Pilates Pelvic Floor Strengthening Program to Improve Urinary Incontinence
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03118557|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : April 18, 2017
Last Update Posted : March 25, 2019
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Stress Urinary Incontinence||Other: Pilates pelvic floor strengthening||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||27 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||HLP-16-003H: Does a Twice Weekly, 12-week Pilates Pelvic Floor Strengthening Program Improve Short- and Long-term Measures of Stress Urinary Incontinence Symptoms in Women Ages 45-70 Years of Age.|
|Actual Study Start Date :||April 19, 2017|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||December 11, 2017|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||December 11, 2017|
|Experimental: Pilates pelvic floor strengthening exercise||
Other: Pilates pelvic floor strengthening
Pilates pelvic floor strengthening.
- Change in score on International Consultation on Incontinence (ICIQ-UI Short Form) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks ]The ICIQ-UI Short Form consists of 3 questions. The ICIQ score is a sum of the responses to the 3 questions with a total possible range of 0 (none) to 21 (all the time/a great deal).
- Change in score on Medical, Epidemiological, Social Aging (MESA) Urinary Incontinence Questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks ]The MESA Urinary Incontinence Questionnaire consists of 3 sections: General questions (unscored), Urge Incontinence (6 questions), and Stress Incontinence (9 questions). The scored questions can range from 0 (never) to 3 (often). The score for the Urge Incontinence is the sum of the responses/18, and the score for the Stress Incontinence section is the sum of the responses/27.
- Change in score on Linear Analogue Self Assessment (LASA) [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks ]The LASA questionnaire consists of 6 questions, each ranging from 0 (as bad as it can be) to 10 (as good as it can be). Therefore, the total possible scores would range from 0 (as bad as it can be) to 60 (as good as it can be).
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03118557
|United States, Minnesota|
|Mayo Clinic in Rochester|
|Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905|
|Principal Investigator:||Deborah J Rhodes||Mayo Clinic|