The Effect of Footwear Generated Biomechanical Manipulation on Symptoms of Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03194789|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : June 21, 2017
Last Update Posted : December 19, 2018
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Pelvic Floor Disorders Stress Urinary Incontinence||Device: Footwear Generated Bio-Mechanical Manipulation (using shoes with pertupods) along with Traditional Pelvic Floor Therapy Other: Traditional Pelvic Floor Therapy||Not Applicable|
FGBMM (footwear generated biomechanical manipulation) effects neuromuscular patterns of pelvic muscles. While there have been no published studies to our knowledge investigating the effect of FGBMM on urinary incontinence, FGBMM has been shown to cause perturbations in balance and gait that create dynamics similar to dynamic lumbosacral stabilization exercises. In support of this theory, although not published, one of the founders of the technique, Avi Elbaz, has noted anecdotal evidence that patients who had SUI (stress urinary incontinence) and underwent FGBMM for knee or low back pain reported improvement of incontinence. The investigators propose that FGBMM induces the same bio-mechanical improvements as LPSE (lumbopelvic stabilization exercises) which have shown benefit for incontinence. The pods on the footwear can be positioned to challenge the patients balance in a manner similar to the way trampolines are utilized in LPSE. Instead of instructing patients to co-contract the lower trunk and pelvic floor muscles as commonly done for LPSE, the shoes used in FGBMM can be calibrated in a way that causes this co-contraction to occur without the patient realizing. Beneficial pelvis and spine positioning can also be accomplished by strategic placement of the pods without having to instruct the patient on complicated maneuvers. An additional advantage of FGBMM is that this exercise is done with increased intra-abdominal pressure mimicking the condition and the setting when incontinence occurs rather than static exercise that is used in PFT. While performing regular activities, people are naturally squatting and doing other activities that increase intra-abdominal pressure. Furthermore, FGBMM is more practical for people with busy schedules because it can be accomplished with a much smaller time commitment from the patient than traditional PFT since it is done during normal activity. Capitalizing on the excellent adherence and clinical benefits of FGBMM on related conditions, the investigators propose to evaluate the effects of FGBMM in addition to pelvic floor therapy for improving the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence in an urban inner city population.
A potential use of FGBMM using shoes as a addition to traditional pelvic floor therapy may yield a more effective therapy with better adherence. Problems with traditional therapy include poor patient adherence (patients often do not complete the sessions and have poor adherence (about 50%), lack of the continuation in an ongoing program, leading to relapse and need for re treatment or even little clinical benefit. Additionally, access to pelvic floor therapy is limited for many patients since there are not enough available outpatient therapy services to meet the needs of all patients. Finding an additional exercise program that will increase adherence and improve patient outcomes with better clinical benefits is a high priority from both patient care and cost management perspectives.
FGBMM using shoes potentially overcomes many of these issues with improving/modifying abnormal biomechanics of pelvic floor muscles (therefore decreasing incontinence), and a home based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal activity by promoting perturbation. This bio-mechanical approach may significantly improve the symptoms of urinary incontinence in patients with Stress SUI or Mixed urinary incontinence. Capitalizing on the reported excellent adherence and clinical benefit of FGBMM in patients with related conditions, the investigators propose to evaluate the bio-mechanical exercise (wearing an appropriately calibrated shoe at home for a prescribed amount of time each day) as a conservative treatment that may supplement traditional pelvic floor therapy, medications and even surgical intervention for the same in an inner urban city population.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||64 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||Single blinded (evaluator), single-center, randomized controlled trial Interventional and Control group.|
|Masking:||Single (Outcomes Assessor)|
|Masking Description:||Randomized single blinded (evaluator) controlled trial. The outcomes assessor will be masked in the study. Assessor will be independent of randomization, trial coordination and care providers.|
|Official Title:||The Effect of Footwear Generated Biomechanical Manipulation on Symptoms of Stress Urinary Incontinence|
|Actual Study Start Date :||November 29, 2017|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||December 2020|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 2020|
Active Comparator: Traditional Pelvic Floor Therapy
up to six sessions, with one session every alternate week.
Other: Traditional Pelvic Floor Therapy
Participant will receive traditional pelvic floor therapy of six sessions, up-to one sessions every alternate week. This will involve exercise and modalities as decided by medical providers and therapists. Participants will also have a home exercise program prescribed along with each session and for the remainder of six months.
Experimental: FGBMM plus Traditional pelvic floor therapy
Treatment with FGBMM using shoes with pertupods daily at home along with traditional pelvic floor therapy sessions.
Device: Footwear Generated Bio-Mechanical Manipulation (using shoes with pertupods) along with Traditional Pelvic Floor Therapy
Participants will have FGBMM using shoes with pertupods along with traditional pelvic floor therapy over the course of six months. This will include five sessions of gait assessment and re-calibration with daily at home exercise with the device (shoes) over the course of six months. Along with that, participant will receive traditional pelvic floor therapy of six sessions, up-to one sessions every alternate week. This will involve exercise and modalities as decided by medical providers and therapists. Participants will also have a home exercise program prescribed along with each session and for the remainder of six months.
- Severity of Stress Urinary Incontinence [ Time Frame: Six months ]Improvement in symptoms of Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) measured by Urinary Distress Inventory) UDI - 6 questionnaire
- Quality of life [ Time Frame: Six months ]Assessed with a questionnaire Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ-7)
- Pelvic Floor Muscle Activity [ Time Frame: Six months ]Assessment of Pelvic Floor Muscle Activity by surface EMG (electromyography)
- Gait assessment [ Time Frame: Six months ]Objective assessment of patient's gait measured by gait analysis equipment.
- Adherence to treatment [ Time Frame: Six months ]Compliance to FGBMM and PFT using questionnaire.
- 6 minute walk test [ Time Frame: Six months ]objective assessment using maximum distance comfortably walked in 6 minutes on a 100 foot closed course
- Medication costs [ Time Frame: six months ]changes in medication costs assessed by patient interview
- Healthcare utilization [ Time Frame: six months ]Changes in healthcare facility utilization assessed by patient interview
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03194789
|Contact: Atira H. Kaplan, MDemail@example.com|
|Contact: Anna M. Lasak, MDfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|United States, New York|
|Montefiore Medical Center - Medical Park Campuses||Recruiting|
|Bronx, New York, United States, 10461|
|Contact: Atira H. Kaplan, MD 917-331-0611 email@example.com|
|Contact: Anna M. Lasak, MD 718-920-9171 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator:||Anna M. Lasak, MD||Montefiore Medical Center|