difference between groups in changes scores for Short Form Health Survey scores from baseline and 6 months.

  4. Short Form Health Survey change from baseline [ Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months ]
    Difference between groups in changes scores for Short Form Health Survey scores from baseline and 12 months.

  5. Numeric Pain Scale change from baseline [ Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6 months ]
    Difference between groups in changes scores for numeric pain scores from baseline and 6 months, where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain.

  6. Numeric Pain Scale change from baseline [ Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months ]
    Difference between groups in changes scores for numeric pain scores from baseline and 12 months, where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain.

  7. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation improvement rating -modified [ Time Frame: mean at 6 months ]
    Difference between groups for mean improvement scores at 6 months, where -100=100% worse from baseline and 100=100% better or improved from baseline

  8. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation improvement rating -modified [ Time Frame: mean at 12 months ]
    Difference between groups for mean improvement scores at 12 months, where -100=100% worse from baseline and 100=100% better or improved from baseline

  9. Adverse events [ Time Frame: Thru 12 month post procedure ]
    Any complication of adverse event

  10. C1-C2 overhang [ Time Frame: 6 months post procedure ]
    Post-op DMX studies will also be used to quantify any reduction in C1-C2 overhang or ADI.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 65 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Voluntary signature of the IRB approved Informed Consent, 2) Skeletally mature Male or Female ages 18 to 65 3) Disabling symptoms of headache, dizziness, neck pain, or other neuro-musculoskeletal symptoms, that based on physical exam or diagnostic blocks is attributable to the upper cervical spine, for >12 months 4) Symptoms exacerbated by activity and relieved by rest 5) Failed all conservative care 6) Hasn't responded long-term to:

    1. C0-C3 facet injections
    2. Upper cervical prolotherapy or PRP into the posterior stabilizing ligaments (nuchal, supraspinous, interspinous ligaments) 7) Considered a likely cervical fusion candidate 8) Imaging (one of the three)
    1. Upper cervical MRI showing decreased signal in alar, transverse, PAOM, AAOM, or Tectorial membrane
    2. DMX showing 2 mm or greater lateral overhang of C1 on C2 in lateral bending open mouth view or a V shaped ADI in flexion of increased ADI in flexion
    3. Upper cervical rotatory CT that shows excessive C0-C1 rotation 9) Exam is c/w upper cervical injury (ie. tenderness along upper cervical facet joints and/or musculature/skull base, good anesthetic block response (>50% pain relief) to C0-C3 intra-articular facet injections, proprioceptive difficulties) 10) Is independent, ambulatory, and can comply with all post-operative evaluations and visits 11) Patient states strong desire to avoid surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to tolerate injections due to central sensitization (i.e. significant intolerance to manual therapy such as massage, activity such as physical therapy, or an exaggerated pain response to prior injection therapy)
  2. Previous neck surgery that has caused chronic neck pain or radiculopathy
  3. Prior epidural or other milligram dose steroid injection in any area or other neck injection therapy within the past 6 months
  4. Physical infirmity that is incompatible with the procedure and/or anesthesia required for same
  5. Unable to tolerate the injection position
  6. Abnormal anatomy seen on MRI imaging that would make the procedure higher risk (e.g. congenital atlanto-axial fusion, atlas assimilation, upper cervical fracture or surgical fusion)
  7. Inflammatory or auto-immune based pathology (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, polymyalgia, polymyositis, gout, pseudo gout)
  8. Quinolone or Statin induced myopathy/tendinopathy
  9. Severe neurogenic inflammation of the cutaneous nerves
  10. Condition represents a worker's compensation case
  11. Currently involved in a health-related litigation procedure
  12. Is pregnant
  13. Bleeding disorders
  14. Currently taking anticoagulant or immunosuppressive medication
  15. Allergy or intolerance to study medication
  16. Use of and significant physical dependence on a chronic opioid (>20 mg oxycodone equivalent per day)
  17. Documented history of drug abuse within six months of treatment
  18. Any other condition, that in the opinion of the investigator, that would preclude the patient from enrollment

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03517761


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Ehren R Dodson, PhD 720-287-7199 edodson@regenexx.com

Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Colorado
Ehren Dodson Recruiting
Broomfield, Colorado, United States, 80021
Contact: Ehren Dodson, PhD    720-287-7199    edodson@regenexx.com   
Contact: Neven Steinmetz, PhD    3034296448 ext 141    nsteinmetz@regenexx.com   
Principal Investigator: Christopher Centeno, MD         
Sub-Investigator: John Schultz, MD         
Sub-Investigator: John Pitts, MD         
Sub-Investigator: Jason Markle, DO         
Sponsors and Collaborators
Regenexx, LLC

Publications:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Regenexx, LLC
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03517761     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: RSI2017-RCT01
First Posted: May 7, 2018    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: May 7, 2018
Last Verified: April 2018
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No

Keywords provided by Regenexx, LLC:
CCJ
Bone Marrow Concentrate
Stem Cell Therapy
Alar Ligament
Transverse Ligament

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Wounds and Injuries
Trauma, Nervous System
Nervous System Diseases