Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Trial record 1 of 1 for:    NCT02558894
Previous Study | Return to List | Next Study

Phase II Study of MEDI4736 Monotherapy or in Combinations With Tremelimumab in Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02558894
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 24, 2015
Results First Posted : August 2, 2018
Last Update Posted : August 2, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
AstraZeneca

Brief Summary:
A Phase II Open-Label, Multi-Center Study of MEDI4736 Evaluated as Single Agent or in Combination with Tremelimumab in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Drug: MEDI4736 monotherapy Drug: tremelimumab+MEDI4736 Phase 2

Detailed Description:
This is a Phase II, open-label, multi-center study to determine the efficacy and safety of MEDI4736 evaluated as single agent or in combination with tremelimumab in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) whose disease has progressed on fluoropyrimidine containing or gemcitabine-containing first-line chemotherapy.This study will consist of Part A, lead-in, as well as a possible expansion Part B.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 65 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Phase II Open-Label, Multi-Center Study of MEDI4736 Evaluated as Single Agent or in Combination With Tremelimumab in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Actual Study Start Date : November 16, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date : June 15, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date : June 15, 2017

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

Drug Information available for: Durvalumab

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: MEDI4736 monotherapy
MEDI4736 via IV infusion.
Drug: MEDI4736 monotherapy
MEDI4736 via IV infusion.

Experimental: tremelimumab+MEDI4736
MEDI4736+tremelimumab via IV infusion.
Drug: tremelimumab+MEDI4736
tremelimumab+MEDI4736 via IV infusion.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) in All Patients Using Investigator Assessments According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) [ Time Frame: From date of first infusion until confirmed disease progression or death (up to approximately 18 months for the data analysis cut-off) ]
    ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with at least one visit response of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have had reduction in short axis to <10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. A confirmed response meant that a response of CR/PR was recorded at 1 visit and confirmed by repeat imaging, preferably at the next regularly scheduled imaging visit and not less than 4 weeks after the visit when response was first observed with no evidence of progression between the initial and CR/PR confirmation visits. Results are reported as percentage of patients with a confirmed response and percentage of patients with confirmed or unconfirmed responses (i.e., including single visit responses).


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using Investigator Assessments According to RECIST 1.1 [ Time Frame: From date of first infusion until confirmed disease progression or death (up to approximately 18 months for the data analysis cut-off) ]
    PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomisation until the date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the patient had withdrawn from randomised therapy or had received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. Results are reported as median time from randomisation to PFS, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

  2. PFS Rate at 3 Months and at 6 Months [ Time Frame: From date of first infusion until confirmed disease progression or death (up to 3 months and 6 months) ]
    PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomisation until the date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the patient had withdrawn from randomised therapy or had received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. PFS rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative probability of PFS. The PFS rate at 3 months and 6 months was equivalent to the percentage of patients with PFS after 3 months and 6 months, respectively.

  3. Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: From date of first infusion until death (up to approximately 18 months for the data analysis cut-off) ]
    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomisation until death due to any cause. Results are reported as median OS, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

  4. Survival Status, Presented as OS Rate, at 6 Months and at 12 Months [ Time Frame: From date of first infusion until death (up to 6 months and 12 months) ]
    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomisation until death due to any cause. OS rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative probability of survival at each indicated time period. The OS rate at 6 months and 12 months was equivalent to the percentage of patients with OS after 6 months and 12 months, respectively.

  5. Best Objective Response (BoR) Using Investigator Assessments According to RECIST 1.1 [ Time Frame: From date of first infusion until confirmed disease progression or death (up to approximately 18 months for the data analysis cut-off) ]
    BoR was calculated based on the overall visit responses from each RECIST assessment. It was the best response a patient had following date of first dosing but prior to starting any subsequent cancer therapy and prior to RECIST progression or last evaluable assessment in absence of RECIST progression. Categorisation of BoR was based on RECIST using the following response categories: CR and PR for status of 'Response'; Stable Disease (SD) ≥6 weeks, Progressive Disease (PD) and Not Evaluable (NE) for status of 'Non-response'. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs taking as reference the smallest sum on study. NE was only relevant if any of the TLs were not assessed or not evaluable or had a lesion intervention at this visit. Results are reported as number of patients with BoR for each of the indicated categories.

  6. Disease Control Rate (DCR) Using Investigator Assessments According to RECIST 1.1 [ Time Frame: From date of first infusion until confirmed disease progression or death (up to 3 months, 6 months and 12 months) ]
    DCR at 3 months was defined as the percentage of patients who have a BoR of CR or PR in the first 3 months or who have demonstrated SD for a minimum interval of 13 weeks following the start of treatment. DCR at 6 months was defined as the percentage of patients who have a BoR of CR or PR in the first 6 months or who have demonstrated SD for a minimum interval of 26 weeks following the start of treatment. DCR at 12 months was defined as the percentage of patients who have a BoR of CR or PR in the first 12 months or who have demonstrated SD for a minimum interval of 52 weeks following the start of treatment. Results are reported as the percentage of patients with disease control for each of the indicated categories.

  7. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Durvalumab (MEDI4736) [ Time Frame: Blood samples were collected pre-dose on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24, post-dose on Day 1, Week 12 and Week 24, and additionally at 3 months after the last dose (follow-up). ]
    To evaluate PK, blood samples were collected pre- and post-dose and durvalumab (MEDI4736) concentrations in serum were determined. On Day 1 of Cycles 1, 4 and 7 (Weeks 0, 12 and 24), PK samples were collected pre-dose (within 60 minutes prior to treatment with any IP) and post-dose at the end of infusion (within 10 minutes of end of infusion of durvalumab and within 10 minutes of end of infusion of tremelimumab [for patients receiving durvalumab plus tremelimumab]). On Day 1 of Cycle 2 (Week 4), PK samples were collected pre-dose (within 60 minutes prior to treatment with any IP) only. The 3-month follow-up sample for durvalumab was relative to the respective last dose. Results are reported as mean pre- or post-dose durvalumab concentrations as indicated by the individual categories (1 cycle=4 weeks). Samples below lower limit of quantification were treated as missing in the analyses.

