Urology of Virginia Case Series
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03035487|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 30, 2017
Results First Posted : March 4, 2019
Last Update Posted : May 15, 2019
The investigational protocol describes a small case series designed to compare three imaging modalities for use in visualizing prostate cancer.
The three modalities to be tested are: transrectal micro-ultrasound , and conventional resolution transrectal ultrasound (LR-TRUS) (both as implemented on ExactVu, the multi-frequency novel micro-ultrasound system under investigation), and multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI).
These modalities will be used for guiding systematic (standard, random, extended sextant) plus image-guided targeted prostate biopsies among men with known cancer and an indication for prostate biopsy.
In the case of mpMRI, biopsy will be performed under micro-ultrasound guidance with the radiology report used for targeting.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Prostate Cancer Cancer of the PROSTATE Prostatic Neoplasm||Device: Ultrasound guided prostate exam using SOC ultrasound system Device: mpMRI guided prostate examination using PI-RADS v2 Device: High-resolution micro-ultrasound guided prostate biopsy||Not Applicable|
This trial will enroll nine men with an indication for a prostate biopsy.
The primary objective of the study is to provide guidance to clinicians who will be using the ExactVu system on the appearance of suspicious foci, and the difference between the appearance of these foci in LR-TRUS, mpMRI and transrectal micro-ultrasound images.
The study is being conducted based on the hypothesis that a series of same-subject comparisons will clearly demonstrate the differences in appearance between the modalities.
Procedures in the study are:
- obtain informed consent for the subject
- image the subject using mpMRI according to the PI-RADS v2 protocol, and obtain radiologist's report
- perform biopsy procedure using micro-ultrasound (this may be conducted in a separate subject visit)
- prepare biopsy specimens for pathology
- record all procedure details in a case report form, including pathology and mpMRI reports
The primary endpoint will be a standardized description using keywords of each biopsy sample region. These descriptions will be recorded during the blinded readings after the procedure to avoid added procedure time and will be used to compare appearance between the modalities.
Secondary endpoints are the pathological result of each biopsy sample (Gleason Score and percentage of cancer in sample), and risk score identified on imaging. Both of these values are per-sample, with 12 systematic samples per subject plus any additional targeted samples warranted by standard of care.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||9 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Primary Purpose:||Device Feasibility|
|Official Title:||Urology of Virginia Case Series|
|Study Start Date :||December 2016|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||December 2016|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||February 2018|
Transrectal micro-ultrasound guided prostate biopsy, where images will be compared with images from standard of care modalities:
Device: Ultrasound guided prostate exam using SOC ultrasound system
Device: mpMRI guided prostate examination using PI-RADS v2
mpMRI guided prostate examination using standard of care MRI system
Device: High-resolution micro-ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
Other Name: ExactVu micro-ultrasound imaging system
- Keyword Description of Each Biopsy Sample [ Time Frame: For each patient, keywords will be assigned within one week following the patient's procedure. ]The primary endpoint will be a standardized description using keywords of each biopsy sample region. These descriptions will be recorded during the blinded readings after the procedure to avoid added procedure time and will be used to compare appearance between the modalities. Keywords will be derived from standard lexicons such as PI-RADS for MRI and PRI-MUS for Micro-Ultrasound.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03035487
|United States, Virginia|
|Urology of Virginia|
|Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States, 23452|