Evaluation of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator in Brugada Patients (S-ICD Brugada)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02344277|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 22, 2015
Last Update Posted : April 29, 2019
Brugada syndrome is an inherited arrhythmia syndrome with an increased risk of syncope and sudden death resulting from episodes of polymorphic ventricular tachychardia and fibrillation. Currently, there is no medical therapy for the Brugada syndrome and the only treatment available is the implantation of an ICD. There is no discussion on the interest of the ICD implantation in secondary prevention and in patients who experienced syncope but the best therapeutic is more difficult to draw in asymptomatic patients. Recently we demonstrated that in asymptomatic patients with a spontaneous type 1 aspect of Brugada syndrome, (i) there was a significant risk of ventricular arrhythmia, (ii) the problem of inappropriate shocks can be solve with a good ICD programming and (iii) the problem of lead failure remains the main problem in this young population very active and represent the main limitation to larger indication of ICD implantation in this population with a very long life expectancy as these patients had a normal life expectancy except the risk of ventricular arrhythmia.
In this context the S-ICD System (Boston Scientific Inc.) which is an implantable defibrillator technology that treats ventricular tachyarrhythmias using a subcutaneous pulse generator and electrode system rather than a transvenous lead system, represents a very attractive opportunity as it gives the possibility to protect the patients of the risk of ventricular arrhythmia with no risk of lead failure. However, as this is a new technology and as Brugada syndrome patients are a very specific population (very active patients, specific and changing over time ECG aspect that is at risk of T wave over sensing and high risk of SVT), it seems important to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of S-ICD in this specific context.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment|
|Brugada Syndrome S-ICD System (Implantable Defibrillator)||Device: S-ICD System (implantable defibrillator)|
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Actual Enrollment :||130 participants|
|Official Title:||Evaluation of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator in Brugada Patients|
|Actual Study Start Date :||May 12, 2015|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||April 25, 2019|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||April 25, 2019|
- Device: S-ICD System (implantable defibrillator)
The subjects will be symptomatic or asymptomatic Brugada patients with Indication for ICD replacement. Patients should be follow first at 1 month and then every 6 months according to the recent ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines60, for a period of 5 years until remote monitoring became available for S-ICD.
Visit to 4 week post-implantation: Vital status, Clinical assessment data: weight; height; blood pressure; NYHA class, Exercise test will be performed to control sensing vectors during exercise, Electrocardiogram, Current cardiac medication, Device interrogation, Device programming, Save to USB pen drive data + Printouts Adverse events, Life quality evaluation form. Visit every 6 months post-implantation to 5 years follow-up visit: Vital status, Clinical status (e.g.NYHA) , Electrocardiogram , Current cardiac medication, Device interrogation, Device programming, Save to USB pen drive data + Printouts Adverse events, Life quality evaluation form, Current status of S-ICD system.
- appropriate number of shocks to the number of shocks recorded at 5 years after S-ICD implantation [ Time Frame: 5 years ]The primary endpoint is the rate of successful appropriate shocks recorded at 5 years after S-ICD implantation in Brugada syndrome patients. In this population that will be a mix of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, we anticipate a 1.5% per year event rate that will allow us to have a total of 15 patients receiving an appropriate shock at the end of the study.
- annual rate of inappropriate shocks [ Time Frame: 5 years ]The secondary end point will be the annual rate of inappropriate shocks, the complications of S-ICD implantation and the complications during the follow-up.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02344277
|Principal Investigator:||Vincent PROBST, Pr||Nantes University Hospital|