  8. PK of Tremelimumab [ Time Frame: Blood samples were collected pre-dose on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 4 and Week 12, post-dose on Day 1 and Week 12, and additionally at 3 months after the last dose (follow-up). ]
    To evaluate PK, blood samples were collected pre- and post-dose and tremelimumab concentrations in serum were determined. On Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 4 (Weeks 0 and 12), PK samples were collected pre-dose (within 60 minutes prior to treatment with any IP) and post-dose at the end of infusion (within 10 minutes of end of infusion of tremelimumab). On Day 1 of Cycle 2 (Week 4), PK samples were collected pre-dose (within 60 minutes prior to treatment with any IP) only. The 3-month follow-up sample for tremelimumab was relative to the respective last dose. Results are reported as mean pre- or post-dose tremelimumab concentrations as indicated by the individual categories (1 cycle=4 weeks). Samples below lower limit of quantification were treated as missing in the analyses.

  9. Presence of Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) for Durvalumab (MEDI4736) [ Time Frame: Immunogenicity samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24, and additionally at 3 months and 6 months after the last dose (follow-up). ]
    ADA prevalence was the proportion of the ADA evaluable set who had an ADA positive result at any point in time, baseline or post-baseline. ADA incidence (treatment-emergent ADA) was the sum of both treatment-induced (post-baseline ADA positive only) and treatment-boosted ADA positive patients as a proportion of the evaluable patient population. Treatment-boosted ADA was defined as baseline positive ADA titre boosted to a 4-fold or higher level following IP administration. Persistently positive was defined as positive at ≥2 post-baseline assessments (with ≥16 weeks between first and last positive) or positive at last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive was defined as at least 1 post-baseline ADA positive assessment and not fulfilling the conditions of persistently positive. Results are reported as number of patients with detectable anti-durvalumab antibodies satisfying each of the indicated categories. Note: 'positive' is denoted by 'pos' in some category titles.

  10. Presence of ADAs for Tremelimumab [ Time Frame: Immunogenicity samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 4 and Week 12, and additionally at 3 months and 6 months after the last dose (follow-up). ]
    ADA prevalence was the proportion of the ADA evaluable set who had an ADA positive result at any point in time, baseline or post-baseline. ADA incidence (treatment-emergent ADA) was the sum of both treatment-induced (post-baseline ADA positive only) and treatment-boosted ADA positive patients as a proportion of the evaluable patient population. Treatment-boosted ADA was defined as baseline positive ADA titre boosted to a 4-fold or higher level following IP administration. Persistently positive was defined as positive at ≥2 post-baseline assessments (with ≥16 weeks between first and last positive) or positive at last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive was defined as at least 1 post-baseline ADA positive assessment and not fulfilling the conditions of persistently positive. Results are reported as number of patients with detectable anti- tremelimumab antibodies satisfying each of the indicated categories. Note: 'positive' is denoted by 'pos' in some category titles.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: -

  1. Histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic PDAC, no more than 1 prior chemotherapy regimen
  2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 or 1
  3. At least 1 lesion, not previously irradiated, that can be accurately measured at baseline as ≥10 mm in the longest diameter (except lymph nodes, which must have short axis ≥15 mm) with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan and that is suitable for accurate repeated measurements

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any concurrent chemotherapy, investigational product , biologic, or hormonal therapy for cancer treatment.
  2. History of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis
  3. Ascites requiring intervention
  4. Brain metastases or spinal cord compression.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02558894


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Florida
Research Site
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
United States, New York
Research Site
New York, New York, United States, 10065
Canada, British Columbia
Research Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 4E6
Canada, Ontario
Research Site
Oshawa, Ontario, Canada, L1G 2B9
Research Site
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
Research Site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
Research Site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
Canada, Quebec
Research Site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3T2
Germany
Research Site
Friedrichshafen, Germany, 88045
Research Site
München, Germany, 81377
Research Site
Tuebingen, Germany, 72076
Korea, Republic of
Research Site
Seongnam-si, Korea, Republic of, 463-707
Research Site
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03080
Research Site
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03722
Research Site
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 06591
Research Site
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-710
Netherlands
Research Site
Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
Research Site
Groningen, Netherlands, 9713 GZ
Research Site
Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6525 GA
Spain
Research Site
Barcelona, Spain, 08035
Research Site
Madrid, Spain, 28034
Sponsors and Collaborators
AstraZeneca
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Eileen M O'Reilly, M.D Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street,New York,NY 10065
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by AstraZeneca:
Study Protocol  [PDF] August 17, 2015
Statistical Analysis Plan  [PDF] February 27, 2017


Additional Information:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: AstraZeneca
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02558894     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: D4198C00001
First Posted: September 24, 2015    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: August 2, 2018
Last Update Posted: August 2, 2018
Last Verified: July 2018

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by AstraZeneca:
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, PDAC
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma
Carcinoma
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
Neoplasms by Histologic Type
Neoplasms
Durvalumab
Tremelimumab
Antibodies, Monoclonal
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
Antineoplastic Agents
Immunologic Factors
Physiological Effects of Drugs