Working…
COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation.
Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov.

Get the latest research information from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus.
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

ClarVista HARMONI Toric Trial With Intraoperative Exchange

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03054649
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : February 15, 2017
Results First Posted : June 22, 2020
Last Update Posted : June 22, 2020
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
ClarVista Medical

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the HARMONI® Modular Intraocular Lens System with a toric optic in subjects with pre-existing corneal astigmatism in need of cataract surgery.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Cataract Corneal Astigmatism Aphakia Device: HARMONI® Modular Intraocular Lens System Procedure: Intraoperative optic exchange

Detailed Description:

Subjects were implanted with the HARMONI® Modular Intraocular Lens System (HMIOL). The eye with the higher corneal astigmatism (study eye) was assigned to Cohort 1 and received the HARMONI® Modular Intraocular Lens System with a toric optic. The fellow eye was assigned to Cohort 2 and received the HARMONI® Modular Intraocular Lens System with a non-toric optic during primary implantation, which was replaced with the appropriate optic power (toric or non-toric) during an intraoperative exchange (IOE) procedure. A total of 7 study visits were planned, including a preoperative visit, operative visits for each eye, and 4 follow-up visits at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperative. The total duration of participation for each subject was up to 6 months, which included a Day -90 to Day -0 preoperative period.

Alcon Research, LLC, acquired ClarVista Medical in 2017. This study was designed and conducted by ClarVista Medical, Inc. The study results were collected, analyzed, and provided by ClarVista Medical, Inc. to Alcon Research, LLC.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 44 participants
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Prospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the Exchangeable ClarVista HARMONI Modular Toric Intraocular Lens System for the Treatment of Pre-Existing Corneal Astigmatism and Aphakia Following Cataract Surgery
Actual Study Start Date : June 28, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date : July 18, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date : July 18, 2017

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Cataract

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Cohort 1
Study eye: Primary implantation of HMIOL system with toric optic and no intraoperative optic exchange
Device: HARMONI® Modular Intraocular Lens System
Two-component system consisting of a base and a separate optic that allows for an intraoperative exchange of the optic only without direct manipulation of the capsular bag
Other Name: HMIOL

Experimental: Cohort 2
Fellow eye: Primary implantation of HMIOL system with monofocal optic, followed by intraoperative optic exchange (toric or non-toric optic)
Device: HARMONI® Modular Intraocular Lens System
Two-component system consisting of a base and a separate optic that allows for an intraoperative exchange of the optic only without direct manipulation of the capsular bag
Other Name: HMIOL

Procedure: Intraoperative optic exchange
Removal of one optic and replacement with another during cataract surgery for the purpose of improving refractive outcomes
Other Name: IOE




