Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03515265|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : May 3, 2018
Last Update Posted : July 25, 2019
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity||Other: Fiber reinforced resin composite restoration Other: Microhybrid resin composite restoration||Not Applicable|
Restoration of endodontically treated teeth is one of the main challenges in restorative dentistry. There are structural changes in endodontically treated tooth: dehydration of dentin, mutation of collagen due to the effect of irrigation and reduction of hardness. This alteration together with loss of tooth structure inflicts a negative impact on long term prognosis of the endodontically treated tooth increases incidence of dental fracture.
Endodontically treated teeth were restored traditionally by crown but this approach is invasive with many technical and clinical steps that prolong the time of treatment. Adhesive philosophy and resin composite were developed and enhanced within the last thirty years that give clinician conservative option also strengthen, protect the tooth against fracture and changed the doctrine of devitalized tooth must be restored by crown. Current studies encourage applying conservative approach and restoring endodontically treated teeth with bonded restorations, so a lot of classic indications of crown in restoring endodontically treated teeth are questioned now.
Microhybrid resin composite restorations permit application of conservative approach that preserves remaining sound tooth structure. Fiber reinforced resin composite improved strength, toughness and fracture resistance of conventional resin composite and restored teeth.
Fiber reinforcement of conventional resin composite is introduced aiming to improve their physical, mechanical properties and tooth fracture resistance. The improvement of the properties was interpreted due to the rule of fibers in stopping crack propagation and transferring stress from matrix to fibers, also it was suggested that fiber Reinforced Resin Composites decrease polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress. fiber-reinforced resin composites are used as a dentine substitute combined with conventional resin composites as an enamel replacement.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||56 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)|
|Official Title:||Clinical Performance of Direct Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations Versus Direct Microhybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial|
|Estimated Study Start Date :||September 1, 2019|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||July 5, 2020|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||October 25, 2020|
Experimental: Fiber resin composite
Fiber reinforced resin composite restoration used as dentin substitute covered by conventional resin composite
Other: Fiber reinforced resin composite restoration
a type of resin composite with improved strength due to the fiber's action
Other Name: Ever X posterior
Active Comparator: Microhybrid resin composite
Microhybrid resin composite restoration with lower strength compared to Fiber reinforced resin composite restoration
Other: Microhybrid resin composite restoration
a type of conventional resin composite
- Change in the Clinical performance [ Time Frame: Change from the baseline at six months. ]Measured using modified USPHS criteria for clinical evaluation of restoration failure.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03515265
|Contact: Sherifa Kandil, Master||1003605338 ext +email@example.com|
|Contact: Shereen Ibrahim, PHD||1099296591 ext +firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Faculty of Dentistry||Recruiting|
|Contact: SHEREEN IBRAHIM, ASIS PROF SHEREENHAFEZ@DENTISTRY.CU.EDU.EG|
|Contact: SHEREEN IBRAHIM, ASIST PROF SHEREENHAFEZ@DENTISTRY.CU.EDU.EG|
|Study Director:||Mohamed Farid, PHD||Professor of Conservative Dentistry, Cairo University|