Working…
COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation.
Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov.

Get the latest research information from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus.
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Study of Niraparib Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Following Response on Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02655016
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : January 13, 2016
Results First Posted : June 11, 2020
Last Update Posted : July 23, 2020
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Gynecologic Oncology Group
European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial Groups (ENGOT)
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Tesaro, Inc.

Study Description
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Brief Summary:
This study is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled (2:1 niraparib:placebo) study in patients with Stage III or IV ovarian cancer. Patients must have completed front-line platinum based regimen with a physician-assessed response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). Additionally, patients must have a normal or >90% decrease in cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) following front-line platinum treatment. The study will assess the efficacy of niraparib as maintenance treatment, as measured by PFS.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Ovarian Neoplasms Ovarian Cancer Drug: Niraparib Drug: Placebo Phase 3

Study Design
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 733 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Niraparib Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Following Response on Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
Actual Study Start Date : July 7, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date : May 17, 2019
Estimated Study Completion Date : March 29, 2024

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Ovarian Cancer

Arms and Interventions
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Niraparib
Administered once daily continuously during a 28 day cycle.
 Drug: Niraparib
Niraparib vs Placebo 2:1 ratio
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Administered once daily continuously over a 28 day cycle
 Drug: Placebo


Outcome Measures
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Progression Free Survival [ Time Frame: Up to 34 months ]
    Progression free survival was defined as the time from the date of treatment randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause in the absence of documented progression, whichever occurs first. It was assessed by the blinded independent central review (BICR). Median and 95% confidence interval (CI) are presented.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Overall Survival [ Time Frame: Up to 34 months ]
    Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death by any cause. Median and 95% CI are presented for overall survival interim analysis.

  2. Time to First Subsequent Therapy (TFST) [ Time Frame: Up to 34 months ]
    Time to first subsequent therapy was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first subsequent anti-cancer therapy or death, whichever occurs first. Median and 95% CI are presented.

  3. Progression-Free Survival-2 (PFS2) [ Time Frame: Up to 34 months ]
    PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of progression on the next anti-cancer therapy following study treatment or death by any cause, whichever occurs first. Median and 95% CI are presented.

  4. Change From Baseline in Participant Reported Outcome (PRO): Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index (FOSI) [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Up to Week 24 ]
    FOSI is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants responded to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale scored from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). FOSI score was calculated as (sum of item scores)*8 divided by (number of items answered). The FOSI score ranged from 0 (severely symptomatic) to 32 (asymptomatic). A higher score indicated a better quality of life (QoL). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose).

  5. Change From Baseline in PRO: European Quality of Life Scale, 5-dimensions, 5-levels of Severity (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Up to Week 24 ]
    The EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated general preference-based, health-related QoL instrument. The five-item measure has 1 question assessing each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The health state is defined by combining the levels of answers from each of the 5 questions. Each health state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code. Health state 5 digit code is translated into utility score, which is valued up to 1 (perfect health) with lower values meaning worse state. EQ-5D-5L utility score ranges from -0.281 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose).

  6. Change From Baseline in Functional Scales of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Up to Week 24 ]
    EORTC-QLQ-C30 incorporates 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting), a global health status/QoL scale (global health status, QoL), and 6 single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulty) assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by participants with cancer. Five functional scales had total 15 items (physical-5, role-2, cognitive-4, emotional-2, and social-2). Each functional scales score was calculated by averaging scores of all scale items and transforming average scores linearly (1 minus [average score minus 1] divided by 3*100). All of the functional scales range in score from 0 to 100. Higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose).

  7. Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/QoL of EORTC-QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Up to Week 24 ]
    EORTC-QLQ-C30 incorporates 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting), a global health status/QoL scale (global health status, QoL), and 6 single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulty) assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by participants with cancer. A global health status/QoL scale had total 2 items. Each global health status/QoL scales score was calculated by averaging scores of all scale items and transforming average scores linearly ([average score minus 1] divided by 6*100). The global health status/QoL scales range in score from 0 to 100. Higher score represents a higher ("better") level of health status/QoL. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose).

  8. Change From Baseline in Symptoms Scales and Symptoms Items (Dyspnea, Appetite Loss, Insomnia, Constipation, Diarrhea and Financial Difficulty) of EORTC-QLQ-C30 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Up to Week 24 ]
    EORTC-QLQ-C30 incorporates 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting), a global health status/QoL scale, and 6 single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulty) assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by participants with cancer. Symptom scale had total 7 items (fatigue-3, pain-2, nausea/vomiting-2). Each symptoms scales and 6 single additional symptoms items score was calculated by averaging scores of all scale items and transforming average scores linearly ([average score minus 1] divided by 3*100). All of the symptoms scales and 6 single additional symptoms scales range in score from 0 to 100. Higher score represents a higher ("worse") level of symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose).

