LIA in Hip Arthroscopy Patients
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03070054 |
Recruitment Status
:
Enrolling by invitation
First Posted
: March 3, 2017
Last Update Posted
: October 5, 2017
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Pain | Drug: 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine-epinephrine | Early Phase 1 |
Hip arthroscopy is a growing field in orthopedic medicine that has gained momentum in recent years as a treatment for an array of hip pathologies including labral tears, chondral injuries, loose bodies, hip instability, femoroacetabular impingement, extraarticular lesions, synovial abnormalities, ruptured ligamentum teres, osteonecrosis, and mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis. With this increased rate of hip arthroscopy has come an interest in adequate postoperative pain management.
There are a number of strategies to improve post-operative orthopedic pain management. One common technique is the femoral block, during which a patient receives an ultrasound-guided injection of local analgesia administered in close proximity to the nerve. In the hip arthroscopy setting, postoperative femoral nerve blocks have been shown to significantly decrease pain, reduce opioid related symptoms like nausea, and have higher pain satisfaction scores than patients using only morphine. However, this option can be costly as it is a separate procedure billed by the anesthesiologist. Regional nerve blocks also carry the risk of residual parasthesia and permanent nerve damage, however rare.
One way to circumvent these limitations is through local infiltration analgesia (LIA), a technique that has been described for post-operative pain management in orthopedic modalities like total knee arthroscopy (TKA) and total hip arthroscopy (THA). Injection of analgesic directly to the surgical site can easily be incorporated as a brief step in the surgical procedure at a minimal cost to the patient. In THA and TKA, LIA has resulted in promising decreases in pain and opioid consumption. However, interpretation of these results in the context of hip arthroscopy has been confounded by the fundamental differences between THA/TKA and hip arthroscopy, the array of different strategies used in LIA (eg. continuous infiltration via a catheter vs. a single shot), and a lack of placebo or control group, and the specific location of injection.
In the setting of hip arthroscopy, a previous group tested intra-portal injections with mixed results. LIA targeting the highly innervated hip capsule, which is cut to access the joint during arthroscopy, may be more efficacious at limiting postoperative pain. LIA injection into the hip capsule can occur under direct visualization after capsular repair. To our knowledge, no studies have assessed the outcomes of this extracapsular LIA technique in the hip arthroscopy setting.
Documented risks involved with LIA are limited to the continuous infiltration via catheter. This approach has the risk of infection at the catheter site as well as cartilage damage. Our proposed technique avoids use of catheters and associated infection. The proposed single dose of 0.25% 20mL bupivacaine epinephrine a fraction of the dosages used in previous LIA studies to avoid chondral damage.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 74 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Double (Participant, Care Provider) |
Masking Description: | Participants, anesthesiologists and PACU nurses will be blinded to group assignment, however the surgeon administering the LIA will be unblinded. |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | LIA in Hip Arthroscopy Patients: An Extra-Capsular Approach |
Actual Study Start Date : | June 2016 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | June 2021 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | June 2021 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Control
non-LIA group prior to surgery
|
|
Experimental: Treatment
Extra-capsular local infiltration analgesic (LIA) administration of 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine-epinephrine
|
Drug: 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine-epinephrine
Extra-capsular local infiltration analgesic (LIA) administration of 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine-epinephrine
Other Name: Marcaine, Sensorcaine
|
- PACU pain scores [ Time Frame: 1-day ]Patient-reported pain in the postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU).

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Senior) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult (>18 years) patients who have elected for hip arthroscopy surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are undergoing bilateral hip arthroscopy in a single surgery.

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03070054
United States, Utah | |
University of Utah Orthopaedic Center | |
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108 |
Principal Investigator: | Stephen Aoki, MD | University of Utah |
Responsible Party: | Stephen Aoki, Principle Investigator, University of Utah |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT03070054 History of Changes |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
90371 |
First Posted: | March 3, 2017 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | October 5, 2017 |
Last Verified: | October 2017 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | Yes | |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No | |
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: | Yes |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Bupivacaine Epinephrine Racepinephrine Epinephryl borate Anesthetics, Local Anesthetics Central Nervous System Depressants Physiological Effects of Drugs Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Adrenergic alpha-Agonists Adrenergic Agonists |
Adrenergic Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Adrenergic beta-Agonists Bronchodilator Agents Autonomic Agents Anti-Asthmatic Agents Respiratory System Agents Mydriatics Sympathomimetics Vasoconstrictor Agents |