Extra - Abdominal Versus Intra - Abdominal Repair of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Section (EKAM)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02373501|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : February 27, 2015
Last Update Posted : December 4, 2018
To evaluate the effects of extra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision compared to intra-abdominal repair, and to study is there superiority of one technique over the other in terms of primary outcomes - operative( up to 4 hours after beginning of anesthesia) and post operative ( until day 4 after operation ) measurements , secondary outcomes, long-term outcomes and subjective outcomes.
Intra - operative ( during the operation up to 4 hours from anesthesia )
- nausea and vomiting
- intraoperative hypotension
- intraoperative pain
Post operative ( 4 hours from anesthesia and until release from hospital )
- Blood transfusion
- Venous thromboembolism
- Febrile Morbidity
- Wound Infection
- complain of pain 1-10 on day 1 post operative
- time until walking
- number of Days until having bowel movement
- overall satisfactory
- Operative time
- Estimated blood loss ( ebl ) - hemoglobin levels
- Hospital stay
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Cesarean Wound Repair||Procedure: Intra-abdominal repair Procedure: Extra-abdominal repair||Not Applicable|
Cesarean section (CS) delivery is one of the most frequent surgical procedures to be performed worldwide and rates of CS delivery are increasing. In the late 80's, the rate of caesarean deliveries was 10-13 % in most of the big hospitals in Israel, and today it reaches up to 20-25% of all deliveries.
Numerous different surgical techniques for caesarean section delivery have been described, and the debate about the optimal caesarean technique to minimize surgical morbidity is ongoing.
One of the more controversial issues regarding caesarean technique is the manner by which uterine repair is conducted after delivery of the infant(s) and placenta.
Two techniques are being used depending on the uterus position during repairmen : In situ within the peritoneal cavity (intra- abdominal repair) or temporarily exteriorized onto the mother's abdomen (extra- abdominal repair).
Arguments in favor of temporary exteriorization include better visualization of any uterine extensions and more rapid uterine repair with consequent reductions in both operative time and intraoperative blood loss. Opponents of extraabdominal repair argue that this technique increases rates of intraoperative nausea and vomiting, adnexal trauma on replacement, possible infection, and venous air embolism (VAE) .
On this study the investigators prospectively recruit women who are about to be electively operated. The patients will be randomized into two groups - extra- abdominal versus intra-abdominal uterine repair using computer randomization. Different charts will be for first CS delivery versus recurrent CS delivery. The patient won't know to which group she was designated . On day three after operation - she will be asked to fill out questionnaire with one of the investigators for subjective measurements
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||95 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Official Title:||Extra - Abdominal Versus Intra - Abdominal Repair of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Section|
|Study Start Date :||January 2013|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||December 1, 2018|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||December 1, 2018|
Experimental: intra-abdominal repair
intra-abdominal repair of uterine incision, after delivery of the fetus and the placenta.
Procedure: Intra-abdominal repair
Intra abdominal repair of uterine incision
Experimental: extra-abdominal repair
extra-abdominal repair of uterine incision, after delivery of the fetus and the placenta.
Procedure: Extra-abdominal repair
Extra abdominal repair of uterine incision
- nausea and vomiting [ Time Frame: during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia ]
- intraoperative hypotension [ Time Frame: during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia ]
- intraoperative pain [ Time Frame: during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia ]
- Blood transfusion [ Time Frame: during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia ]
- Venous thromboembolism [ Time Frame: durind operation - 4 hours from anasthesia ]
- Febrile Morbidity [ Time Frame: post operative - untill release from hospitalization usually day 4 ]
- Endometritis [ Time Frame: post operative- untill release from hospitalization usually day 4 ]
- Wound Infection [ Time Frame: post operative- untill release from hospitalization usually day 4 ]
- Death [ Time Frame: post operative - untill release from hospitalization usually day 4 ]
- Operative time [ Time Frame: operative time - since anasthesia untill closure of skin ]
- Estimated blood loss ( ebl ) - HGB levels [ Time Frame: operative- 4 hours from anasthesia ]
- Hospital stay [ Time Frame: post operative ]
- complain of pain 1-10 on day 1 post operative [ Time Frame: post operative - on day 3 post operative ]
- time from surgery until first walking [ Time Frame: post operative - during hospitalization ]
- number of Days until having bowel movement, [ Time Frame: post operative - during hospitalization ]
- overall satisfactory [ Time Frame: post operative - during hospitalization ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02373501
|Sheba Medical Center|
|Ramat - Gan, Israel|
|Principal Investigator:||Elias Castel, MD||Sheba Medical Center|