Pain in Different Office Hysteroscopy Diameter
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02939196|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified July 2017 by Essam Rashad Abdel-Hafeez Othman, Assiut University.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : October 19, 2016
Last Update Posted : July 21, 2017
The purpose of the investigators'study was To compare 2 different diameter rigid hysteroscopy in vaginoscopic approach regarding pain during and after the procedure.
And to evaluate patient acceptability and tolerability in order to determine the best way to perform hysteroscopy in an outpatient setting.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment|
|Pain Associated Office Hysteroscopy||Procedure: office hysteroscopy 3.7 Procedure: office hysteroscopy 4|
Office hysteroscopy is used as diagnostic tool to investigate abnormal uterine bleeding and other diseases involving the uterine cavity one of The main limitation to its widespread use is feared from pain and low patient tolerability Narrower diameter hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy devices are being developed to improve the acceptability of office hysteroscopy. Miniature optical systems allow performance of most diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy (after proper patient selection) in an outpatient or office setting .Flexible hysteroscopy seem to be less painful at the beginning and during the procedure ,but the optical qualities are poor Hysteroscopy is safe, feasible and accurate procedure for diagnosing intrauterine pathology.
Provision of outpatient based diagnostic and operative services are gaining prominence as a standard of cure but the experience of pain can be off-putting for patients having outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy.
saline solution is an excellent alternative to carbon dioxide in women undergoing outpatient hysteroscopy, and there are fewer complications
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Estimated Enrollment :||140 participants|
|Official Title:||Comparison of Pain Accompanying the Use of 3.7 mm and 4 mm Office Hysteroscopy in Nullipara: A Randomized Clinical Trial|
|Study Start Date :||November 2016|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||July 2017|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 2017|
2.7 mm rigid hysteroscopy.
Procedure: office hysteroscopy 3.7
office hysteroscopy with a 3.7 -mm outer sheath
2.9 mm rigid hysteroscopy.
Procedure: office hysteroscopy 4
office hysteroscopy with a4-mm outer sheath
- Pain more than 4 (according visual analogue scale [ Time Frame: 5 minute ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02939196
|Contact: Essam Othman, MDemail@example.com|
|Assiut, Cairo, Egypt, Egypt, 002|
|Contact: Essam Othman, MD 002|
|Principal Investigator:||Essam Othman, MD||Assiut|