Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-eluting Balloons for Below the Knee Peripheral Arterial Disease
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02772224|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified May 2016 by Maoquan Li, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital.
Recruitment status was: Not yet recruiting
First Posted : May 13, 2016
Last Update Posted : May 13, 2016
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Peripheral Arterial Disease||Device: Drug eluting balloon angioplasty Device: Conventional balloon angioplasty||Phase 1|
Over the past decade, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) has established its position in the treatment of below the knee arterial occlusive disease with intermittent claudication and/or critical limb ischemia. However, the efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with conventional balloons, is limited by the high 12-month restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates. Local delivery of newer anti-proliferative drug via drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) has recently shown promising results in the treatment of femoropopliteal disease, and in the BTK area, a reduction in 3-month binary restenosis has been observed compared with historical controls treated with PTA. Drug eluting balloon has three potential advantages: (1) homogenous drug transfer to the vessel wall; (2) highest drug concentrations at the vessel wall at the time of injury; and (3) absence of a stent or delivery polymer.
This study sought to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of new drug (Paclitaxel)-eluting balloons (DEB) for the treatment of below the knee peripheral arterial disease.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||180 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||The Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-eluting Balloons for the Treatment of Below the Knee Peripheral Arterial Disease as Compared to Conventional Balloon Angioplasty: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.|
|Study Start Date :||June 2016|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||September 2016|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||September 2017|
Experimental: Drug eluting balloon angioplasty
Paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty
Device: Drug eluting balloon angioplasty
In the DEB group, the guide wire will be passed through the occluded or stenosed lumen and the predilatation of the target lesion with standard balloon(s) will be performed before dilatation with a paclitaxel-eluting balloon of the diameter, at least about that of the pre-dilatation balloon (Arteryguard, Rientech, Dezhou, China). The drug eluting balloons will then be inflated according to the manufacturer recommendations. The patients will then be followed every six months for a year to compare its treatment efficacy and safety with that of conventional balloon angioplasty group.
Active Comparator: Conventional balloon angioplasty
Conventional balloon angioplasty
Device: Conventional balloon angioplasty
The guide wire will be passed through the occluded or stenosed lumen and the conventional balloons will be inflated as recommended by the manufacturer. The primary and secondary outcome will then be assessed and compared with DEB group, on follow up at six and 12 months.
- Restenosis rate [ Time Frame: 12 months ]The primary study endpoint was the occurrence of > 50% of restenosis in the treated vessel after 12 months as assessed by digital substraction angiography (DSA).
- Peak systolic velocity ratio [ Time Frame: 12 months ]Peak systolic velocity ratio ≥ 2.4 by Doppler's ultrasonography was the end point of the study for the patient who did not undergo angiography after 12 months.
- Rutherford scale [ Time Frame: Immediately after procedure ]Clinical success is to be defined as an improvement in Rutherford scale of at least one category after the procedure.
- ABI value [ Time Frame: Immediately after procedure ]Hemodynamic success is to be defined as an improvement of ABI value by ≥ 0.1 after the procedure and lack of deterioration > 0.15 in relation to the maximal value recorded before the procedure.
- Residual stenosis [ Time Frame: Immediately after procedure ]The technical success of the procedure is to be defined as PTA of a lesion with >30 % residual stenosis and lack of flow rate-limiting dissection immediately after treatment.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02772224
|Contact: Maoquan Li, Ph.Dfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Shanghai Tenth people's hospital, Tongji university|
|Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200072|