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Mean Manifest Refraction Cylinder (MRCYL) for Eyes Implanted With HMTIOL [ Time Frame: Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative ]
    A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. Manifest refraction cylinder is the amount of added correction needed to compensate for any astigmatism that may be present. MRCYL was measured in diopters and reported as a negative number, with a less negative number indicating a lesser amount of added correction. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  2. Mean Manifest Refraction Cylinder (MRCYL) Prediction Error (PE) for Eyes Implanted With HMTIOL [ Time Frame: Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative ]
    A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. Manifest refraction cylinder is the amount of power needed to correct any astigmatism that may be present. MRCYL was measured in diopters and reported as a negative number. MRCYL PE was calculated as postoperative MRCYL adjusted to 6 meters minus MRCYL target residual refractive error (TRRE), with a lower absolute value indicating a more accurate cylinder power calculation. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  3. Mean Reduction in Cylinder Power for Eyes Implanted With HMTIOL [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 preoperative), Month 3 postoperative ]
    A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. Manifest refraction cylinder is the amount of power needed to correct any astigmatism that may be present. MRCYL was measured in diopters and reported as a negative number. Cylinder power reduction was calculated as the absolute preoperative magnitude of corneal cylinder (K) minus the absolute postoperative magnitude of MRCYL at the corneal plane. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  4. Mean Percent Reduction in Cylinder Power for Eyes Implanted With HMTIOL [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 preoperative), Month 3 postoperative ]
    A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. Manifest refraction cylinder is the amount of power needed to correct any astigmatism that may be present. MRCYL was measured in diopters and reported as a negative number. Cylinder power reduction was calculated as the absolute preoperative magnitude of corneal cylinder (K) minus the absolute postoperative magnitude of MRCYL at the corneal plane. Therefore, the cylindrical power percent reduction was the cylinder power reduction divided by the absolute value of preoperative magnitude of corneal cylinder (K) × 100. A higher number (greater percent reduction) indicates better astigmatism correction by the toric IOL. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  5. Mean Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Prediction Error (PE) [ Time Frame: Month 3 postoperative ]
    A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. The manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder, and measured in diopters (D). MRSE PE was calculated as postoperative MRSE adjusted to 6 meters minus MRSE target residual refractive error (TRRE). The lower the absolute number, the more accurate the IOL power calculation is. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  6. Mean Absolute Rotation of IOL Meridian [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative ]
    IOL orientation was measured with slit-lamp photography. IOL rotation was defined as the difference between axis of IOL orientation on the day of surgery and the subsequent postoperative visit. IOL rotation was measured in degrees, with a lower number indicating less rotation. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  7. Number of Eyes With Absolute Rotation of IOL Meridian by Visit - Cohort 1 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative ]
    IOL orientation was measured with slit-lamp photography. IOL rotation was defined as the difference between axis of IOL orientation on the day of surgery and the subsequent postoperative visit. IOL rotation was measured in degrees and is reported categorically. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  8. Number of Eyes With Absolute Rotation of IOL Meridian by Visit - Cohort 2 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative ]
    IOL orientation was measured with slit-lamp photography. IOL rotation was defined as the difference between axis of IOL orientation on the day of surgery and the subsequent postoperative visit. IOL rotation was measured in degrees and is reported categorically. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  9. Percentage of Eyes With Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 1 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 operative), Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative ]
    Visual Acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with the correction obtained from manifest refraction testing. BCDVA is reported categorically using the Snellen fraction, which compares the participant's result to the result expected from a 'normal' visual system. The numerator represents the distance between the participant and the chart, and the denominator represents the distance at which a person with 'normal' vision would be able to discern the same letter size. 20/20 is considered to be 'normal' vision, whereas visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  10. Percentage of Eyes With Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 2 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 operative), Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative ]
    Visual Acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with the correction obtained from manifest refraction testing. UCDVA is reported categorically using the Snellen fraction, which compares the participant's result to the result expected from a 'normal' visual system. The numerator represents the distance between the participant and the chart, and the denominator represents the distance at which a person with 'normal' vision would be able to discern the same letter size. 20/20 is considered to be 'normal' vision, whereas visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  11. Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 1 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative ]
    Visual Acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with an optical infinity adjustment of +0.25 diopter (D). The Snellen fraction compares the participant's result to the result expected from a 'normal' visual system. The numerator represents the distance between the participant and the chart, and the denominator represents the distance at which a person with 'normal' vision would be able to discern the same letter size. 20/20 is considered to be 'normal' vision, whereas visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  12. Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 2 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative ]
    Visual Acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with an optical infinity adjustment of +0.25 diopter (D). The Snellen fraction compares the participant's result to the result expected from a 'normal' visual system. The numerator represents the distance between the participant and the chart, and the denominator represents the distance at which a person with 'normal' vision would be able to discern the same letter size. 20/20 is considered to be 'normal' vision, whereas visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  13. Number of Eyes With Preservation of BCDVA at Month 1 and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative ]
    Preservation of BCDVA was defined in terms of lines lost when reading the ETDRS chart at each visit compared to the prior best-achieved BCDVA. Loss of < 1 line included subjects with less than a 1 line loss, no change or improvement in BCDVA. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  14. Number of Ocular Adverse Events Through Month 3 [ Time Frame: Up to Month 3 postoperative ]
    Ocular adverse events were identified as outlined in ISO 11979-2014 Annex B. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  15. Number of Device Deficiencies Post Implantation [ Time Frame: Up to Month 3 postoperative ]
    A Device Deficiency (DD) was defined as a failure of the device to meet its performance specifications or expectations, or otherwise not perform as intended. This could include either a malfunction or damage to the device or any part thereof, regardless of the source of malfunction or damage, including user error, and regardless of the presence of injury (or lack thereof) to subject, user, or bystander. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  16. Number of Secondary Surgical Interventions, Other Than Intraroperative Optic Exchange and Rotational Adjustment of the Toric Optic in Cohort 2 [ Time Frame: Up to Month 3 postoperative ]
    A secondary surgical intervention (SSI) was defined as a surgical procedure that occurred after primary implantation and was conducted for the purpose of resolving residual refractive error (RRE) and optimizing visual outcomes. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

  17. Percent Change in Endothelial Cell Count (ECC) at Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline (preoperative), Month 3 postoperative ]
    High quality images of the corneal endothelium (the single layer of cells on the inner surface of the cornea) were taken at the investigative site and sent to an independent central reading center for evaluation. A negative percent change value may indicate a decrease in the ability of the endothelium to maintain its primary function. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   22 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria

  • Willing and able to return for scheduled treatment and follow-up examinations for up to 6 month study duration.
  • Planned removal of visually significant bilateral cataracts.
  • Pre-existing corneal astigmatism in at least 1 eye.
  • Willing to discontinue contact lens wear for the duration of the study.
  • Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) projected to be 0.2 logarithm Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) or lower.
  • Visual symptoms related to cataracts.

Key Exclusion Criteria

  • History of any intraocular or corneal surgery in either eye (including refractive).
  • Pregnant or lactating.
  • History of any clinically significant retinal pathology or ocular diagnosis in either eye that could alter or limit final postoperative visual prognosis.
  • History of any ocular condition which could affect the stability of the intraocular lens (IOL) in either eye.
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in either eye (per Investigator judgement).
  • Severe dry eye that, in the opinion of the investigator, would impair the ability to obtain reliable study measurements

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03054649


Locations
Layout table for location information
Mexico
ClarVista Investigative Site
Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico, 22320
Philippines
ClarVista Investigative Site
Makati, Manila, Philippines, 1200
Sponsors and Collaborators
ClarVista Medical
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by ClarVista Medical:
Study Protocol  [PDF] December 1, 2016
Statistical Analysis Plan  [PDF] August 14, 2017

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: ClarVista Medical
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03054649    
Other Study ID Numbers: CP-00002
First Posted: February 15, 2017    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: June 22, 2020
Last Update Posted: June 22, 2020
Last Verified: June 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No
Keywords provided by ClarVista Medical:
cataract
intraoperative exchange
intraocular lens
astigmatism
toric
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Cataract
Astigmatism
Aphakia
Lens Diseases
Eye Diseases
Refractive Errors