Use of Biomaterials as Desensitizer Agents
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02770573|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified April 2017 by Egle Milia, Università degli Studi di Sassari.
Recruitment status was: Active, not recruiting
First Posted : May 12, 2016
Last Update Posted : April 20, 2017
Aim: to investigate the clinical effectiveness over 12 weeks of three different biomaterials, nano-hydroxyapatite based, in the therapy of the dental sensitivity.
Methods: The study is designed as a randomized clinical trial comparing: 1) Cavex Bite&White ExSense, 2) Teethmate™ Desensitizer , 3) Ghimas Dentin Desensitizer. The pain experience was generated by a cold stimulus directly to a sensitive tooth surface and assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The response was recorded before the application of the materials (PRE-1), immediately after (POST-1), at 1-week (POST-2), 4-weeks (POST-3) and 12-week controls (POST-4).
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Dentin Sensitivity||Other: Cavex Bite&White ExSense Other: Kuraray Teethmate™ Desensitizer Other: Ghimas Dentin Desensitizer||Not Applicable|
Participants The study is designed as randomized clinical trial. The participants will be selected from the regular attenders of the Dental Clinic in the University of Sassari, Italy.
• patients will be considered suitable for the study if they have sensitive teeth showing abrasion, erosion, or recession with the exposure of the cervical dentine;
- teeth with subjective or objective evidence of carious lesions, pulpitis, restorations, premature contact, cracked enamel, active periapical infection, or which had received periodontal surgery or root-planning up to 6 months prior to the investigation will be excluded from the study
- professional desensitizing therapy during the previous 3 months, or use of desensitizing toothpaste in the last 6 weeks.
- Patients will be also excluded if they will be under significant medication that could interfere with pain perception (e.g., antidepressants, anti-inflammatory drugs, sedatives, and muscle relaxants).
Randomization Using a computer program (Excel 2010 for Mac OsX), the randomization will be carried on using an individual basis.
Clinical procedure A full medical and dental history will be taken and all the teeth will be carefully examined to confirm the diagnosis of DH. The experience of dentinal hypersensitivity and how this has affected the quality of life of the patients will be evaluated through a specific questionnaire. The nature and scope of the study will be explained and informed consent will be obtained.
A week before the experiment, patients received oral prophylaxis. Non-fluoride toothpaste, soft tooth- brush and oral hygiene instructions will be also provided in order to have standardized habits during the period of the study.
A week before the experiment, patients received oral prophylaxis. Non-fluoride toothpaste (Biorepair, Coswell), a soft toothbrush (Oral-B Sensitive Advantage, Procter & Gamble) and oral hygiene instructions were also provided. The level of sensitivity experienced by each patient was considered as independent of the position of the hypersensitive tooth in the oral cavity. The pain experience was assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) using the methodology described in our previous study. The pain experience was measured using a VAS graded from 1 to 10. The pain stimulus was given by one examiner with the same equipment yielding similar air pressure each time, while another one performed the treatments.
Teeth will be randomly assigned to three groups (N= per group) for the treatment with the three desensitizing agents.
The following dental materials were used following the manufacturers' instructions:
- Cavex Bite&White ExSense (Cavex Holland BV, RW Haarlem, The Netherlands), a water-based mint aroma gel containing hydroxyapatite and potassium nitrate.
- Kuraray Teethmate™ Desensitizer (Kuraray Noritake Dental, Osaka, Japan), Calcium-Phosphate-based powder and a liquid mainly water-based.
- Ghimas Dentin Desensitizer (Ghimas, Bologna, Italy), a fluid desensitizing gel with 30% of nano-hydroxyapatite, added to 70:100 thousandths of micron-sized crystals of nano- hydroxyapatite.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||90 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Long-term Response of Three Biomaterials Used as Desensitizer Agents Under Oral Environmental Exposure.|
|Actual Study Start Date :||March 2016|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||June 2016|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 2017|
Experimental: Patients with dentin hypersensitivity
Patients with evident clinical signs of dentin hypersensitivity The following dental materials will be used following the manufacturers' instructions: Cavex Bite&White ExSense; Kuraray Teethmate™ Desensitizer; Ghimas Dentin Desensitizer.
In view of the treatment with the desensitizing agents, teeth were randomly assigned into four groups.
The application of the materials will be made only once. The effectiveness will be evaluated: immediately after application and after 1, 4, 12 weeks.
Other: Cavex Bite&White ExSense
a water-based mint aroma gel containing hydroxyapatite and potassium nitrate.
Other: Kuraray Teethmate™ Desensitizer
Calcium-Phosphate-based powder and a liquid mainly water-based.
Other: Ghimas Dentin Desensitizer
a fluid desensitizing gel with 30% of nano-hydroxyapatite, added to 70:100 thousandths of micron-sized crystals of nano- hydroxyapatite.
- Evaluation of change of dentinal hypersensitivity after treatment [ Time Frame: before the treatment (PRE-1), immediately after (POST-1), after 1 week (POST-2), 4 weeks (POST-3), and 12 weeks (POST-4). ]The pain experience was assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) using the methodology. The VAS scale consisted of a horizontal line that was 100 mm long, on which 'no pain' was marked on the right-hand extremity and 'unbearable pain' on the other. The patients expressed the intensity of the pain experienced by placing a mark at any point along the continuum. The distance, expressed in millimetres, from the right edge of 'no pain' was used as the VAS score. Each patient was asked to rate the perception of discomfort after the application of air via a dental syringe at 45-60 psi, 1 cm at the cervical third of the tooth after removing supragingival plaque with a low- speed handpiece with pumice powder and without fluoride. The adjacent teeth were covered by cotton rolls. The stimulus was delivered until reaction or up to a maximum duration of 10 s by the same examiner with the same equipment yielding similar air pressure each time.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02770573
|Complex Operative Unit of Dentistry|
|Sassari, Italy, 07100|
|Principal Investigator:||Egle Milia, Prof||Università degli Studi di Sassari|