  9. Change From Baseline in Functional Scales of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Ovarian Cancer Module (EORTC-QLQ-OV28) [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Up to 34 months ]
    EORTC-QLQ-OV28 is supplement to EORTC-QLQ-C30. It includes 3 functional scales (body image, sexuality, attitude to disease/treatment) and 5 symptom scales/items (abdominal/gastrointestinal [GI] symptoms, peripheral neuropathy, hormonal/menopausal symptoms, other chemotherapy side-effects, and hair loss). Functional scales score (body Image and attitude to disease/treatment) was calculated by averaging scores of all scale items and transforming average scores linearly (1 minus [average score minus 1] divided by 3*100). Functional scales score (sexuality) was calculated by averaging scores of all scale items and transforming average scores linearly ([average score minus 1] divided by 3*100). All of the functional scales range in score from 0 to 100. Higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose).

  10. Change From Baseline in Symptoms Scale of EORTC-QLQ-OV28 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1, Pre-dose) and Up to 34 months ]
    EORTC-QLQ-OV28 is supplement to EORTC-QLQ-C30. It includes 3 functional scales (body image, sexuality, attitude to disease/treatment) and 5 symptom scales/items (abdominal/GI symptoms, peripheral neuropathy, hormonal/menopausal symptoms, other chemotherapy side-effects, and hair loss). Symptoms scales score was calculated by averaging scores of all scale items and transforming average scores linearly ([average score minus 1] divided by 3*100). All of the symptoms scales range in score from 0 to 100. Higher score represents a higher ("worse") level of symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1 pre-dose).


Other Outcome Measures:
  1. Number of Participants With Any Non-serious Adverse Event (Non-SAE) or Any SAE [ Time Frame: Up to 34 months ]
    An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that occurs in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with study treatment. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly or birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment was categorized as SAE.

  2. Area Under the Curve (AUC) From 0 to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-last]) [ Time Frame: Up to 34 months ]
    Blood samples were planned to be collected for assessment of AUC(0-last).

  3. Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) [ Time Frame: Up to 34 months ]
    Blood samples were planned to be collected for assessment of Cmax.

  4. Number of Participants With Positive HRD Test [ Time Frame: Up to 34 months ]
    Number of participants with positive HRD test was planned to be assessed.


Eligibility Criteria
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient must have histologically confirmed, advanced (FIGO Stage III or IV) high-grade predominantly serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer who have completed first line platinum based chemotherapy (neoadjuvant or adjuvant)
  • Patient must have clinical complete response or partial response following completion of chemotherapy course.
  • All Stage IV patients are eligible, irrespective of residual disease, after primary or interval debulking. Stage III patients are required to have visible residual disease after primary surgery. Patients with inoperable Stage III and IV disease are eligible
  • Patient must agree to undergo central tumor HRD testing
  • Patients of childbearing potential must have negative pregnancy serum test within 72 hours of being dosed
  • Patient must be randomized within 12 weeks of the first day of the last cycle of chemotherapy

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has mucinous or clear cell subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer, carcinosarcoma or undifferentiated ovarian cancer
  • Patient has undergone more than 2 debulking surgeries
  • Patient is to receive bevacizumab as maintenance treatment
  • Patient is pregnant, breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive children, while receiving study treatment and for 180 days after the last dose of study treatment
  • Patient has had prior treatment with a known PARP inhibitor
  • Patient has been diagnosed and/or treated for any invasive cancer (other than study disease) less than 5 years prior to study enrollment.
Contacts and Locations
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02655016


Locations
Show Show 204 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Tesaro, Inc.
Gynecologic Oncology Group
European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial Groups (ENGOT)
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials GlaxoSmithKline
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by Tesaro, Inc.:
Study Protocol  [PDF] August 27, 2019
Statistical Analysis Plan  [PDF] June 19, 2019

More Information
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Publications:

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Tesaro, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02655016    
Other Study ID Numbers: 213359
PR-30-5017-C ( Other Identifier: Tesaro )
First Posted: January 13, 2016    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: June 11, 2020
Last Update Posted: July 23, 2020
Last Verified: July 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No
Keywords provided by Tesaro, Inc.:
Ovarian Cancer
PARP Inhibitor
HRD
HRD positive
 PRIMA
PRIMA Clinical Trial
PRIMA Study
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Ovarian Neoplasms
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Neoplasms
Ovarian Diseases
Adnexal Diseases
Genital Diseases, Female
Genital Neoplasms, Female
Urogenital Neoplasms
 Endocrine System Diseases
Gonadal Disorders
Carcinoma
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
Neoplasms by Histologic Type
Niraparib
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
Enzyme Inhibitors
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Antineoplastic Agents