Leukocyte-rich PRP vs Leukocyte-poor PRP for the Treatment of Knee Cartilage Degeneration: a Randomized Controlled Trial (PRP014)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02923700|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : October 4, 2016
Last Update Posted : March 5, 2019
Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) is the most exploited biologic agents currently used for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of different joints, in particular knee OA.
In previous studies, it has been showed its potential to reduce pain and improve functional status in patients treated by simple intra-articular injections. However, there are several PRP formulation currently available in clinical use, and therefore it is very difficult to compare data coming from trials using different products. The most debated aspect concerning PRP formulation is the role of leukocytes, which might stimulate an early inflammatory response in the joint due to the release of metalloproteases and other pro-inflammatory cytokines.
The investigators hypothesized that the presence of leukocytes in PRP could be clinically relevant in terms of outcome, so the present double blind randomized controlled trial was designed to compare leukocyte-rich and leukocyte-poor PRP injections for the treatment of knee OA.
A power analysis has been performed for the primary endpoint of IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) subjective score improvement at the 12-month follow-up for PRP. From a pilot study, a standard deviation of 15.2 points was found. With an alpha error of 0.05, a beta error of 0.2 and a minimal clinically significant difference of 6.7 points corresponding at 1/3 of the documented mean improvement, the minimum sample size was 83 for each group. Considering a possible drop out of 15%, 96 patients per group are required for total 192 patients, selected according to well-defined inclusion criteria (see 'Eligibility criteria' section). Patients are then assigned to two different treatment groups, according to a randomization list. The first group of treatment consists of three weekly intra-articular injections of autologous leukocyte-rich PRP, whereas the second group of patients will be treated by three intra-articular injections of leukocyte-poor PRP.
PRP will be obtained with the following procedure: a 300-ml autologous venous blood sample will undergo 2 centrifugations (the first at 1480 rpm for 6 minutes to separate erythrocytes, and a second at 3400 rpm for 15 minutes to concentrate platelets) to produced 20 ml of leukocyte-rich PRP. In case of patients allocated to receive leukocyte-poor PRP, a special filter will be then used to separate leukocytes and obtain leukocyte-poor PRP.
The total amount of PRP will be divided into 4 small units of 5 ml each. One unit is sent to the laboratory for analysis of platelet concentration and for a quality test, 3 units are stored at -30° C.
One week after the PRP production, the injective treatment starts, with 3 weekly injections. At the moment of the injection the syringe is properly covered to prevent the patient from discovering the substance he was receiving. After the injection, patients are sent home with instructions to limit the use of the leg for at least 24 h and to use cold therapy/ice on the affected area to relieve pain. During this period, the use of non-steroidal medication is forbidden.
Patients are prospectively evaluated basally and at 2, 6, and 12 months of follow-up using clinical subjective scores and objective parameters to determine clinical outcome (see 'Outcome measure' section). Patient satisfaction and adverse events will be also reported. All the clinical evaluations are performed by a medical staff not involved in the injective procedure, in order to keep the study double blinded. At the end of the study, the nature of the injected substance is revealed to the patients.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Osteoarthritis||Biological: Leukocyte-rich PRP intra-articular injections Biological: Leukocyte-poor PRP intra-articular injections||Phase 4|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||192 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Double (Participant, Investigator)|
|Official Title:||Leukocyte-rich PRP vs Leukocyte-poor PRP for the Treatment of Knee Cartilage Degeneration: a Randomized Controlled Trial|
|Study Start Date :||September 2016|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||October 2020|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 2020|
Experimental: Leukocyte-rich PRP group
Three weekly knee intra-articular injections of leukocyte-rich PRP
Biological: Leukocyte-rich PRP intra-articular injections
Experimental: Leukocyte-poor PRP group
Three weekly knee intra-articular injections of leukocyte-poor PRP
Biological: Leukocyte-poor PRP intra-articular injections
- IKDC (International knee documentation committee) score trend over time [ Time Frame: basal (i.e. pre-treatment), 1 month, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment ]
- KOOS (Knee Outcome Osteoarthritis Score) trend over time [ Time Frame: basal (i.e. pre-treatment), 1 month, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment ]
- VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) for Pain trend over time [ Time Frame: basal (i.e. pre-treatment), 1 month, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment ]
- Tegner Score trend over time [ Time Frame: basal (i.e. pre-treatment), 1 month, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment ]
- Adverse events report during follow-up period [ Time Frame: ba1 month, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02923700
|Contact: Elizaveta Kon, MD||+39 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: Giuseppe Filardo, MD||+39 email@example.com|
|Study Chair:||Berardo Di Matteo, MD||I Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy|
|Study Chair:||Alessandro Di Martino, MD||I Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy|
|Study Chair:||Francesco Tentoni, MD||I Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy|
|Study Chair:||Alice Roffi, BA||Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy|
|Principal Investigator:||Elizaveta Kon, MD||I Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy|